Processed: Re: Bug#1019258: nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2

2022-09-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 xapian-core 1.4.20-2
Bug #1019258 [release.debian.org] nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2
Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'xapian-core'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1019258 to the same values 
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1019258 to the same values 
previously set
Bug #1019258 [xapian-core] nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2
There is no source info for the package 'xapian-core' at version '1.4.20-2' 
with architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version '1.4.20-2'
Marked as found in versions 1.4.20-2.
> retitle -1 xapian-core: remove message about potential ABI mismatch
Bug #1019258 [xapian-core] nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2
Changed Bug title to 'xapian-core: remove message about potential ABI mismatch' 
from 'nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2'.

-- 
1019258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#1019258: nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2

2022-09-09 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: reassign -1 xapian-core 1.4.20-2
Control: retitle -1 xapian-core: remove message about potential ABI mismatch

On 2022-09-06 08:49:25 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@debian.org
> 
> nmu xapian-core_1.4.20-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with gcc 12"
> 
> discussion:
> 
> 03-09-2022 07:29:30 > bremner: olly: will there be a new version of xapian in 
> Debian testing compiled with gcc 12? the current version complains about 
> potential ABI mismatch
> 03-09-2022 15:40:40 < olly > i'm wondering about retiring that message - it 
> seems to do more harm than good at this point
> 03-09-2022 15:42:00 < olly > in the ~GCC3 days you'd get weird link failures 
> which people would waste time trying to debug, but the modern ABI changes all 
> seem to be obscure corner cases
> 03-09-2022 15:42:08 < olly > and the ABI changes frequently
> 03-09-2022 15:48:43 < olly > bremner: if you want to make an nmu so it gets 
> rebuilt with GCC 12 to sort it out for now that's fine with me
> 03-09-2022 15:49:15 > bremner: olly: that would just be a binNMU?
> 03-09-2022 15:49:50 < olly > : it certainly could be

Scheduled and reassigning this bug to xapian-core so that the removal of
the message is not forgotten.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher



Bug#1019258: nmu: xapian-core_1.4.20-2

2022-09-06 Thread David Bremner
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: o...@debian.org

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

nmu xapian-core_1.4.20-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with gcc 12"

discussion:

03-09-2022 07:29:30 > bremner: olly: will there be a new version of xapian in 
Debian testing compiled with gcc 12? the current version complains about 
potential ABI mismatch
03-09-2022 15:40:40 < olly > i'm wondering about retiring that message - it 
seems to do more harm than good at this point
03-09-2022 15:42:00 < olly > in the ~GCC3 days you'd get weird link failures 
which people would waste time trying to debug, but the modern ABI changes all 
seem to be obscure corner cases
03-09-2022 15:42:08 < olly > and the ABI changes frequently
03-09-2022 15:48:43 < olly > bremner: if you want to make an nmu so it gets 
rebuilt with GCC 12 to sort it out for now that's fine with me
03-09-2022 15:49:15 > bremner: olly: that would just be a binNMU?
03-09-2022 15:49:50 < olly > : it certainly could be

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=puHs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-