On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:39:06AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> All done and pushed to alioth.
Uploaded!
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:12:45AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> Can you please read the message below and let me know what you think?
Hi,
After having followed for a couple of years the Ruby BoF thanks to the
video streaming, I will attend to the event in person this year,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Since July is here in two days, shouldn't we plan the next IRC meeting
(possibly discussing the issues after Ruby 2.2, I guess)? This time,
can we have the time slot a little bit early compared to the last one?
- --
Regards
Balasankar C
http://b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On ഞായര് 28 ജൂണ് 2015 11:26 രാവിലെ, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:07:01AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
>> Hi, I've packaged the gem 'slack-notifer' which is in the
>> runtime dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:07:01AM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi,
> I've packaged the gem 'slack-notifer' which is in the runtime
> dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy and builds fine in a
> chroot (sbuild). I've pushed it to our alioth repo and is available as
> ruby-slack-notif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I've packaged the gem 'slack-notifer' which is in the runtime
dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy and builds fine in a
chroot (sbuild). I've pushed it to our alioth repo and is available as
ruby-slack-notifier.
Please review and uplo
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 12:49:10AM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> Hi team!
> Please upload ruby-solve, it's required for berkshelf.
Uploaded!
Cheers,
Cédric
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:35:37PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > Ok. Can you drop then the build-dep on libev-dev?
> Done!
Another thing, in the debian/copyright file, the license for ext/libev/*
is BSD-2-clause or GPL-2+. Instead of one standalone Licens
On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Ok. Can you drop then the build-dep on libev-dev?
Done!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/CAAB-KcnOBFB+o85+vEA+G
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 03:02:14AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> OK - round two! I’ve replaced the source tar.gz file with the one containing
> specs and updated everything.
> Tests are now run, but require a new package called ruby-insist (ITP
> #789998) which I’ve packaged and p
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 07:44:28PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > I looked at ruby-nio4r. The package declares a build-dependency on
> > libev-dev, but doesn't seem to use it: the package has a convenience
> > copy of libev in ext, and uses the header from
On 6/27/15, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I looked at ruby-nio4r. The package declares a build-dependency on
> libev-dev, but doesn't seem to use it: the package has a convenience
> copy of libev in ext, and uses the header from there.
>
> Could you try to patch the source to make it use libev-dev,
Hi Hleb,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 07:19:48PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> Hi team!
> I've prepared NMU for ruby-celluloid, ruby-nio4r, ruby-celluloid-io.
> If nobody objects please upload them.
> - ruby-celluloid is patched for rspec3 compatibility (backported from
> upstream)
> - ruby-nio4r
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 01:46:21PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
> Hi,
> I am not sure that I understood completely, but please see inline.
> On ശനി 27 ജൂണ് 2015 01:32 വൈകു, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > The problem you have is that the upstream ta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I am not sure that I understood completely, but please see inline.
On ശനി 27 ജൂണ് 2015 01:32 വൈകു, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> The problem you have is that the upstream tarball you are using is
> not (strictly) the same as the one in the Debian
Hi
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 01:09:48PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been hit by an issue whenever I am trying to update a package.
> The issue is, when I update a package using gbp and try to dput the
> changes file, FTP masters reject it with a message like the one below
> ruby-cssm
Hi,
I have been hit by an issue whenever I am trying to update a package.
The issue is, when I update a package using gbp and try to dput the
changes file, FTP masters reject it with a message like the one below
ruby-cssmin_1.0.3-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for
ruby-cssmin_1.0.3.orig.tar.gz:
Accordi
17 matches
Mail list logo
