On 08/03/2019 10:07, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 923694
>
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> meta-gnome3
Control: block -1 by 923694
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 923694
Bug #906016 [release.debian.org] transition: gjs built with mozjs60
906016 was blocked by: 906213 923778 913030 910372 910287 906333 904991 904994
906210 906214 913077 910285 910286
906016 was blocking: 922218
Added blocking bug(s) of 906
Hi,
Simon McVittie (2019-03-02):
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is
> > > > not
> > > > the full GNOME 3
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is not
> > > the full GNOME 3 desktop used on other architectures, for example
> > >
On 08/02/2019 17:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>> I'm not sure how to hide a particular entry on a particular arch; I'm
>> not a tasksel expert and won't be one in the next 5 minutes. But it
>> seems to me the immediate concern was about
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'm not sure how to hide a particular entry on a particular arch; I'm
> not a tasksel expert and won't be one in the next 5 minutes. But it
> seems to me the immediate concern was about the default desktop anyway,
> which shouldn't be
Hi,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2019-02-08):
> > On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 10:25:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >>> The options I can see are:
> >>>
> >>> * Accept that task-gnome-desktop is not going to be installable on s390x.
> >>> Change
Hi,
On 05/02/2019 11:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Please could we have a decision on this in plenty of time before the freeze?
> Given the upstream GC improvements aimed at mitigating or solving "the memory
> leak problem" in gjs 1.54.x, I am not comfortable with releasing buster with
> gjs 1.52.x
Please could we have a decision on this in plenty of time before the freeze?
Given the upstream GC improvements aimed at mitigating or solving "the memory
leak problem" in gjs 1.54.x, I am not comfortable with releasing buster with
gjs 1.52.x (which has a backport of those changes done by a
Hi Cyril,
On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
>>> on
>>> gnome, which is removed
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:30 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> time for trying to whip up a patch.
I don't see any value in delaying any longer. It's pretty easy to let
gjs/s390x back in; removing it has been quite
On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 12:01 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:29:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> > time for trying to whip up a patch.
>
> That seems fine, but please note that most
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:29:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> time for trying to whip up a patch.
That seems fine, but please note that most of the changes necessary to
remove gjs from s390x happened some time
Hi!
On 12/17/18 4:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> We might have a patch for s390x in openSUSE/SLE, I'll have a look. There
>> also might be one in Fedora we could pick for Debian.
>>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488552 is what I was
> hitting last time around. That got
On 12/17/18 4:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/17/18 3:56 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> gjs recently switched from mozjs52 to mozjs60, and mozjs60 doesn't work
>> on s390x (#909536; about 80% of its tests fail, which means I have no
>> confidence that the resulting binaries would be
On 12/17/18 3:56 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> gjs recently switched from mozjs52 to mozjs60, and mozjs60 doesn't work
> on s390x (#909536; about 80% of its tests fail, which means I have no
> confidence that the resulting binaries would be useful or usable if
> we ignored the test failures).
This
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
> > on
> > gnome, which is removed from s390x. I'm not comfortable breaking that, you'd
> >
On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/12/2018 09:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 12/12/2018 19:55, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 at 20:47:38 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:10:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
On 13/12/2018 09:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 12/12/2018 19:55, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 at 20:47:38 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:10:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Please go ahead.
>>>
>>> I have uploaded the new gjs, and
On 12/12/2018 19:55, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 at 20:47:38 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:10:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Please go ahead.
>>
>> I have uploaded the new gjs, and Jeremy uploaded the matching polari
>> version.
>
> gjs has
On Sat, 03 Nov 2018 at 20:47:38 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:10:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > Please go ahead.
>
> I have uploaded the new gjs, and Jeremy uploaded the matching polari
> version.
gjs has been waiting to migrate for a while, with no
You won't need to remove:
gnome-weather (now arch:all)
gpaste (the GNOME Shell extension is arch:all & the gjs dependency has
been moved to B-D-I)
seed-webkit2 (never built on s390x)
workrave (GNOME panel applet no longer built on s390x)
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 20:10:52 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 10/10/2018 12:41, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 10:13:32 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> >> On 05/10/2018 10:10, Simon McVittie wrote:
> >>> The new mozjs version does not work on s390x, so to make
On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 03:11:00PM -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I found a few more dependencies today:
> gnome-initial-setup
> gnome-panel
And gnome-applets falls out from gnome-panel.
... Adam
I found a few more dependencies today:
gnome-initial-setup
gnome-panel
sssd
sssd doesn't need gdm3 so I opened
https://salsa.debian.org/sssd-team/sssd/merge_requests/3
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 10/10/2018 12:41, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 10:13:32 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 05/10/2018 10:10, Simon McVittie wrote:
>>> The new mozjs version does not work on s390x, so to make gjs migrate,
>>> we will need to do
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #906016 [release.debian.org] transition: gjs built with mozjs60
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
906016: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Am 10.10.2018 um 12:41 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> Not in the short term. Moving to a new mozjs version is a major change
> that needs to be coordinated with cjs upstream. Unfortunately, cjs
> upstream seem to be refusing to consider any request coming from Debian
> until unrelated (?) bugs are
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 10:13:32 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 05/10/2018 10:10, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The new mozjs version does not work on s390x, so to make gjs migrate,
> > we will need to do architecture-specific removals (I'm not sure whether
> > this should be from testing or
On 05/10/2018 10:10, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> I think we're ready to upload gjs 1.54 to unstable for wider testing,
> and Ubuntu are already doing the same thing. This could cause some
> disruption in unstable, and will not migrate without removing some
> packages
On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 8:40 PM Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> It might be possible to make gnome-sound-recorder arch: all.
Yes, you can remove gnome-sound-recorder from your list.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 4:11 AM Simon McVittie wrote:
> Removing gnome-shell also means we have to remove gdm3, gnome-session, and
> various GNOME Shell extensions and other GNOME-Shell-dependent packages
> from s390x. Perhaps someone from Ubuntu can advise on which ones? I
> tried using "dak rm
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #906016 [release.debian.org] transition: gjs built with mozjs60
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
906016: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906016
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
I think we're ready to upload gjs 1.54 to unstable for wider testing,
and Ubuntu are already doing the same thing. This could cause some
disruption in unstable, and will not migrate without removing some
packages on s390x, but does not require a mass-rebuild of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-gtk-gn...@lists.debian.org
Control: block -1 by 904991 904994
libgjs.so.0 currently uses Spidermonkey 52 (mozjs52) and is packaged as
libgjs0g. The
36 matches
Mail list logo
