/autogen.sh binfmt-support-2.0.12/autogen.sh
--- binfmt-support-2.0.10/autogen.sh2012-06-26 00:08:49.0 +0100
+++ binfmt-support-2.0.12/autogen.sh2012-09-17 23:48:45.0 +0100
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-#! /bin/sh -e
+#! /bin/sh
+set -e
# Copyright (C) 2010 Colin Watson.
#
@@ -12,5
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012, Colin Watson wrote:
It also occurred to me that gettext should depend on libasprintf-dev and
libgettextpo-dev, otherwise anything that Build-Depends on gettext
expecting to be able to use one of those libraries
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 09:23:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 13:31:12 +, Colin Watson wrote:
Well, on the one hand, multiarch is a release goal, but it can't
realistically be an open-ended one - we have to stop somewhere. It's
not as if there aren't plenty
()
sources = gzip.GzipFile(os.path.join(source_dir, Sources.gz), w)
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
@@
+putty (0.62-9) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Backport from upstream (Simon Tatham):
+- Fix handling of non-default numeric keypad modes when Num Lock is on
+ (closes: #680261).
+
+ -- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Thu, 23 Aug 2012 12:58:52 +0100
+
putty (0.62-8) unstable; urgency
think this was a reasonable thing to
allow into testing - I have a feeling it will require special
arrangements to make use of it anyway, so it should be harmless.
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
untuk ini. Lihat /usr/share/doc/
+openssh-server/README.compromised-keys.gz untuk rincian lebih lanjut.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
to fix a segfault whilst applying
+killfile to article with long header line; articles with References
+headers 1024 bytes are not uncommon, but in practice they do not seem
+to grow very much beyond that (closes: #682803).
+
+ -- Colin Watson cjwat...@debian.org Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:23:45
and common release management sense.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
),
galeon-nautilus
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
break attal :(
Hint added.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they render themselves uninstallable; I'll
ignore these unless they continue to have problems after the new r-base
is promoted.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
not really something we want to rely on too much.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:04:37PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:48:01AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
That's actually exactly the current state. However, it's more difficult
to get user testing of t-p-u uploads before they get into testing, so
it's not really something
are definitely not ready for consumption yet?
Nothing from me ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should
be freezing really quite shortly after that, and I think we're in a
position to do so given d-i's current state of readiness.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:26:26AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040524 00:40]:
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 08:57:39PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
So, I would like to move these packages / programs into main (more
specifically, ppmtogif from netpbm-nonfree
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:57:03PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
pciutils, kudzu, sndconfig, and athtool should be able to go into sarge
as a group with the proper hint.
I've adjusted my existing hint; thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to depend on telnet-ssl then that isn't allowed.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-06-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 09:49:33AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Now that kudzu has finally been compiled and uploaded for s390
pciutils should be able to go
this to the ftpmasters, via a bug on ftp.debian.org.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
agree, and have just downgraded the bug.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 06:45:31PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
It looks like tilp and libticalcs4 are waiting on each other to enter
testing, could the required hints be added ?
Done, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
type that covers this case.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as sablevm {build-}depends on libffi which is not
available on mips and mipsel while sablevm-classlib *IS* built properly
on these platforms.
Let me know if there's anything I missed.
Hint added, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 09:03:18PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
I believe petsc and illuminator are ready to go into testing together;
please let me know if this is not the case.
Hint added, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
been added to
http://buildd.debian.org/quinn-diff/Packages-arch-specific, so file a
bug on ftp.debian.org to have the obsolete binary removed.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be updated; if the uninstallable count after that run
is = the count before the hint, the whole transaction is committed.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in testing anyway:
kurush | 0.11-1 | unstable | source, all
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7 to
libpth2. Please revert this as soon as possible, as it breaks d-i. At
the moment, you need to get debootstrap updated well in advance of
changes like this.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
On 2004-07-11 Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You also appear to have introduced a new dependency from libgcrypt7 to
libpth2.
libgcrypt7 has not changed.
libgcrypt7 has always linked against the library contained
,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
release being
small, non-invasive tweaks for high-severity bugs.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pending major reorganization of SableVM debian packages
along with some major changes on the upstream side. One of them will
be a single tarball containing all of SableVM, which in turn should
make hinting no longer necessary.
That would be very nice. :-)
--
Colin Watson
are not that
many. Then one go into fix,test Sarge.
That's approximately what's happening ...
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 04:34:22PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 05:44:23PM -0400, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote:
The 1.1.6-1 packages of SableVM (sablevm and sablevm-classlib sources)
didn't get into testing even though 5
normal uploads which take 10
days to propogate to testing.
It certainly should have happened rather earlier, but the risk we're
trying to avoid is that we need to freeze base to coincide with the d-i
release. Uploads to t-p-u will still be allowed.
--
Colin Watson
is ...
We don't pay any attention to woody-tagged bugs for the purposes of
sarge.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Otherwise, thanks for that; hint added.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
marked last date for
urgency=low uploads, there's no reason why not.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 06:12:06PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:42:38PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:50:59AM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
I'm seeking the opinion of the release team on whether there's any
point right now in trying
won't know if you don't try. :-)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and documentation to assume 3.1. Maybe 4.0 would've been better but I
think by now we should just make sure the release notes are complete.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that this package is removed from sarge
(it should be ok that it remains in unstable).
I agree. Hinted for removal.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
are tagged sarge and we'll
deal with them. Still, if you just want a package removed from sarge and
not sid it'll be more efficient to mail this list.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it
elsewhere. Thank you.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing again
before it's fixed. Can you please remove it?
Hinted for removal.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 04:14:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 02:51:56PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
That's OK, but please take your disagreement with that and your posts
that stem from this disagreement off this mailing list. Right now, it is
simply not in the least
to sarge, or should I upload a 0.60 to t-p-u?
Diff approved; I've marked adduser 2.59 to be forced into sarge.
[Sorry if you didn't want a CC; it's kind of awkward to decide whether
to treat debian-release as a role address or as a mailing list ...]
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 09:41:40AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 12:58:30AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Diff approved; I've marked adduser 2.59 to be forced into sarge.
3.59. Even I didn't get my own version numbers right.
I got it right in the hints file
if it's very urgent that it be removed from sarge immediately.
Normally packages will be removed from sarge automatically once they're
removed from sid, so there's no need to duplicate work.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
woody. A specific note in the
upgrade documentation would help others avoid
those pitfalls.
This is an issue for whoever at debian-doc is doing the release notes.
(Is it still Rob Bradford?)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any other installer issue is).
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
Hinted for removal.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uploading yourself, otherwise we're just setting
ourselves up for problems the next time there's a sourceful upload),
surely we can't possibly have a shortage of developers with i386 systems
to do this build?
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cannot switch.
It'll break d-i testing if you change exim4 before a new d-i release
candidate is made, and since we're only planning one more d-i release
candidate for sarge I doubt that you'll get this into sarge anyway. This
is exactly why the base system was frozen.
--
Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 12:26:28PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
the release notes need to contain a note to users using the german
locale along the lines:
The contact address for the release notes is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but you may want
treat is RC for sarge nonetheless (?)
Normally, build daemons have a package that provides
mail-transport-agent already installed; ssmtp is the usual choice.
Andreas, I suggest you configure your build daemon this way. I don't
think this is RC for sarge.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
. It would make life much easier for CD/DVD production if we can
just drop the non-US stuff, and there's clearly very little left
there. Shall we just drop it?
I tend to think that would be a good idea, yes.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to change the version in unstable, make the version
you upload to testing be something like 0.11.14-0sarge1 instead. This
allows us to preserve sane upgrades from testing to unstable.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. To break this deadlock, we need upgrade kernel packages
so that there's something to which we can point users in the release
notes.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is usually pretty reliable at getting the intersection right,
and they do listen to the maintainer.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in your mail; what's the new boost needed for?
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for removal:
# ROM, #271096
remove qgo/0.2.1-1
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ready for entering
sarge.
As it is a package from the base system, it is my understanding that
the release team needs allowing it to enter sarge...So, if you're OK
with that, please:-)
Approved.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 11:07:09PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
A bug in util-linux (#216567) is not fixed in sarge. This makes the
package uninstallable on s390x kernels, which are shiped in sarge.
I've given util-linux 2.12-7 a freeze exception.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
package
see end of thread - #250478
Since there wasn't an explicit removal request: Yann, are you OK with
kernel-patch-acl being removed from testing? (If so, should it not be
removed from unstable as well? In that case, please file a bug against
ftp.debian.org.)
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
attention so that
I could downgrade it. :-)
(The grave severity implies the package is unusable, which libc6-dev
isn't; it doesn't seem to fit any of the criteria for serious bugs in
the release policy, either.)
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Colin Watson wrote:
* Please make sure to get all the libraries through as quickly as
possible to reduce the impact on the rest of the distribution.
Upload with urgency=low to start
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:51:27AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 05:48:44PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 07:38:59PM +0200, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
This point is self-contradictory and spells disaster:
1) You cannot have a rapid deployment
-locale-pl are in incoming;
they should get back into testing reasonably quickly.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
does not produce static libraries, only
kdepim does currently and just started with 3.3.0.
That's fine by me personally; I think this is a minor and justifiable
infraction.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? What about on s390? Lets
face it, its hard to get things to work exactly right on what, 11
architectures?
That's not what's delaying the release. It rather rarely is. The job
that's currently blocking testing-security, last I heard, is central,
not per-architecture.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
the bugs are fixed.
I've marked it for removal at the next britney run.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
zip | 2.30-8 | unstable | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64,
m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
know about, although I'm sure the single issue requires multiple changes
to the archive configuration to fix. I shouldn't have put it that way,
though.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on a floppy).
Do these messages this apply to the /dev inside the initrd?? FWIW, the
machine does not use udev or devfs.
Those messages indicate that the init in the initrd can't figure out how
to mount your real root partition.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL
-interactive
authentication when PermitRootLogin is not set to yes and the correct
root password is entered (closes: #248747).
-- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 28 Nov 2004 12:37:16 +
This doesn't seem to have introduced any new regressions, and I consider
the two information leaks
Frost. Closes: #283529.
Not a dangerous change. It is even possible that the produced
executables are the same as in 3.22-9.
Approved.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 05:32:40PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
doc-linux 2004.11-1 is in unstable for 20 days and only contains the
usual monthly update stuff. Please approve it for sarge.
Approved.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, so it's
as critical as it gets.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not strictly needed but adds a sane default for the
config on s390x kernels.
Changelog:
modutils (2.4.26-1.2) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Fix chandev support on s390x kernels. (closes: #284960)
* Add arch config for s390x.
Approved.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
the priority
changed. Fortunately, the current quik maintainer scripts check the
subarchitecture themselves to avoid doing harmful things on other
systems.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oct 2004 14:21:42 +0200
Belatedly approved (4.6.25, actually).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
old.
Urgency bumped.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by uploading 1.2.2.
In future please upload security fixes with urgency=high rather than
urgency=low, and then for non-frozen packages you probably won't need to
contact the release team at all.
I've raised the urgency for you, so renattach 1.2.2-1 should go into
testing tonight.
Cheers,
--
Colin
Changelog since groff 1.18.1.1-3 in sarge:
groff (1.18.1.1-5) unstable; urgency=high
* Upstream fix for temporary file handling vulnerability in pic2graph
(closes: #286371).
* Upstream fix for temporary file handling vulnerability in eqn2graph
(closes: #286372).
-- Colin Watson
it.
Since the package in sid is blocked by kdelibs and gcc-3.4, please
consider letting the package from t-p-u into sarge.
Still missing arm, mips, powerpc. Unstable's version is missing arm too.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, removed bash from Replaces field.
-- Santiago Vila [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue, 14 Dec 2004 19:06:00 +0100
Approved, thanks.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-3.3.5.
All approved. Thanks to you and others for your continuing hard work on
the toolchain!
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
succeeds. If it doesn't, we'll probably
just temporarily remove charmap.app.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this should be let into testing.
Approved. A bunch of stuff that mdz intended to be in apt 0.5.27.2
apparently isn't there, though, so if he could upload a new version
after today's dinstall that would be good.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a great deal of traffic, and
-release needs to be relatively clear so that the release managers can
be sure to read everything posted here. There are other lists mentioned
on lists.debian.org for the discussion of non-technical issues in the
project.
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson
. Use the mem=32M (etc.)
kernel parameter.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-setup, which is the bug.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; but I'll leave
that to him to announce in time!
Thanks,
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
buglist used as input by britney.
spohr temporarily ran low on disk space a day or two ago. I cleaned it
up as soon as I noticed by compressing some of the BTS' spam archives
(and I see Blars has since done more), but it's possible that this
temporarily broke the bug list.
--
Colin Watson
to stdout,
which is coupled to debconf and makes it fail.
Surely sarge kernel updates should be using the kernel-package in sarge,
namely 8.135. If there are changes needed from later versions of
kernel-package, they should be backported.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
