Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Hi! On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 10:25 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > Linux 6.7 fails to build on at least i386 and armhf. Even it now > manages to make the compiler fail to allocate memory: > > cc1: out of memory allocating 135266296 bytes after a total of 235675648 > > bytes > > Right now both fail

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 10:50:31AM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > As it is now, we will not be able to provide a kernel for maybe all > > 32bit architectures for Trixie. > I don't think that this would be a reasonable decision. We're preparing to > switch > 32-bit architectures over

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: >... > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. > > Okay, maybe more

Processed: bookworm-pu: package apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6+deb12u1

Processing control commands: > affects -1 + src:apktool Bug #1060433 [release.debian.org] bookworm-pu: package apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6+deb12u1 Added indication that 1060433 affects src:apktool -- 1060433: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1060433 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Bug#1060433: bookworm-pu: package apktool/2.7.0+dfsg-6+deb12u1

Package: release.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:apktool X-Debbugs-Cc: apkt...@packages.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: bookworm Severity: normal [ Reason ] This fixes CVE-2024-21633. [ Impact ] If this is not included, bookworm users will be

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Hi, On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 09:42, Bastian Blank wrote: > > Hi > > Linux 6.7 fails to build on at least i386 and armhf. Even it now > manages to make the compiler fail to allocate memory: > | cc1: out of memory allocating 135266296 bytes after a total of 235675648 > bytes > > Right now both

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Hi On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. Okay, maybe more workarounds exist. But none of them look really promising. >

Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Hi Linux 6.7 fails to build on at least i386 and armhf. Even it now manages to make the compiler fail to allocate memory: | cc1: out of memory allocating 135266296 bytes after a total of 235675648 bytes Right now both fail on the same driver, so a short team workaround would be to disable it.

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

Hello Dimitri, On Thu, 2024-01-11 at 09:48 +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > Separately, I wish we had cross-builders available, and cross-build > i386/armhf kernels from amd64/arm64 and thus having access to 64-bit > compiler. Helmut Grohne is actually working towards cross-builders and I

Bug#1059929: marked as done (release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:32:33 +0100 with message-id <49eda68c-9a49-41f0-9975-b95fa491f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency has caused the Debian Bug report #1059929,

Bug#971739: marked as done (release.debian.org: britney thinks ghostscript B-D on libz-dev:native is unsatisfiable)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:32:33 +0100 with message-id <49eda68c-9a49-41f0-9975-b95fa491f...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency has caused the Debian Bug report #971739, regarding

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

On 2024-01-11 13:24, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:28:19AM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > >... > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > > split debug symbols (disabled

Processed: block 1055955 with 1060458

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1055955 with 1060458 Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38 1055955 was blocked by: 1042844 1054776 1050451 1057318 1060323 1042845 1057270 1040396 1042853 1057424 1042525 1042521 1054793 1055955 was not blocking any bugs.

Processed: Re: Bug#1026046: FTBFS: test failures on some architectures

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.51-1 Bug #1026046 [src:libdevel-mat-perl] libdevel-mat-perl: FTBFS: test failures on some architectures Marked as found in versions libdevel-mat-perl/0.51-1. > severity -1 serious Bug #1026046 [src:libdevel-mat-perl] libdevel-mat-perl: FTBFS: test

Processed: block 1055955 with 1060653

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1055955 with 1060653 Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38 1055955 was blocked by: 1057270 1050451 1042844 1042521 1060458 1042525 1054793 1042845 1057424 1026046 1060456 1042853 1040396 1057318 1060323 1054776 1055955

Processed: unblock 1055955 with 1042845 1040396

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # only in sid > unblock 1055955 with 1042845 1040396 Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38 1055955 was blocked by: 1060653 1042844 1060323 1042845 1057318 1060456 1026046 1057424 1042853 1040396 1060458 1042521 1054793 1042525

Processed: block 1055955 with 1060456, user debian-p...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 1060456

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 1055955 with 1060456 Bug #1055955 [release.debian.org] transition: perl 5.38 1055955 was blocked by: 1054776 1042521 1042525 1060458 1057318 1060323 1050451 1054793 1042844 1042845 1057424 1057270 1026046 1040396 1042853 1055955 was not

Bug#1059929: release.debian.org: gobject-introspection_1.78.1-9 is said to have an unsatisfiable dependency

On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 at 09:54:52 +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote: > I am not sure that you are the one who should express a qemu dependency. Discussion of whether gobject-introspection has the ideal dependencies seems off-topic for a release.d.o bug, so I've sent a reply to #1030223, dropping the

Re: Ability to further support 32bit architectures

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 5:45 AM Bastian Blank wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 09:48:34AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Disabling debug symbols, enabling debug symbol zstd compression, using > > split debug symbols (disabled BTF usage) should help here. > > Okay, maybe more workarounds