Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Uploaded into unstable. Cheers Anton
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
OK, agreed. Thanks Anton Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 21:13 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > > On 2026-03-04 20:41:30 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > I do not think so. I would do it together with all other NMUs. > > Then let's not. I'd prefer if we keep the work to complete the > transition low. The libboost-system-dev Provides at a latter point when > the transition is done. > > Cheers > > > > > Anton > > > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 19:52 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > > : > > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > > > On 2026-03-04 18:38:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > > > > > I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. > > > > Would it be OK? > > > > > > Have all reverse dependencies been updated yet? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > > > > > > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > > > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > > > > > > > > > Go ahead > > > > > > > > > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > > > > > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having > > > > > versioned > > > > > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > > > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > > > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > > > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > > > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > > > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > > > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > > > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
On 2026-03-04 20:41:30 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > I do not think so. I would do it together with all other NMUs. Then let's not. I'd prefer if we keep the work to complete the transition low. The libboost-system-dev Provides at a latter point when the transition is done. Cheers > > Anton > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 19:52 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > : > > > > Hi Anton > > > > On 2026-03-04 18:38:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > > > I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. > > > Would it be OK? > > > > Have all reverse dependencies been updated yet? > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > > > > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > > > > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > > > > > > > Go ahead > > > > > > > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > > > > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned > > > > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
I do not think so. I would do it together with all other NMUs. Anton Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 19:52 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > > Hi Anton > > On 2026-03-04 18:38:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Hi Sebastian, > > > > I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. > > Would it be OK? > > Have all reverse dependencies been updated yet? > > Cheers > > > > > Regards > > > > Anton > > > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > > : > > > > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > > > > > Go ahead > > > > > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > > > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned > > > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Hi Anton On 2026-03-04 18:38:59 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. > Would it be OK? Have all reverse dependencies been updated yet? Cheers > > Regards > > Anton > > Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher > : > > > > > Hi Anton > > > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > Severity: normal > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > > User: [email protected] > > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > > > Go ahead > > > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned > > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Hi Sebastian, I want to drop that "provides" field completely to fix them all at once. Would it be OK? Regards Anton Am Mi., 4. März 2026 um 15:22 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Ramacher : > > Hi Anton > > On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > > User: [email protected] > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > Dear release team, > > > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > > > Go ahead > > Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned > with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned > build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. > > Cheers > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > Anton > > > > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sebastian Ramacher > > > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Hi Anton On 2026-03-04 07:43:09 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html > > On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear release team, > > > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > > to the newest boost1.90 package. > > Go ahead Please make sure that the Provides of libboost-system-dev is versioned with (= ${binary:Version}) so that reverse dependencies having versioned build dependencies on libboost-system-dev are satisfied. Cheers > > Cheers > > > > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > > > Thank you. > > > > Anton > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "boost-defaults"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > > > > > > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Processed: Re: Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #1128860 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html Bug #1128860 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html'. -- 1128860: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1128860 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/boost1.90.html On 2026-02-23 20:33:39 +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] > Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults > User: [email protected] > Usertags: transition > > Dear release team, > > I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults > to the newest boost1.90 package. Go ahead Cheers > > Most of the affected packages have already been identified, > and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed > this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. > > https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 > > Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition > is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide > a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. > > This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining > bugs and help speed up the transition. > > Thank you. > > Anton > > > Ben file: > > title = "boost-defaults"; > is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ > "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; > is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; > > > > -- Sebastian Ramacher
Bug#1128860: transition: boost-defaults
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected] Control: affects -1 + src:boost-defaults User: [email protected] Usertags: transition -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, I hereby request a transition slot for boost-defaults to the newest boost1.90 package. Most of the affected packages have already been identified, and for builds that fail, bugs tagged boost1.90 were filed this month. Some of these issues have already been fixed. https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=any&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=boost1.90&fusertaguser=debian-devel%40lists.debian.org&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&format=html#results https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=boost1.90 Since Boost is one of the core C++ libraries and this transition is required for many packages, I kindly ask you to provide a transition slot even if not all bugs are fixed yet. This would allow us to increase the severity of the remaining bugs and help speed up the transition. Thank you. Anton Ben file: title = "boost-defaults"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8" | .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; is_good = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.90"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libboost[a-z-.]*1\.8"; -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQJFBAEBCgAvFiEEu71F6oGKuG/2fnKF0+Fzg8+n/wYFAmmcq5IRHGdsYWRrQGRl Ymlhbi5vcmcACgkQ0+Fzg8+n/wZJ6A/+NlEkxG43/jTRwFtwlMxxGxqIkCmJNwwO rXOZQ5VbC5mCdbVB3fg3GJKQoIdWPa+TdNLBElKcLpjD6BCHTffnJ/rUJ3aWdw2h fjwoi2NJeUit9DUbB8AFwbbyAFjDYeRiwpbrq16cVn0aXMcaRP1bwf5Va102pB37 AOpty5hFwvTRXSNYjIMJnPBf/mzd9sJPhF9nUrj1f7MwoLvBxJsav9PZw8R5No+9 G5Vd6ay3HKO0MhscyUTJS4h3O+CKZD1QqWi1brZ1pEDNmOz56FCkEpWzAWMqdV2+ hS/9M45JC+e1/Q8nauQhRNdSXXh7UZ73irLbis1mvtbGwSMs2VZOFhcK1rVCoakM oSrHLDNBE+8i34gZv25YF/N4rhssWbhoabDXWBz6tCALdwQ/jYhSsM1XVjDM2U+n VpUngn8QVk+WFdzQpQrVmIAamYeuQ94igdvqY8E6seMrBFeV2alVMqg+qINtCrRm /ZkCMB5cABlkOlU4YgE/pYWJQX1SuSn3fRMyIktIB6Pblf4BMUG2pHYaXuvnXuJL xh5FtRIGuzNV76FSSsifFqUKBJtvPqTAGwOHSocMU3aKpsp58E7zb1FqRQLdGGKY 2n6lE+8bB1is4/CHNvV/klN6vQwT47uUkp/iPT3BI0Oj7K8j8M7ypHmT7bkojUsQ jbPer6g6NuU= =Qgc1 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
