On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 09:28:18PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Ping on a new upload? There's just over a week if you want to get this
> in to 9.10.
Thanks for the reminder; uploaded.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2019-02-23 at 22:41 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On 2/23/19 7:56 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019
On 2/23/19 7:56 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
I assume I can't just
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > > I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new.
> >
On 2/15/19 4:55 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
>> I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new.
>> Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload?
>
> Uploaded a new revision at the
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new.
> > Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload?
>
>
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new.
> Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload?
Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau.
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:21:44PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> > Didn't you do that? (Or your sponsor, I guess, but I still assumed you'd be
> > aware.)
> > [...]
> > I didn't remove anything, no. I have nothing to do with the package, just
> > looking at what's been proposed / uploaded
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:53:14PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:21:18AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > It seems the tags in the packaging repo do not actually match the
> > uploads
> > to the archive, and I do not know why: this is a team-maintained
> >
On 2018-09-08 01:00, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Adam,
Sorry for getting back to you this late.
Likewise apologies for overlooking the response for so long.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:21:18AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Why
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Hi Adam,
Sorry for getting back to you this late.
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 08:21:18AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Why does the diff contain (and not mention):
>
> upstream-signing-key.pgp
> 1451 ---
>
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #906258 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
906258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #906258 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #906258 to the same tags previously set
--
906258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906258
Debian Bug Tracking
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2018-08-19 11:50, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:06:03AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
This isn't fixed in sid.
Yes, gwolf sponsored the upload, but it was rejected as his new signing
subkey isn't yet in
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 10:06:03AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> This isn't fixed in sid.
Yes, gwolf sponsored the upload, but it was rejected as his new signing
subkey isn't yet in debian-keyring; I requested jcc@d.o to sponsor the
upload instead.
Best,
nicoo
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #906258 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
906258: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906258
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #906258 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> tag -1 - security
Bug #906258 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
Removed tag(s) security.
--
906258:
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Control: tag -1 - security
On 08/16/2018 10:01 AM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: stretch security
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: block 906128 by -1
>
> Hi,
>
> I would
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch security
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: block 906128 by -1
Hi,
I would like to upload a fix for #906128 (CVE-2018-14779 and CVE-2018-14780)
to stretch-pu; I already backported the fix from upstream to
19 matches
Mail list logo
