Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:dictionaries-common
Bug #1033281 [release.debian.org] unblock: dictionaries-common/1.29.5
Added indication that 1033281 affects src:dictionaries-common
--
1033281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: dictionaries-com...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:dictionaries-common
Please unblock package dictionaries-common
Sorry I forgot about hard freeze starting 2023
El mar, 21 mar 2023 a las 9:40, Agustin Martin () escribió:
>
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-Cc: dictionaries-com...@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:dictionaries-common
>
> Please unbloc
Control: retitle -1 unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6
aapt building is not supported on all arches, upstream only supports amd64,
arm64 and i386. So I had to restrict the test of building to those arches.
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index d439603..8c68cfa 100644
--- a/debian/
Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6
Bug #1033236 [release.debian.org] unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6' from 'unblock:
apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-5'.
--
1033236: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10332
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:05:23 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock curl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033273,
regarding unblock: curl/7.88.1-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libpaper. This new version only includes non-code
changes: a few typos corrections in manual pages and a new language
translation.
[ Reason ]
While this is not a nece
Hi, all. We're looking forward to uploading the latest CRS package to
bullseye-backports, but this will require this pending update to
bullseye. Any news on this front?
Regards,
Alberto
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta| Formación, consultoría y soporte técnico
mailto/sip: a...@inittab.org | en GN
Hello. I'm providing the same information in "reportbug format", just
in case not having doing so in the initial report may have contributed
for this report not to be processed yet.
[ Reason ]
This upload fixes FTBFS Bug #991067 (an imagemagick update which was
done in bullseye late in the releas
Hello. I'm providing the same information in "reportbug format", just
in case not having doing so in the initial report may have contributed
for this report not to be processed yet.
[ Reason ]
This upload fixes FTBFS Bug #997222 (failure to build with newer kernel).
[ Impact ]
Without this updat
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 1029206
Bug #1033290 [release.debian.org] unblock: gnome-builder/43.6-3
1033290 was not blocked by any bugs.
1033290 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 1033290: 1029206
--
1033290: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=10332
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:amanda
Bug #1033292 [release.debian.org] unblock: amanda/1:3.5.1-11
Added indication that 1033292 affects src:amanda
--
1033292: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033292
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ama...@packages.debian.org, jose.calha...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt,
calha...@debian.org, ns-l...@dsi.ist.utl.pt
Control: affects -1 + src:amanda
Please unblock package amanda
[ Re
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On 20-03-2023 22:15, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
Would it be
appropriate to use testing-proposed-updates for this, as suggested on the freeze
policy page?
I'm wondering where you are reading that. The text says: If there are
unrelated changes in unstable, we ask you to revert
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #1033267 [release.debian.org] Upload ccache bookworm fix via
testing-proposed-updates?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1033267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033267
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with pr
Hi Pirate,
Thanks for reaching out.
On 20-03-2023 16:44, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I request bookworm-ignore tags for these bugs (as such there is
no immediate breakage, just unmaintained upstreams for these packages).
> yarnpkg: 980316,958686, 1002902, 980316
> node-har-validator: 1024575
> nod
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:06:38 +0100
with message-id <4047e804-9f78-7e52-fbb5-898932b01...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033244: unblock: armci-mpi/0.3.1~beta-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033244,
regarding unblock: armci-mpi/0.3.1~beta-7
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 22:09:09 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1033236: unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033236,
regarding unblock: apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, at 20:55, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I'm wondering where you are reading that. The text says: If there are
> unrelated changes in unstable, we ask you to revert these changes
> instead of making an upload to testing-proposed-updates.
>
> What's unclear in that phrase?
I think tha
Hi,
On 21-03-2023 22:11, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
I think that what made things unclear to me was the "revert" part which just
didn't fit my mental model of how things work. But under "Applying for an
unblock" I now read "[...] revert [...] e.g. by using a
new-version+reallyold-version versioning sch
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:35:13 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gnome-initial-setup
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033249,
regarding unblock: gnome-initial-setup/43.2-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:35:27 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock emacs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033268,
regarding unblock: emacs/1:28.2+1-13
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Paul Gevers:
Hi,
On 20-03-2023 17:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I haven't really ever been able to troubleshoot it. I don't have access to a
s390x box. And:
~ $ ssh zelenka.debian.org
ssh: connect to host zelenka.debian.org port 22: Connection timed out
~ $
That's the only porter
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:39:22 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock dictionaries-common
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033281,
regarding unblock: dictionaries-common/1.29.5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:44:17 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock sqlite3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033197,
regarding unblock: sqlite3/3.40.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:48:12 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock darktable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033213,
regarding unblock: darktable/4.2.1-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1032794 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] qtwebengine-opensource-src
5.15.13 for bookworm?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032794: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032794
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2023-03-11 21:04:14 +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Qt WebEngine 5.15 LTS branch has a new patch release, 5.15.13.
>
> It mostly contains backports for security fixes from upstream Chromium,
On Tue, Mar 21 2023 at 09:06:41 PM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, Paul Gevers
wrote:
Hi Pirate,
Thanks for reaching out.
On 20-03-2023 16:44, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I request bookworm-ignore tags for these bugs (as such there is
no immediate breakage, just unmaintained upstreams for these
packages)
29 matches
Mail list logo
