On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Once accepted,
> the proposed workflow should also become documented in Debian policy.
As this is no technical policy, this belongs into the developers
reference.
However,
On 1/2/23 16:28, Graham Inggs wrote:
qtbase-opensource-src is done, there's been no progress with PHP 8.2,
but we can deal with mapserver and zeroc-ice if they become entangled.
php-defaults got updated in unstable, now mapserver is BD-Uninstallable
until php8.2 gets built on ppc64el & s390x
Hi
I would like to upload linux version 6.1.3-1 (possibly 6.1.4-1
instead) to unstable.
Note this is aimed to be the kernel we want to use for Debian
bookworm.
An ABI bump is included. It is a new upstream version switching from
the 6.0.y stable release to 6.1.y.
Apart from switching from
Hi,
On 06-01-2023 07:39, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
What's your plan to deal with these entanglements?
I have bumped the priority of php8.2 on ppc64el and s390x as a start.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Dear Chromium team, Security team,
On 27-01-2022 17:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 09:38:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
So, I'm proposing the following: we unblock chromium from
testing, with the understanding that prior to bookworm's release, we
have a discussion with
On 1/5/23 12:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 1/5/23 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who
This has been a best practice for quite a while, high time to make it
hard requirement.
Kind Regards,
Bas
+1
On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 08:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>
> On 1/5/23 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who
>
> This has been a best practice for quite a while, high time to make it
> hard requirement.
I wholeheartedly agree here,
Hi!
Il gio 5 gen 2023, 12:28 Sebastiaan Couwenberg ha
scritto:
> On 1/5/23 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who
>
> This has been a best practice for quite a while, high time to make it
> hard requirement.
+1
mfv
Hi Ondřej,
On 21-12-2022 21:28, Paul Gevers wrote:
The bump from 8.x to 8.2 is relatively painless, so can we schedule the
transition in few days/weeks?
Please go ahead.
Ping. In a week from now, the Transition and Toolchain freeze starts
[1]. The upload should happen before then,
Dear all,
The Release Team just asked ftp-master to hold of accepting SONAME bumps
targeting unstable to ease the last days before the Transition and
Toolchain Freeze. The Release Team would like to ask the ftp-masters to
also by default reject SONAME bump NEW uploads to unstable during the
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-01-04 22:24:36 -0800, Kunal Mehta wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: lego...@debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to do the transition for libkiwix (and
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1027959 [release.debian.org] transition: libkiwix
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1027959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: tinyg...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:tinygltf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear release team,
I'd like to squeeze in this tiny
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:tinygltf
Bug #1027967 [release.debian.org] transition: tinygltf
Added indication that 1027967 affects src:tinygltf
--
1027967: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027967
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On 1/5/23 12:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who
This has been a best practice for quite a while, high time to make it
hard requirement.
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146
Your message dated Thu, 5 Jan 2023 11:00:48 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1026392: transition: gnat-12 status update
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026392,
regarding transition: gnat-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote in a mail with
the subject "SONAME bumps (transitions) always via experimental)":
> Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who like
> this?)
I like this.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
On 2023-01-05 13:13:59 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 at 12:26:09 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > The Release Team just asked ftp-master to hold of accepting SONAME bumps
> > targeting unstable to ease the last days before the Transition and Toolchain
> > Freeze. The Release Team
On 1/5/23 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
2. If there is already a version in experimental that is unsuitable for
the next stable release, because there's only one experimental, in the
rare case that upstream bumps the SONAME of the "old" branch, we can't
do as asked. For example:
Hi,
On 05-01-2023 14:13, Simon McVittie wrote:
since passing NEW currently requires a
source+binary upload but migrating to testing requires a follow-up
source-only upload (same total number of uploads).
To be fair, normal SONAME bump NEW uploads only need a arch:!all binary
On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 at 12:26:09 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> The Release Team just asked ftp-master to hold of accepting SONAME bumps
> targeting unstable to ease the last days before the Transition and Toolchain
> Freeze. The Release Team would like to ask the ftp-masters to also by
> default
21 matches
Mail list logo
