Re: RFS ruby-commander

Dear Mr. Christian I have installed rhc and executed a few of its commands in order to see if ithe application is running properly. As far as I can tell, I have not encountered any errors while using the package. Considering that ruby-commander is used to help parser command line options for rhc

Re: RFS: ruby-omniauth-remote-user 0.1.2-1

Thanks Christian! I made the necessary corrections . 2016-03-10 11:45 GMT-03:00 Christian Hofstaedtler : > Hi, > > * Thiago Ribeiro [160307 16:57]: > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded > > > > ruby-omniauth-remote-user(0.1.2-1) > >

Re: RFS: ruby-amq-protocol

> > > * Lucas Kanashiro [160310 04:14]: > > Hi guys, > > (Note that we sometimes have non-guys on this list as well.) > OK, sorry for that. > Unfortunately that will break ruby-amqp which has a '~> 1.9' > dependency on amq-protocol. > Maybe you can coordinate with

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-install, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

On 3/10/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> * ruby-mixlib-install > > Done/Uploaded. Thanks! >> * ruby-berkshelf-api-client > > Has distribution as UNSTABLE in d/changelog. > > For both, please fix the vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri vcs-git lintian Fixed. > hint. I /think/ the

Re: RFS ruby-commander

* Christian Hofstaedtler [160310 15:42]: > Hi, > > while looking at the RFS for ruby-commander, I noticed the new > version (4.4.0) will not fulfill the only rdep's dependencies: > > rhc depends commander >= 4.0.0 < 4.3.0 Uploaded for now, as commander in sid already doesnt

Re: RFS: ruby-amq-protocol

Hi, * Lucas Kanashiro [160310 04:14]: > Hi guys, (Note that we sometimes have non-guys on this list as well.) > I just updated ruby-amq-protocol with latest upstream release and I need > some sponsorship. The latest upstream version of ruby-bunny depends on this >

Re: RFS: ruby-omniauth-remote-user 0.1.2-1

Hi, * Thiago Ribeiro [160307 16:57]: > The following packages are ready to be uploaded > > ruby-omniauth-remote-user(0.1.2-1) There's a problem with the gemspec: | ┌──┐ | │ Checking Rubygems

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-install, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

* Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> [160310 10:26]: > Hi team, > please review and upload these new packages: > * ruby-mixlib-install Done/Uploaded. > * ruby-berkshelf-api-client Has distribution as UNSTABLE in d/changelog. For both, please fix the vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri vcs-git lintian

Re: librarian-puppet

Sebastien, I've added --check-dependencies to librarian-puppet.git, and now this fails because it can't find a matching version of puppet_forge. (Added this because previously we didn't notice the mismatching librarianp version.) Please check if my change is useful and if so, what needs to be

Re: RFS using a permanent etherpad?

Another tool that can help the RFS workflow is PET [1], where we can see which packages are ready for upload. But I like the pad idea :) [1] https://pet.debian.net/pkg-ruby-extras/pet.cgi 2016-03-10 2:20 GMT-03:00 Antonio Terceiro : > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 07:51:08PM