Bug#989825: unblock: user-mode-linux/5.10um3

2021-06-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
+ * [95d05ef] Drop patch um_mark_all_kernel_symbols_as_local.patch +(Closes: #989665) + * [bf8d469] Update UML Linux configs + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Fri, 11 Jun 2021 11:43:23 +0530 + user-mode-linux (5.10um2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Christopher Obbard ] diff -Nru user-mode-linux-5.10um2/debian/patche

Bug#987730: unblock: multipath-tools/0.8.5-1

2021-04-28 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
04-28 22:40:55.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +multipath-tools (0.8.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [373f5c5] Fix bashism in script kpartx/kpartx_id. +Thanks to Julien Cristau (Closes: #987669) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:40:55 +0530 + multipath-tools (0.8.5-1) uns

Bug#987730: unblock: multipath-tools/0.8.5-1

2021-04-28 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Dear Release Team, On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 22:50 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing > The revised debdiff patch is attached in this follow-up message. The initial patch was missing an important fix. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf

Bug#987730: unblock: multipath-tools/0.8.5-1

2021-04-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 21:49 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 22:50 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > >   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing > > > > > > > The revised debdiff patch is attache

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-04-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
iscsi-2.1.3/debian/changelog 2021-04-29 13:43:35.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +open-iscsi (2.1.3-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [47645a5] Make open-iscsi-udeb compatible with d-i. +Thanks to Cyril Brulebois (Closes: #987568) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:43:35 +0530 +

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-04-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
--- Version: [-2.1.3-2-] {+2.1.3-3+} I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report of `moreinfo`. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-04-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 20:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > The interim workaround is to ship the library into the open- > > > iscsi- > > udeb > > > package itself. >

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-04-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo +help On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 21:02 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Control: tag -1 -moreinfo > > On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 20:33 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-04-29 at 22:19 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > > The interim workar

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-05-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-4 Hello Paul, On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 22:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 30-04-2021 17:03, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report > > of > > `moreinfo`. &

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-05-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 22:04 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > That's not what I meant. I'll try to be more clear next time. > > > > You're debdiff showed only the content of the open-iscsi binary > > package > > (which wasn't affected by your

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

2021-05-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
team. The current migration status on the tracker page looks okay to me. The debdiff in between the versions from Testing and Unstable are attached with this email Thanks, Ritesh On Fri, 2021-05-14 at 21:56 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Ritesh, > > On 12-05-2021 18:27, Ritesh Raj Sar

Bug#929101: nmu: user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1

2019-05-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu user-mode-linux_4.19-1um-1 . ANY . buster . -m "" user-mode-linux depends on building itself from the linux-source package. Since the last upload, quite a few uploads for the linux-sour

Bug#979792: nmu: user-mode-linux_5.10um1

2021-01-11 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu user-mode-linux_5.10um1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Re-build package to pick latest Linux 5.10.5 changes" -- System Information: Debian Release: bullseye/sid APT prefers unstable APT pol

Bug#951572: buster-pu: package uml-utilities/20070815.2-1

2020-02-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu The port-helper binary shipped with the uml-utilities package was installed to a non-standard path creating problems for the uml tool to find the helper binary. Details are mentioned

Bug#951572: buster-pu: package uml-utilities/20070815.2-1

2020-02-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Control: tag -1 +patch Sorry to have missed to attach the debdiff. On Tue, 2020-02-18 at 13:49 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: buster > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > The port-helpe

Bug#951572: buster-pu: package uml-utilities/20070815.2-1

2020-02-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4, which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml-utilities package's first stable update proposed. Attached patch revises the version revision number. On Wed, 2020-02-19 at 12:06 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf

Bug#951572: buster-pu: package uml-utilities/20070815.2-1

2020-02-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Dear Adam, On Tue, 2020-02-25 at 21:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 15:37 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > So my changelog was incorrect as it set to 20070815.3-1+deb10u4, > > which actually should be 20070815.3-1+deb10u1, as this is uml- > > util

Bug#814716: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1

2016-02-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
line-1.5.2/apt_offline_core/AptOfflineCoreLib.py 2016-02-14 20:53:21.0 +0530 @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ app_name = "apt-offline" -version = "1.5" +version = "1.5.2" myCopyright = "(C) 2005 - 2014 Ritesh Raj Sarraf" terminal_license = "This progra

Bug#814716: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1

2016-02-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 15:53 +1100, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Bug 1: apt-offline only look into /etc/apt/trusted.gpg for key > > verification. This results in most apt data not to be installed > because > > t

Bug#814716: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1

2016-02-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
> configuration files that are currently being used. Otherwise > apt-offline isn't doing the right thing and also won't be usable > inside apt-venv or chdist. Thanks for this information. I'll add it soon. When you say use apt's settings, you mean use the output of its pa

Bug#814716: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5.1

2016-02-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Yes. I'll be sending a revised patch soon. s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On 20-Feb-2016 20:00, "Julien Cristau" wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 21:25:00 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org >

Bug#863107: unblock: laptop-mode-tools/1.71-2

2017-05-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
aptop-mode-tools (1.71-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Backport patch from upstream. fix-iw-txpower-issue.patch +This fixes syntax errors with the newer 'iw' command +Thanks: Rowan Thorpe (Closes: #862975) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Mon, 22 May 2017 02:20:16 +0545 + lapto

Bug#863862: jessie-pu: package multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u2

2017-05-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
@@ +multipath-tools (0.5.0-6+deb8u3) jessie; urgency=medium + + * Refresh patches + * Fix segfault is either of vid/pid is missing in blacklist +(Closes: #751993) + * Add patch to fix device locking issue in between multipath and udev +(Closes: #799781) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Thu, 0

Bug#895263: RM: bpfcc/0.3.0-4

2018-04-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Please remove bpfcc version 0.3.0-4 from the archives. These are outdated binaries on unsupported architectures. With newer 0.5.0 release, we have narrowed down the list of architectures where b

Bug#898329: release.debian.org: bpfcc not migrating to testing

2018-05-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal As quoted in Debian Bug #898151 bpfcc didn't migrate to testing. I see you have tried to request RoM but still not migrated. After consulting on #debian-dev 12:18 I think it is because arch-all packages are depending on packages that only exist

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-10-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
+++ apt-offline-1.5.1/debian/changelog 2015-10-12 14:20:25.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +apt-offline (1.5.1) jessie; urgency=medium + + * [3726fa8] Use apt backend. python-apt doesn't really work +(Closes: #801502) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:19:48 +0530 + apt-offline (1.5) unstable; urgency=medium * New Major Release

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-10-12 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 19:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > Please see attached debdiff for the exact change. Please respond to > this > > bug report with an ACK and then I'll upload it to the archive. > >

Bug#801851: jessie-pu: package multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u1

2015-10-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
iendly names +scenarios. Thanks to Scott Moser (Closes: #788841) + * [af3f228] init: Fix stop failure when no root device is found +(Closes: #795278) + * [b77859e] Add debian/gbp.conf to use pristine-tar branch + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:16:45 +0530 + multi

Bug#801851: jessie-pu: package multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u1

2015-10-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2015-10-20 at 20:18 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Thu, 2015-10-15 at 15:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > This update to multipath-tools fixes a couple of problems. Details > > are > > referenced in the changelog, and

Bug#801851: jessie-pu: package multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u1

2015-10-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ploads to > security > would frequently break both assumptions. I have updated the changelog to +deb8u2 and uploaded it. Thanks. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#801851: jessie-pu: package multipath-tools/0.5.0-6+deb8u1

2015-10-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 19:33 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Querying the version didn't imply an ack on the remainder of the > diff, > fwiw... Oh!!.. No problem. Please let me know if there are concerns/questions over the proposed changes. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.d

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-10-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:12 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > @Release Managers: Please find attached the revised debdiff. Please > ACK. Dear Release Managers, The revised patch should be good for Jessie. Paul Wise has also provided feedback on this patch. Can you please ACK

Bug#803368: RM: ioapps/1.4r2-4

2015-10-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Upstream is dead. I have email him multiple times and had no response. Even the Google Code page, which now Google has shutdown, has not been migrated to a new home. There is no point in maintai

Bug#803368: RM: ioapps/1.4r2-4

2015-10-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
is no point in maintaining something where the upstream is > > inactive. > > Is this for testing/sid or for stable? This should apply only to testing/sid version. The one is stable is not plagued by any bug, so we can leave it as it is. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-11-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Dear Release Team, Can you please give me an ACK so that I can go ahead and upload ? If the change is objectionable, please state that either. Ritesh On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 16:49 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:12 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wr

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-11-17 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tue, 2015-11-17 at 21:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I guess the best bet for Jessie is to just add python-apt to > Depends. > > I'll send a revised patch. I agree we shouldn't change anything > else > > for the Jessie build. > > Please go ahead.

Bug#801580: jessie-pu: package apt-offline/1.5

2015-11-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ject the previous one. It'd help if you can respond in this email when it is okay for me to upload. I'll upload it after I receive the rejection email for the previous upload. Hope that is okay. Thanks. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal

Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: open-iscsi: 2.0.870~rc3-0.4.1: CVE-2009-1297: BTS 547011

2010-03-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Message -- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: open-iscsi: 2.0.870~rc3-0.4.1: CVE-2009-1297: BTS 547011 Date: Friday 19 Feb 2010, 14:55:48 From: Guido Günther To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf Hi Ritesh, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:09:03AM +0545, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Guido, > > Do we need t

Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: open-iscsi: 2.0.870~rc3-0.4.1: CVE-2009-1297: BTS 547011

2010-03-05 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Adam, I have completed the upload. Please let me know if there is anything more I need to do. On Friday 05 Mar 2010 12:01:03 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 09:24 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Attached patch fixes the open-iscsi version currently in L

iscsitarget: 0.4.16+svn162-3: CVE-2010-0743: BTS 574935

2010-04-24 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-2010-0743 (Closes: #574935) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Sun, 25 Apr 2010 11:51:35 +0530 + --- iscsitarget-0.4.16+svn162.orig/usr/isns.c +++ iscsitarget-0.4.16+svn162/usr/isns.c @@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ tlv = (struct isns_tlv *) hdr->pdu; if (name) - snprintf(mgmt-&g

Fwd: iscsitarget_0.4.16+svn162-3.1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-04-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
anges REJECTED Date: Monday 26 Apr 2010, 17:33:04 From: Archive Administrator To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf , Philipp Hug Reject Reasons: iscsitarget_0.4.16+svn162-3.1_amd64.changes file already known to dak Notes: Mapping stable to proposed-updates. === Please feel free to respond to this email if you

apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
is simply to skip sub-directories. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 000..0356424 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +*.pyc +.project

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
he --bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), `less` invocation does not come into picture. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:48:04 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > offline bug reports is one of the feature for apt-offline. If the > --bug-reports option was not used (or no bug reports were found), `less` > invocation does not come into picture. And adding support for `more` will be more ap

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-08-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
d prefer a Depends tbh. Okay! Done. Patch attached. Can you give me a "Yes" so that I can go ahead with the upload ? Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 ind

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Mehdi/Release Team, apt-offline has still not migrated to Squeeze (13 days). Is there any action required at my end ? Ritesh On Friday 20 Aug 2010 17:35:01 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 08/20/2010 02:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Friday 20 Aug 2010 16:49:33 Mehdi Dog

Re: apt-offline bug fix exception

2010-09-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Thanks Adam. On Friday 03 Sep 2010 20:31:19 Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 18:58 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > apt-offline has still not migrated to Squeeze (13 days). > > Is there any action required at my end ? > > It's generally helpful if you l

Bug#640794: RM: fusecompress/2.6.git913897f4-1

2011-09-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm The fusecompress package is buggy. There have been reports of data corruption. I've pinged upstream many times but haven't heard. The package is already been orphaned. With no maintainer, I don'

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"

2011-10-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
against the previous version in squeeze. I've built it on my Squeeze pbuilder. Ritesh On 10/15/2011 12:37 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Please don't do an upload only with this fix. There are 2 more bug > reports that I'd like to see fixed for stable-proposed-updates. >

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"

2011-10-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 10/31/2011 06:33 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, October 31, 2011 08:11, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> > Hello Release Team, >> > >> > I would like to propose an update to the multipath-tools package for >> > Squeeze. This proposed upload fixes 2

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"

2011-11-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
t Ex: sda , sd.e > > s/can be of/can be in/g Done. Please review the attached debdiff patch and let me know when to proceed. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System diff -Nru multipath-tools-0.4.8+git0.761c66f/debian/changelog m

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"

2011-11-09 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Release Team, Any update for this request? On 11/03/2011 01:06 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Hello Adam, > > On 11/02/2011 01:08 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > >> The hp_sw change looks fine. In terms of the documentation changes, is >> there an ETA for getting t

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler "1 hp-sw"

2011-11-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
r priority. >> > >> > s/number/&s/ > With that change, please go ahead. Thank you. Done for the stable release and uploaded to stable-proposed-updates. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
w that with the new social contract, all > documentation needs to adhere to the DFSG. The biggest impact of this > change is that documentation that is licensed only under the current > version of the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) needs to be made > available under a license t

Volunteer

2005-05-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
y help to the Debian community. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT -- http://www.researchut.com Gnupg Key ID: 04F130BC "Stealing logic from one person is plagiarism, stealing from many is research." "Necessity is the mother of invention." pgpxlBLjv2nTz.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Drop the minor release number

2005-07-08 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ix >> (for example), etc.pp. > > Counting numbers start at one. The first update would be the second > release of etch. So really it should be 4.1 for the first release of > etch and 4.2 for the second release and so on. > > Bob Hence, simply 4 (your way of saying) or 4.0 (othe

Bug#696039: unblock: laptop-mode-tools/1.61-1

2012-12-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
0 +++ laptop-mode-tools-1.61/debian/changelog 2012-12-15 20:34:33.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +laptop-mode-tools (1.61-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * [225fd1e] Disable ethernet based on multiple reports of driver failure + (Closes: #677638) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:34:11

Bug#696039: unblock: laptop-mode-tools/1.61-1

2012-12-15 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
If possible, please prepare the build and upload. I am currently out on vacation with very limited email access. On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usert

Bug#692495: unblock: sysprof/1.1.8-1

2012-12-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
up. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http://www.researchut.com "Necessity is the mother of invention." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://l

Re: Bug#677638: Bug#696039: unblock: laptop-mode-tools/1.61-1

2013-01-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
696039: unblock: laptop-mode-tools/1.61-1 Dear Release team, Could you please unblock laptop-mode-tools version 1.61-2, currently sitting in unstable ? This upload has very minimal change to disable, by default, the power savings on the e1000e driver. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf RESEARCHUT - http

Bug#692495: unblock: sysprof/1.1.8-1

2012-11-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
o correctly read debug symbols. +Thanks to Simon McVittie (Closes: #692372) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:12:56 +0530 + sysprof (1.1.8-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release (Closes: #634014) diff -Nru sysprof-1.1.8/debian/patches/series sysprof-1.1.8/debian/patches/series --

Bug#692495: unblock: sysprof/1.1.8-1

2012-11-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 01:39 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 01:24 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> > Please unblock package sysprof > Just to clarify, this hasn't been uploaded yet? No. Sorry. That is just t

multipath-tools 0.6.4-4 debdiff review

2017-02-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
1-25 14:58:53.0 +0530 +++ multipath-tools-0.6.4/debian/changelog 2017-02-20 19:36:31.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +multipath-tools (0.6.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Ritesh Raj Sarraf ] + * [65ba796] Fix path for udevadm, which now resides in /bin. +Thanks to Michael Bie

Bug#855824: unblock: multipath-tools/0.6.4-4

2017-02-22 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
+0530 @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +multipath-tools (0.6.4-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Ritesh Raj Sarraf ] + * [65ba796] Fix path for udevadm, which now resides in /bin. +Thanks to Michael Biebl (Closes: #852586) + * [5291947] Drop non-existent dm-emc module and include +dm-round-robin, i

Bug#856550: unblock: systemtap/3.0-8

2017-03-02 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
e1] Add patch to set correct messaging about debug symbol +packages (Closes: #856460) + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:52:57 +0530 + systemtap (3.0-7) unstable; urgency=medium * d/patches: support for 4.7 kernel by applying upstream patch. diff -Nru systemtap-3.0/debian/cont

Bug#856716: unblock: systemtap/3.1-1

2017-03-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Team, This has ended up being quite late, but I request you to grant exception for systemtap (3.1), which is currently in Experimental. systemtap depends very closely on the

Bug#856918: nmu: user-mode-linux_4.9-1um-1

2017-03-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Dear Release Team, Now that Stretch is frozen, I am requesting a rebuild of User Mode Linux. User Mode Linux is built from the same Linux sources present in the Debian archive. The version

Bug#856716: unblock: systemtap/3.1-1

2017-03-10 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2017-03-04 at 15:11 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > This bug report is in regard to asking for an exception for systemtap, > to allow a new release, at this time during freeze. > > Please let me know, in this bug report, if it is okay. And accordingly, > then, I will

Bug#858376: unblock: chrome-gnome-shell/8-4

2017-03-21 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
and add pointers to browser extension. +Thanks to Jeremy Bicha (Closes: #851479) + * Fix typo in spelling. Thanks Michael Biebl + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:18:29 +0530 + chrome-gnome-shell (8-3) unstable; urgency=medium * [0f30fa7] Cherry pick fixes from upstream,

Bug#858551: unblock: dico/2.3-2

2017-03-23 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
09-15 16:37:49.0 +0530 +++ dico-2.3/debian/changelog 2017-03-23 16:37:24.0 +0530 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +dico (2.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Drop broken link to non-existent file. +Thanks to Andreas Beckmann (Closes: #858511) + * Add dependency on lsb-base for SysV init script +

Bug#855824: unblock: multipath-tools/0.6.4-4

2017-03-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Please unblock package multipath-tools > > > > Th

Bug#859102: unblock: dict-gcide/0.48.4

2017-03-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dict-gcide In the 0.48.3 upload, I messed up the build. That resulted in bug #858875 This new upload, 0.48.4, just makes some minor build tool changes. Specifics are

Bug#855824: unblock: multipath-tools/0.6.4-4

2017-04-01 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sat, 2017-04-01 at 01:23 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf (2017-03-25): > > While you are at it, please consider unblocking version 0.6.4-5 > > The debdiff is attached. The changes include shipping udev rules files, > which > > mistakenly was dropped

Bug#768436: unblock: rtslib/3.0+git0.86e46bc6-4

2014-11-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
c6-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [acc103e] Install the policy files. +Thanks to Jerome Martin (Closes: #764355) + * [6cb7aac] Add dh-python to build-depends + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Tue, 04 Nov 2014 20:52:09 +0530 + rtslib (3.0+git0.86e46bc6-3) unstable; urgency=medium * [5274ed0] Add some D

Bug#768436: unblock: rtslib/3.0+git0.86e46bc6-4

2014-11-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On 11/07/2014 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > It also adds dh-python to build-deps, which afaict does not fix any bug? Yes. I think the build logs were reporting and requesting that dependency. I was not much harm in adding it. Do you want it reverted ? -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | h

Bug#768436: unblock: rtslib/3.0+git0.86e46bc6-4

2014-11-07 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
n package to Build-Depends dh_lintian *** -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System diff -Nru rtslib-3.0+git0.86e46bc6/debian/changelog rtslib-3.0+git0.86e46bc6/debian/changelog --- rtslib-3.0+git0.86e46bc6/debian/changelog 2014-10-19

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-07-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? On Friday 13 July 2012 01:35 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Any updates of this exception request? > > > On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Hi Colin, >> >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf (10/07/2012): &

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-07-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf (29/07/2012): >> > Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? > That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin. Okay!! I hope he responds back soon. Otherwise please let me know your seco

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-08-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:48 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Ritesh Raj Sarraf (29/07/2012): >>>> Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? >> That,

Bug#684068: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873-3

2012-08-06 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package open-iscsi The migration to testing was blocked from long because of open-iscsi udebs not available on all architectures. Since I last fixed the build for specific ar

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-08-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Release Team, Another week with no update on this issue ? Even from Cyril's last comment, nothing much has happened. On Monday 06 August 2012 09:42 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Ritesh Raj Sarraf (06/08/2012): >> Release Team, >> >> Now that Beta 1 is out, what is

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-08-13 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
the partman side of the implementation), I am okay with reverting the udeb if that can speed up the process to push open-iscsi quickly into Wheezy. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-08-14 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 08:38 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:16:04AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: >> On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it >>> involves

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-08-19 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Monday 20 August 2012 12:41 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > There wasn't that much terminology in there. :-) > [2012-06-27] Accepted 2.0.873-3 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-06-26] Accepted 2.0.873-2 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-05-21] Accepted 2.0.873-1

Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy

2012-09-01 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
migration, I feel users of the package would be best served by allowing > the package to migrate so have added an unblock. Thank you. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

iscsitarget release exception for Wheezy

2012-09-16 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
attached. Thanks, Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 957132a..d79aab8 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@ +iscsitarget (1.4.20.2-11

Re: Bug#687925: diff for NMU version 1.4.20.2-10.1

2012-09-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ators unable + to login (connection RST) during the login phase + + http://blog.wpkg.org/2007/09/09/solving-reliability-and-scalability-problems-with-iscsi/ +*/ +#define INCOMING_MAX 255 On Monday 17 September 2012 10:28 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Monday 17 September 2012 08:41

Bug#774206: release.debian.org: broken/buggy linux-target stack in Jessie

2014-12-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: important The linux-target stack in Jessie is broken. It has many issues. After talking with the upstream maintainers, I put up a newer version in experimental. This build, though not bug free, is much better than what is currently slated for Jessie. I wo

Bug#774206: release.debian.org: broken/buggy linux-target stack in Jessie

2014-12-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
against targetcli. So, if we cannot accommodate this exception, I'd rather prefer to see LIO removed for Jessie. Because that'll make the user to explicitly download the package from Sid. Which will have a newer working version. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Deb

Bug#774206: release.debian.org: broken/buggy linux-target stack in Jessie

2015-01-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
;t be fixed. I don't have the resource to fix it at this point. BTW, targetcli got removed from testing because of that RC bug, yesterday. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-25 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
ke +the stop action on shutdown not be a noop. (systemd tracks service +state) + * Add dh-systemd to build-deps. + * Reorder #DEBHELPER# in postinst to not break upgrades (dh-systemd's +code has to be there before invoke-rc.d is called). + + [ Ritesh Raj Sarraf ] + * [fa0ce1c]

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hence the daemon handling is separated from the iSCSI sessions that are handled in-kernel. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#776310: unblock: virtualbox/4.3.18-dfsg-2

2015-01-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package virtualbox There were a bunch of CVEs that this upload has fixed. All details are present in bug #775888 unblock virtualbox/4.3.18-dfsg-2 -- System Information: Deb

Bug#776276: Bug#775778: Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-27 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
remote storage for a reason, when they want to consolidate everything at a central location. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-01-31 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Thanks. I'll upload a new revision later today s3nt fr0m a $martph0ne, excuse typ0s On Jan 31, 2015 3:59 PM, "Christian Seiler" wrote: > Am 31.01.2015 um 08:48 schrieb Ritesh Raj Sarraf: > > This is a follow-up on the comments that were made on changes to > open-i

Bug#776276: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873+git0.3b4b4500-4

2015-02-20 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Release Team, The last uploaded package is now 9 days old and hasn't migrated to Jessie. Does it not qualify for an exception at this timeline now ? On 01/31/2015 04:00 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > Thanks. I'll upload a new revision later today > > s3nt fr0

Bug#779701: unblock: multipath-tools/0.5.0-6

2015-03-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
status action. diff -Nru multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/NEWS multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/NEWS --- multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/NEWS 2014-09-05 18:05:17.0 +0530 +++ multipath-tools-0.5.0/debian/NEWS 2014-09-18 13:44:59.00000 +0530 @@ -12,19 +12,6 @@ -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Fri, 05 Sep 201

Bug#779701: unblock: multipath-tools/0.5.0-6

2015-03-04 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760189#16 > No remarks to the rest of the changes - I will leave those to the d-i > release manager once we got the "NEWS" file sorted out. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating Syst

systemtap doc fix exception

2010-09-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +systemtap (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Update README.Debian about kernel dependency + + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:20:34 +0530 + systemtap (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low [ Lucas Nussbaum ] diff -Nru systemtap-1.2/debian/README.Debian systemtap-1.2/debian

Re: systemtap doc fix exception

2010-09-30 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
and let us know once the package has been > accepted. > I've done the upload and it has been accepted. Ritesh -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System --- Begin Message --- Accepted: systemtap-client_1.2-2_amd64.deb to ma

  1   2   >