Bug#845304: firehol might need a binNMU

2016-12-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On 1 December 2016 at 15:37, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/12/16 17:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> ...if a binNMU can be done on arch:all. > > Not really. > >> If I try to upgrade my packages to the new libxtables apt wants to remove >> firehol, so I

Bug#845304: firehol might need a binNMU

2016-12-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 01/12/16 17:46, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > ...if a binNMU can be done on arch:all. Not really. > If I try to upgrade my packages to the new libxtables apt wants to remove > firehol, so I guess the parameters of the transition tracker are not just > right. Do you have an

Bug#845304: firehol might need a binNMU

2016-12-01 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
...if a binNMU can be done on arch:all. If I try to upgrade my packages to the new libxtables apt wants to remove firehol, so I guess the parameters of the transition tracker are not just right. thanks for your work! -- Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. --