Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Saturday 01 September 2012 12:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Thanks for bearing with us. Having looked over both the Debian and upstream changelogs and taking in to account that no significant issues have been found and the part we played in delaying both the review and migration, I feel users of the package would be best served by allowing the package to migrate so have added an unblock. Thank you. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 23:51 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in testing and the version in unstable. The size of the changes means that it'll take some time to go through. Reducing the size of that job by producing a filtered diff that excludes e.g. documentation and test-suite changes would likely help. Unless the udeb changes touched anything outside of debian/ (which I would suspect they didn't) then dropping those changes now is unlikely to make any material difference to the size of the diff. I understand your point now. Thank you for explaining. That indeed is a lot of changes in the open-iscsi package. I will wait for your review. Thanks for bearing with us. Having looked over both the Debian and upstream changelogs and taking in to account that no significant issues have been found and the part we played in delaying both the review and migration, I feel users of the package would be best served by allowing the package to migrate so have added an unblock. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1346440812.7606.13.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:12:19PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (06/08/2012): Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it. I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. I'd still be happy to hear back from Colin. ;) Sorry for not replying! Yes, I think this was a reasonable thing to allow into testing - I have a feeling it will require special arrangements to make use of it anyway, so it should be harmless. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120823163718.gc8...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Wed, 2012-08-15 at 03:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Tuesday 14 August 2012 08:38 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:16:04AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being part of the release. Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the Wheezy release? Did you read (and understand) what he wrote? Forgive me, not sure. I did read, but am not well versed with all your terminologies here. There wasn't that much terminology in there. :-) Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in testing and the version in unstable. The size of the changes means that it'll take some time to go through. Reducing the size of that job by producing a filtered diff that excludes e.g. documentation and test-suite changes would likely help. Unless the udeb changes touched anything outside of debian/ (which I would suspect they didn't) then dropping those changes now is unlikely to make any material difference to the size of the diff. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1345403474.31960.139.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Monday 20 August 2012 12:41 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: There wasn't that much terminology in there. :-) [2012-06-27] Accepted 2.0.873-3 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-06-26] Accepted 2.0.873-2 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-05-21] Accepted 2.0.873-1 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-04-24] Accepted 2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-2 in unstable (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2012-04-09] Accepted 2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-1 in experimental (low) (Ritesh Raj Sarraf) [2011-09-25] open-iscsi 2.0.872-2 MIGRATED to testing (Britney) When the udeb package got introduced (In version 2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-1), the package never migrated to testing. I will file a feature request against the PTS that when packages don't migrate, because of issues, emails should be sent to the packager. All this time, I was under the impression that that version had already migrated to testing. I take that as my fault. Essentially, a member of the release team needs to decide that they're happy with the changes between the current version of open-iscsi in testing and the version in unstable. The size of the changes means that it'll take some time to go through. Reducing the size of that job by producing a filtered diff that excludes e.g. documentation and test-suite changes would likely help. Unless the udeb changes touched anything outside of debian/ (which I would suspect they didn't) then dropping those changes now is unlikely to make any material difference to the size of the diff. I understand your point now. Thank you for explaining. That indeed is a lot of changes in the open-iscsi package. I will wait for your review. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:16:04AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being part of the release. Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the Wheezy release? Did you read (and understand) what he wrote? Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Tuesday 14 August 2012 08:38 PM, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 03:16:04AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being part of the release. Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the Wheezy release? Did you read (and understand) what he wrote? Forgive me, not sure. I did read, but am not well versed with all your terminologies here. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Release Team, Another week with no update on this issue ? Even from Cyril's last comment, nothing much has happened. On Monday 06 August 2012 09:42 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (06/08/2012): Release Team, Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it. I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. I'd still be happy to hear back from Colin. ;) Mraw, KiBi. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On 13.08.2012 19:45, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: Release Team, Another week with no update on this issue ? Even from Cyril's last comment, nothing much has happened. The comment in question being: ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being part of the release. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/68ac2165a9027803ae46586967362...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Dear Adam, On Monday 13 August 2012 07:40 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Even from Cyril's last comment, nothing much has happened. The comment in question being: ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. The main issue, at least from my perspective, is that unblocking it involves reviewing the diff, and the raw diffstat for that is 115 files changed, 8649 insertions(+), 30599 deletions(-) which doesn't make for quick processing. Even if the block-udeb was the only thing standing in the way of earlier automatic migration, an unblock is still essentially signing off on the relevant changes being part of the release. Okay! But will this version 2.0.873-3 of open-iscsi, make it to the Wheezy release? If it is being pushed off to another beta/rc, it is okay. Just that we will miss of some testing. If it doesn't make it to Wheezy, it will be a disappointment. I just checked the sources for debian-installer (version 20120712). From what I found, It does not have anything related to iscsi in it. Given that the iscsi installer support is half baked (i.e. it does not have the partman side of the implementation), I am okay with reverting the udeb if that can speed up the process to push open-iscsi quickly into Wheezy. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Release Team, Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it. I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:48 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (29/07/2012): Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin. Okay!! I hope he responds back soon. Otherwise please let me know your secondary plan of action. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (06/08/2012): Release Team, Now that Beta 1 is out, what is the status on this request? Will this migrate to testing? As the maintainer, let me know if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. PS: If the new udeb is too big a problem, let me know. I will revert it. I hope we can close this soon. The more it is delayed, the lesser testing it gets, if any. ACK for d-i. Feel free to unblock it. I'd still be happy to hear back from Colin. ;) Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ?
On Friday 13 July 2012 01:35 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
Any updates of this exception request?
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable, this email
is a request for freeze exception (including udeb freeze exception)
for the open-iscsi package.
The current excuses reported are:
Excuse for open-iscsi
* 12 days old (needed 10 days)
* Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (contact
debian-release if update is needed)
* Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by
freeze-exception
* Updating open-iscsi fixes old bugs: #645752
http://bugs.debian.org/645752
* Not considered
I see you added the udeb to open-iscsi; do you want it to migrate
right now? Or should that wait after beta 1?
Ping based on:
| cbrulebois@Cygnus:~/debian-installer(0)$ grep open-iscsi-udeb -r .
| ./packages/partman-iscsi/debian/control:Depends: ${misc:Depends},
partman-base (= 114), cdebconf-udeb (= 0.133), di-utils (= 1.66),
open-iscsi-udeb
and:
| +open-iscsi (2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-1) experimental; urgency=low
| […]
| + [ Colin Watson ]
| + * [156b745] open-iscsi: add a udeb (Closes: #635161)
| +
| + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:02:37 +0530
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (29/07/2012): Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
On Sunday 29 July 2012 03:36 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (29/07/2012): Any updates? Is it being held for Beta 1 ? That, plus I still haven't heard back from Colin. Okay!! I hope he responds back soon. Otherwise please let me know your secondary plan of action. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Any updates of this exception request?
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable, this email
is a request for freeze exception (including udeb freeze exception)
for the open-iscsi package.
The current excuses reported are:
Excuse for open-iscsi
* 12 days old (needed 10 days)
* Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (contact
debian-release if update is needed)
* Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by
freeze-exception
* Updating open-iscsi fixes old bugs: #645752
http://bugs.debian.org/645752
* Not considered
I see you added the udeb to open-iscsi; do you want it to migrate
right now? Or should that wait after beta 1?
Ping based on:
| cbrulebois@Cygnus:~/debian-installer(0)$ grep open-iscsi-udeb -r .
| ./packages/partman-iscsi/debian/control:Depends: ${misc:Depends},
partman-base (= 114), cdebconf-udeb (= 0.133), di-utils (= 1.66),
open-iscsi-udeb
and:
| +open-iscsi (2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-1) experimental; urgency=low
| […]
| + [ Colin Watson ]
| + * [156b745] open-iscsi: add a udeb (Closes: #635161)
| +
| + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:02:37 +0530
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs
Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: open-iscsi freeze exception for Wheezy
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable, this email
is a request for freeze exception (including udeb freeze exception)
for the open-iscsi package.
The current excuses reported are:
Excuse for open-iscsi
* 12 days old (needed 10 days)
* Not touching package due to block-udeb request by freeze (contact
debian-release if update is needed)
* Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by
freeze-exception
* Updating open-iscsi fixes old bugs: #645752
http://bugs.debian.org/645752
* Not considered
I see you added the udeb to open-iscsi; do you want it to migrate
right now? Or should that wait after beta 1?
Ping based on:
| cbrulebois@Cygnus:~/debian-installer(0)$ grep open-iscsi-udeb -r .
| ./packages/partman-iscsi/debian/control:Depends: ${misc:Depends},
partman-base (= 114), cdebconf-udeb (= 0.133), di-utils (= 1.66),
open-iscsi-udeb
and:
| +open-iscsi (2.0.872+git0.6676a1cf-1) experimental; urgency=low
| […]
| + [ Colin Watson ]
| + * [156b745] open-iscsi: add a udeb (Closes: #635161)
| +
| + -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org Sat, 07 Apr 2012 21:02:37 +0530
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
