Hi Paul,
On 2023-04-30 07:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Please go ahead with your 04_ proposal and please remove the moreinfo
> tag once the upload happened.
In -7, there was a typo that broke installability for hipcc,
specifically a version contained a second colon where a dot was expected:
> [...]
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Paul,
On 2023-04-30 07:59, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> I may be misunderstanding something here. I interpreted your t-p-u hint
>> for the case where a fix via unstable wouldn't be possible because of
>> the dependency issue. The proposal, however would work via unstable.
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Christian,
On 29-04-2023 00:17, Christian Kastner wrote:
I asked you to *also* provide the diff between *current* unstable and
your proposal (via unstable), because "I was about to propose to upload
it to tpu" (2023-04-20).
Sure, the 04_ attachment is
Hi Paul,
On 2023-04-28 17:48, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 28-04-2023 00:58, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> So I split that diff into 02 (patches) and 03 (NOT-patches), also
>> attached.
>
> I think you forgot to add them.
I did, sorry.
>> Would a package with just the patches and the (*) changes be
Hi Christian,
On 28-04-2023 00:58, Christian Kastner wrote:
So I split that diff into 02 (patches) and 03 (NOT-patches), also attached.
I think you forgot to add them.
Would a package with just the patches and the (*) changes be acceptable?
I asked you to *also* provide the diff between
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Paul,
sorry this took a while.
On 2023-04-22 13:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 21-04-2023 23:43, Christian Kastner wrote:
>> The only way to do that with llvm-toolchain-15 from testing is by
>> changing the dependency libclang-rt-15-dev back to
>>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Paul,
just wanted to say sorry, this is taking a while.
On 2023-04-22 13:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> The only way to do that with llvm-toolchain-15 from testing is by
>> changing the dependency libclang-rt-15-dev back to
>> libclang-common-15-dev (the pre-split version).
>
> Hmm, so this
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 21-04-2023 23:43, Christian Kastner wrote:
In the event that llvm-toolchain-15 will not be allowed to migrate:
I would be surprised if llvm-toolchain-15 gets updated in bookworm.
there are some fixes in the current version of rocm-hipamd that really
should
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Paul,
On 2023-04-20 08:58, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long to respond (the moreinfo tag was still attached
> to the bug, so it didn't show up in my regular bts view, so please
> remove it when you reply).
done.
> On 16-03-2023 11:40, Christian
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi,
Sorry for taking so long to respond (the moreinfo tag was still attached
to the bug, so it didn't show up in my regular bts view, so please
remove it when you reply).
On 16-03-2023 11:40, Christian Kastner wrote:
Overall, the diff is a bit long (and has some irrelevant stuff), so
I'm
Hi all,
I feel responsible for several of the issues listed by Paul, as
my earlier activity matches the time frame of some of the
changes and problems.
Christian Kastner, on 2023-03-16:
> On 2023-03-16 10:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 16-03-2023 00:16, Christian Kastner
Hi Paul,
On 2023-03-16 10:31, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 16-03-2023 00:16, Christian Kastner
> wrote: For next time, can you please contact us earlier? We could
> have solved the earlier problems in testing-proposed-updates (in
> January), then we would now be in a
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #1032899 [release.debian.org] unblock: rocm-hipamd/5.2.3-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1032899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 16-03-2023 00:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
On 2023-03-13 18:28, Christian Kastner wrote:
[ Impact ]
The new versions are in far better shape: they've catched missing
dependencies, added patches, improved the build process, etc.
Apologies, I was only thinking
On 2023-03-13 18:28, Christian Kastner wrote:
> [ Impact ]
> The new versions are in far better shape: they've catched missing
> dependencies, added patches, improved the build process, etc.
Apologies, I was only thinking of the more recent releases.
Revision -2 fixed an RC bug in January, but
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: affects -1 + src:rocm-hipamd
Please unblock package rocm-hipamd
rocm-hipamd 5.2.3-1 has been in testing for a few months now, so have
the
21 matches
Mail list logo
