Bug#687434: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-6 (fixes: CVE-2012-4413)

2012-09-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 00:54 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Please unblock package keystone. This fixes CVE-2012-4413. Debdiff is attached. Unblocked. Note that I am well aware of #687311 (I was the one who reported it), but I would like to fix this one later on, using urgency=low, so it has

Bug#685633: pu: package network-manager/0.8.1-6+squeeze2

2012-09-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + squeeze pending On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 15:58 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: On 12.09.2012 14:00, Philipp Kern wrote: [...] On 22.08.2012 21:01, Michael Biebl wrote: I'd like to upload a fix for #655972 [1] to stable, which fixes CVE-2012-2736. [...] So not even newer

Bug#687114: pu: package apache2/2.2.16-6+squeeze8

2012-09-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 21:04 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-09 at 23:23 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote: Please review apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze8 for inclusion in squeeze. It fixes a minor security issue and some important bugs: [...] Assuming

Bug#687477: unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4

2012-09-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 07:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer standing RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from it remaining in testing (example: sitplus, see #680798). There seems to be some

Bug#687477: unblock: poco/1.3.6p1-4

2012-09-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.09.2012 08:26, Andreas Tille wrote: On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 07:23:00AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 07:53 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: while poco seems to be removed from testing due to some longer standing RC bugs there are packages (build-)depending from

Your mysql-mm stable upload

2012-09-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, I noticed that you've uploaded a mysql-mm package to the stable NEW queue. However both the version and changelog for the update suggest it was intended for the backports.d.o archive and there doesn't appear to have been any discussion regarding the upload on debian-release; please could you

Re: Your mysql-mm stable upload

2012-09-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, On 14.09.2012 07:44, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:26:21 +0100 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: I noticed that you've uploaded a mysql-mm package to the stable NEW queue. However both the version and changelog for the update suggest it was intended

Bug#687632: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar-classification/2.2.1-1

2012-09-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[The comments below are relevant for at least some of the other tryton-* requests, I've just chosen to reply to this one] On 14.09.2012 13:01, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-calendar-classification_2.2.1-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix

Re: Your mysql-mm stable upload

2012-09-14 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:06 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:42:11 +0100 Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: In any case, proposed-updates is not backports, so the current upload is definitely incorrect. The patch itself looks okay though. I'll get

testing build information (was: Re: Bug#686725: tpu: package icecast2/2.3.2-9+deb7u1)

2012-09-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[s/686725@bugs/debian-release/] On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 00:25 -0400, David Prévot wrote: P.-S.: something seems recently broken on the buildd web interface: lxc information is not accurate for wheezy [0]: marked as installed for every architecture while it failed on ia64 and wasn't built on

Bug#687632: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar-classification/2.2.1-1

2012-09-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:05 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: On 14.09.2012 13:01, Mathias Behrle wrote: * Convert buffer into string for vobject That's really not a particular helpful description for deciding whether the upload is appropriate for an unblock; upstream's changelog of *

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:43 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: * Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side This is looking like the favourite so far,

Bug#686918: pu: package dpkg/1.15.8.13

2012-09-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 12:14 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-11 at 20:53:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 08:52 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: dpkg: Do not translate SE Linux context to human readable form [...] Assuming

Re: [Pkg-postgresql-public] postgresql-8.4/security newer than unstable / testing

2012-09-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 07:36 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: Martin Pitt [2012-09-09 13:50 +0200]: Hm, interesting case. As it has to be smaller than the backports versions but bigger than squeeze-security's, I don't see other options than keeping wheezy up to date with new upstream versions.

Re: unblock policyd-weight/0.1.15.2-3

2012-09-20 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 20.09.2012 09:33, Werner Detter wrote: I've just recreated a policyd-weight package (0.1.15.2-4). The new package already entered unstable, it includes a new quilt-patch which removes several DNSBL's from rfc-ignorant.org due to a service shutdown of the rfc-ignorant.org lists on 2012-11-30.

Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Please unblock package osm2pgsql. Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up with the changelog, and didn't notice it was -3 only after the dput) fixes RC bug #687965. The bug report

Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:19 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 09:24 +0200, David Paleino wrote: Please unblock package osm2pgsql. Latest version (which should've been -2, but I've messed up

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] Sorry, been travelling

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 15:59 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for

Bug#688495: unblock: osm2pgsql/0.80.0+r27899-3

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:31:38 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:19 +0200, David Paleino wrote: On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 17:11:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The bug report indicates that database tables would need

Bug#688557: unblock: uswsusp/1.0+20110509-3

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 18:43 +0200, Rodolfo García Peñas wrote: This new version fixes some debconf template translations. The current version at testing don't have all the debconf translations done (only 48/50), and this new version includes all the translations for the required languages

Bug#688485: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:37 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Please unblock package syslinux-themes-debian Updating this fixes bugs #688272 and #681426, as well as finishes (so far as we know) the transition for packages which copy the theme in their own packaging.

Bug#688096: unblock: bsnes/0.088-5 (pre-approval)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 12:04 +0200, Tobias Hansen wrote: * Fix issues with bsnes-purify (Closes: #687034): - Fix segmentation fault when run with less than two arguments. - Purify also files with uppercase suffix. * Add missing epoch to versioned

Bug#687492: unblock: aptitude/0.6.8.2-1 (pre-approve)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 17:45 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: The fixes for this have been in experimental since July. The minor update presented here contains some of those needed to support the rest in the next release. I fully expect that next release to be the

Re: Please unblock some packages for xz compression

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:53 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: please consider unblocking the following packages: unblock sane-backends/1.0.22-7.4 unblock openssh-blacklist/0.4.1+nmu1 unblock ghostscript/9.05~dfsg-6.1 All done. +# Use xz compression: +DEB_DH_BUILDDEB_ARGS ?= -u-Zxz

Bug#684871: unblock: nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.37-1, nvidia-settings/304.37-1, nvidia-xconfig/304.37-1

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 21:20 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2012-09-23 22:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Now after nvidia-graphics-drivers/304.48-1 has migrated to testing, nvidia-settings in testing is no longer usable as its not co-installable with the updated driver. Both unblocked

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we just need lkdi, a round of d-i binNMUs

Re: VLC Enable sftp

2012-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 00:35 +0800, Larry Pinney wrote: VideoLAN should have sftp enabled in order to play video on the (my) LAN. Please include the commit from Benjamin Drung in the upcoming Release. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/vlc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ebfad0e The

Re: Please unblock some more packages for xz compression

2012-09-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 22:57 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: some more packages were uploaded and would like an unblock: unblock aptitude/0.6.8.1-2 unblock gnome-control-center/1:3.4.2-2.1 unblock gucharmap/1:3.4.1.1-2.1 unblock nmap/6.00-0.2 unblock norwegian/2.0.10-5.1 They get

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.09.2012 11:53, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. The other two ia32-libs-* do not require an update in this

Bug#688861: freeze exception: libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1 - adding a libxvmc1-i386:i386 package

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.09.2012 14:01, Ralf Jung wrote: As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see #640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to the libxvmc package: Related to this, there's also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373 Not so

Bug#688861: freeze exception: libxvmc/1.0.7-1.1 - adding a libxvmc1-i386:i386 package

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.09.2012 14:32, Ralf Jung wrote: As we are not going to get libxvmc turned to multi-arch for wheezy (see #640499) I'm now trying another approach with minimal changes to the libxvmc package: Related to this, there's also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687373 Not so

Re: Closing in for d-i wheezy beta 3

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 19:11 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: # XXX: second look appreciated # xz compression + 4 RC bug fixes unblock grub2/1.99-23 unblock-udeb grub2/1.99-23 Looks sane enough to me. # single bugfix for pf crash, no-op for d-i: unblock kfreebsd-9/9.0-6 unblock-udeb

Re: Removing block-udeb gtk+3.0?

2012-09-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 16:10 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: since gtk+3.0 again appeared on my testing summary page (packages of interest as far as unblock{,-udeb}'s are concerned), I'm wondering whether it shouldn't just get its block-udeb removed? For the record; done. Regards, Adm -- To

Bug#688966: Review midgard2-core package

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 27.09.2012 15:44, Piotr Pokora wrote: Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze. I'm assuming you mean wheezy? Package contains only one RC bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795 and hopefully fixes one RC bug :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:53 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, September 26, 2012 11:02, Philipp Kern wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:17:53AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: OK, so we need to update ia32-libs again, now that all changes are in. [...] ok, please upload as soon as possible

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh) and unstable (bad) during the point release b) exclude ia32-libs from the point release (not ideal) c) get a newer (well

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-27 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 06:56 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 22:38, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2012-09-27 at 22:10 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Thu, September 27, 2012 20:52, Adam D. Barratt wrote: a) prop-up the packages from p-u to testing (meh

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 28.09.2012 07:55, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Fri, September 28, 2012 07:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Is adding the epoch any more involved than just changing the version number, from a packaging point of view? If not, then doing that today would indeed be one way out of the issue, depending

Bug#688740: unblock: tomboy/1.10.0-2

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:15 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 10:58 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: I uploaded tomboy per KiBi's request in #688706 to compress it with .xz. That's the only change. Unblocked; thanks. fwiw, tomboy isn't ready to migrate yet for a couple of reasons

Bug#688575: unblock: freebsd-utils/9.0+ds1-8

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-23 at 22:13 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: Please unblock package freebsd-utils This is a fix for #686013. It adds maintainer scripts setting up the state file as required by the NFS server on kFreeBSD. The diff only fixes the RC bug, nothing else. Thanks for the fix. For the

Bug#689139: unblock: libfso-glib/2012.05.24.1-1.1

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 09:15 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Please unblock package libfso-glib It fixes a serious mess of the “directory replaced by symlink”-kind. Unblocked; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#689103: nmu: asterisk-flite_2.1-1

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 09:55 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: nmu asterisk-flite_2.1-1 . ALL . -m Re-link against newer asterisk (that has broken shlibs file). I assume the point is actually that the new asterisk has a /fixed/ shlibs file? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#689157: unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.8

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 17:50 +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote: Before we get in to the body of your mail: mediawiki-extensions (2.6+wheezy1 to 2.8) [...] mediawiki-extensions-base (i386, amd64, armel, armhf, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc) has new

Re: Processed: this is definitely RC

2012-09-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
# On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 16:06 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: # severity 689157 important # Bug #689157 [release.debian.org] unblock: mediawiki-extensions/2.8 # Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' severity 689157 normal thanks Please don't do that. Everyone's unblock request is

Re: Processed: block 680670 with 688793, tagging 680670

2012-09-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 03:30 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 680670 with 688793 Bug #680670 {Done: Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org} [obnam] obnam: add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key 680670 was not blocked

Re: Processed: block 680670 with 688793, tagging 680670

2012-09-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 09:56 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote: On 2012-09-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote: How is the unblock request blocking the fixing of the bug? The bug is already fixed and it's not even blocking the transition of the fix, given that the unblock was added. True, it doesn't

Bug#681016: [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-8

2012-09-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:35 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote: Just waiting to see if anyone else has something to say about it, but it doesn't seem the case. Ok, i'll prepare the fix for #677060 and ask for upload to testing-proposed-updates. That now happened, but on reviewing it I have to

Re: Why tagged moreinfo? (WAS: Re: Processed: tagging 683323)

2012-10-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags 683323 - moreinfo On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 12:23 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 06:36:03PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 683323 + moreinfo Bug #683323 [release.debian.org] unblock:

Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-party-vcarddav/2.2.1-1

2012-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-party-vcarddav_2.2.1-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. [...] * Reports must no more be encoded in base64 I might regret asking this, but... why not? Regards,

Bug#681016: [release.debian.org] unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-8

2012-10-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Control: retitle -1 unblock: dotlrn/2.5.0+dfsg-6+wheezy2 On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 01:38 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote: I have uploaded the new version containing the fix for the new RC bug previously mentioned to svn, and asked for upload to t-p-u to my sponsor[1].

Bug#689448: unblock: xorg-server/2:1.12.4-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Tue, 2012-10-02 at 20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Please unblock package xorg-server Unblocked; thanks. I'm leaving the bug open until we can add the unblock-udeb, which will be after d-i beta 3. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: libusb upload to testing-proposed-updates

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-09-29 at 15:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 15:08:42 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote: I've already NMUed libusb 2:0.1.12-23+nmu1 to sid to fix RC bug #668026 there. However I've also discovered the bug is present in the version currently in testing

Bug#687691: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-timesheet/2.2.2-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:11 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-timesheet_2.2.2-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Do not compute twice the children timesheets Please go

Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-party-vcarddav/2.2.1-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 14:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: * Betr.: Re: Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-party-vcarddav/2.2.1-1 (Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:07:07 +0100): On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the

Bug#687639: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-stock-supply/2.2.2-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:32 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-stock-supply_2.2.2-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Tax rule apply method return a list of tax ids Please

Bug#687638: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-stock/2.2.3-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:28 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-stock_2.2.3-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Ensure clause concatination works with tuple vs list Please

Bug#687625: pre-approve unblock: tryton-client/2.2.3-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:27 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-client_2.2.3-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Fix wrong sorting to get lazy first * Use repr for faultCode in

Bug#687628: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-account-statement/2.2.1-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:52 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-account-statement_2.2.1-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Fix sign of the amount to pay on line Please go

Bug#687626: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.4-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:36 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-server_2.2.4-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * NULL value for boolean fields should be considered like False *

Bug#687627: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-account/2.2.3-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:46 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-account_2.2.3-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Fix typo for account.rec_name * Ensure clause

Bug#687631: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar/2.2.1-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:57 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of unblock: tryton-modules-calendar_2.2.1-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Convert buffer into string for vobject * No need

Bug#687636: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-product/2.2.2-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:25 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-product_2.2.2-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Re-fix non zero rate unittest * Fix non zero rate unittest

Bug#687634: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar-todo/2.2.1-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:13 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-calendar-todo_2.2.1-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Fix typo from changeset caaaccd11a73 * Create new

Bug#687633: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling/2.2.2-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:08 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: please approve the upload of tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling_2.2.2-1. The new version contains the upstream bug fix release [1]. The fixes are for * Add missing test on owner Please go ahead, and

Bug#687632: pre-approve unblock: tryton-modules-calendar-classification/2.2.1-1

2012-10-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 21:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote: could I please have a go for this issue, too, as for the the other Tryton modules? Including context is helpful ;-p Ack. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#687626: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.4-1

2012-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 05.10.2012 10:54, Mathias Behrle wrote: * Betr.: Re: Bug#687626: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.4-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:09:30 +0100): Please go ahead, and let us know once the package has been in unstable for a few days. Just uploaded Tryton server and related packages to

Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5

2012-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 04.10.2012 08:40, Atsuhito KOHDA wrote: Please unblock package dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5 This version fixes the grave bug#688253 i.e. unistallable in sid. Basically, it is a dependency problem and we need to change dependency from obsolete vfdata-morisawa5 to

Bug#688119: unblock: dynamips/0.2.7-0.2.8RC2-5.1

2012-10-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Hi, Further to the unblock... On 19.09.2012 16:13, Arno Töll wrote: Please unblock package dynamips. It fixes the FTBS issue documented in #682412 (debdiff posted there). The NMU adds a patch by gregoa, which fixen broken LIBS usage. dynamips is non-free and not autobuilt. Looking at the

Re: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[re-ordered] Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes: Thanks for fixing #688201. Unfortunately from a very quick look at the diff it includes a change which makes it unsuitable for inclusion in wheezy (and doesn't appear to be documented in the changelog afaict): -Depends

Re: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller] On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen? It does exist, in exactly the same way that e.g. mail-transport-agent does.

Re: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen? It does exist

Re: Bug#682719: Your gcl 2.6.7-107 upload

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 23:26 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote

Re: D-I binNMU

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 20:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Please binNMU d-i to get an updated netcfg. Scheduled. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Bug#687189: unblock: calendarserver/3.2+dfsg-2

2012-10-08 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 11:05 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote: Also, regular updates of calendarserver in wheezy will be pushed through wheezy-updates as calendarserver has to be updated whenever tz database is updated at http://www.iana.org/time-zones. That's something we can talk about after the

Bug#690074: unblock: wpa/1.0-3

2012-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 19:48 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: please unblock wpa 1.0-3 . It fixes CVE-2012-4445. I saw on IRC that it's currently held back due to it's udeb, but let's file a bug to keep it on the radar. Unblocked, but with no udeb hint for

Bug#690073: unblock: gunicorn/0.14.5-3

2012-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 19:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 19:47 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: please unblock gunicorn 0.14.5-3 It fixes a security issue (no bug and no CVE yet) Not overly happy with the undocumented packaging helper change (python-support

Bug#690085: unblock: gtkrsync/1.0.4+nmu1

2012-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:56 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: Please unblock package gtkrsync This package fixes #629729 (fix non installable build dependencies) gtkrsync hasn't been in testing for over a year; I think we'd need a fairly compelling reason to re-add

Bug#688119: unblock: dynamips/0.2.7-0.2.8RC2-5.1

2012-10-09 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 00:39 +0200, Arno Töll wrote: On 05.10.2012 23:57, Adam D. Barratt wrote: dynamips is non-free and not autobuilt. Looking at the archive, it appears that the maintainer has only been uploading i386 builds, whereas your NMU was on amd64. Could we possibly have an i386

Bug#685752: unblock: live-tools/3.0.9-1

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:17 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: Please unblock package live-tools Primarily to fix diversion conflicts. Also includes doc updates and other fixes needed for the release. In the meantime, the package is now up to 3.0.12. I'm assuming the changes from .10 and .11 would

Bug#685754: unblock: live-config/3.0.4-1

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:27 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote: Please unblock package live-config Several fixes, mostly relating to locales and keyboard configuration, along with doc updates. We're now up to 3.0.8, including four uploads within the space of a week (one

Bug#685837: unblock: tomcat-native/1.1.24-1

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 21:48 -0700, tony mancill wrote: On 08/25/2012 06:15 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Looking at the diff (please bear in mind I know little to nothing in java/jni, so those are naïve questions): - is tcn_socket_t for internal use only or is it exposed outside the

Bug#685960: unblock: gnupg/1.4.12-5 (pre-approval)

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 22:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 23:00 -0400, David Prévot wrote: Can someone from the release team please confirm that you would consider unblocking such an upload of gnupg, knowing that a udeb is involved too? After a chat with KiBi

Re: CVE against the fwknop package

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 10.10.2012 20:29, Franck Joncourt wrote: I have prepared an upload for squeeze to fix the CVEs against the 2.0.0rc2 release. I have enclosed a debdiff. I assume you meant wheezy here? squeeze has 1.9. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#685658: unblock: maildir-utils/0.9.8.5-3

2012-10-10 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2012-10-11 at 07:40 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote: On Mi, 10 Okt 2012, Julien Cristau wrote: It's not clear to me why you're saying an epoch would be necessary. The fix you sent could be applied to the version in testing and uploaded there directly.

Bug#690283: some packages testing migration link is missing (no contrib package?)

2012-10-11 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: forcemerge 678242 -1 On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 10:41 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/ruby-pgplot.html says problems The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is over. Check why. However, link to

Bug#685913: unblock: warzone2100/3.1~rc2-1

2012-10-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 26.08.2012 06:51, Paul Wise wrote: I would like to find out if it would be possible for the release team to review and unblock warzone2100 3.1~rc2-1. Here are some thoughts: Apologies for not having got back to you about this sooner. Has there been a final release yet, or is rc2 still the

Bug#688080: unblock: tomoyo-tools/2.5.0-2012-0414-10

2012-10-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 19.09.2012 06:43, Hideki Yamane wrote: diff -Nru tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian --- tomoyo-tools-2.5.0-20120414/debian/README.Debian2012-05-26 06:21:49.0 +0900 +++

Bug#689698: unblock: gupnp/0.10.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 05.10.2012 10:34, Andreas Henriksson wrote: Please unblock packages in the gupnp stack The upstream stable series bugfix updates has been sitting in unstable for over a month now without a single bug reported. The updates improves interopability with DLNA devices

Bug#690196: Bug #690196: unblock: udj-desktop-client/0.6.1-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 11.10.2012 03:49, Nathan Handler wrote: Please unblock package udj-desktop-client udj-desktop-client 0.5.1-2 is currently in testing. Upstream has released a new API and prepared an updated version of udj-desktop-client to use this new API. They are currently

Bug#690134: unblock: polyorb/2.8~20110207-5

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 10.10.2012 11:42, xavier wrote: Please unblock package polyorb There is a bug against libpolyorb3 (#688299) in version 2.8~20110207-4. Version 2.8~20110207-5 remove the diversion and the manpage that was diverted and this solve the bug. For the record, it

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 05.10.2012 16:47, Guo Yixuan wrote: Please unblock package gcc-4.6-doc Although it just reached sid, I believe it's should be allowed into wheezy. This package contains documents for gcc-4.6 (cpp, gcc, gccgo, gcj and gnat) in manpages, info, html and pdf. Why

Bug#689727: unblock: gcc-4.7-doc/4.7.2-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 05.10.2012 16:55, Guo Yixuan wrote: Please unblock package gcc-4.7-doc GCC needs updated documents, but it can only be distributed in non-free, not in src:gcc-4.7. So I wish this package to go into wheezy. This package contains document for gcc-4.7, with all

Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 12.10.2012 01:52, NOKUBI Takatsugu wrote: Please unblock package file-mmagic Old file-mmagic uses deprecated perl syntax, so I want to unblock it. The follwing is diff (really small changes): http://cvs.namazu.org/Subversion/MMagic/trunk/MMagic.pm?r1=286r2=279

Bug#689726: unblock: gcc-4.6-doc/4.6.3-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.10.2012 16:24, Guo Yixuan wrote: 于 2012年10月13日 22:23, Adam D. Barratt 写道: Why is the package's Maintainer field set to someone who has no obvious connection with the package? This is because Samuel did most of the packaging work half a year ago, and I just updated it to match current

Bug#690281: unblock: file-mmagic/1.29-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.10.2012 16:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo ftr, the submitter's email bounces: k...@knok.daionet.gr.jp SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:k...@knok.daionet.gr.jp: host daio.daionet.gr.jp [61.194.16.210]: 554 5.7.1 k...@knok.daionet.gr.jp

Bug#689154: unblock: gnunet/0.9.3-4

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 01.10.2012 12:30, Holger Levsen wrote: On Samstag, 29. September 2012, Bertrand Marc wrote: Would you consider to give gnunet 0.9.3-4 a freeze exception ? This version is not yet uploaded to unstable, my sponsor is waiting for your approval. fwiw, the diff

Bug#689425: unblock: fcitx-googlepinyin/0.1.6-1

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On 02.10.2012 14:29, Aron Xu wrote: This is a relatively big debdiff, but most of the noise are come from the newly added svg files which show up as text files in diff. These changes are limiting the input and install icons to avoid crashing fcitx main program. Even

Bug#689579: unblock: dvi2ps-fontdesc-morisawa5/0.5

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 06.10.2012 00:03, Atsuhito Kohda wrote: On Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:12:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The package was removed from testing back in May as part of the last TeXLive transition. Is there a particular justification for trying to re-add it now? At TeXLive transition, I thought

Re: beanstalkd: proposed TPU (diff for NMU version 1.4.6-3.1)

2012-10-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 13.10.2012 18:17, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Please consider the attached patch for beanstalkd to fix RC bug #687402 (FTBFS, test failure). It must go through TPU. Hi Serafeim: this also serves as notice to NMU through DELAYED/2, please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >