ty is:
Breaks: libruby (<< 1:3.1)
What do you think about this?
Please Cc me on replies, I am not subscribed the list.
Thanks!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuP
a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpDVHuRwzbUA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 8 Sep 2018 11:11:08 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 06, 2018 at 12:12:57AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Proposed strategy
> > =
[...]
> >
> > What do you think? Is the above described strategy reasonable? Or do
> > y
ncoding, if I understand correctly.
This is not what I need.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpy
C3\xB6nd bug\n", #, "#
sec??nd bug\n"]
[#, "234567\n", #, "234567\n"]
[#, "# a package\n", #, "# a package\n"]
[#, "my-package0+\n", #,
"my-package0+\n"]
=
[#, "123456"]
[#, "234567"]
ification).
I hope this helps.
Bye and thanks for pushing in the right direction!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1
eciated!
For the record, I filed bug #799194.
Bye.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgphuaaxrBZhY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:10:52 +0300 Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> On 9/14/15, Francesco Poli <invernom...@paranoici.org> wrote:
>
> > Hence, it seems to me that the trouble is not caused by the original
> > string, but by those translated strings that include non-AS
UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
$ LANGUAGE='it_IT:it' apt-listbugs -v
0.1.17
Hence, it seems to me that the trouble is not caused by the original
string, but by those translated strings that include non-ASCII UTF-8
characters and are somehow sent as non-UTF-8 non-pure-ASCII strings,
whenever LC_CTYPE=C ...
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp06MEiO4Q18.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 00:18:12 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
> Hello all,
> while testing some odd locale configurations with the package
> I maintain (apt-listbugs), I stumbled upon an awkward crash.
> I am seeking the help of some knowledgeable Ruby expert, to understand
&g
ainst
package ruby-gettext or ruby-locale?
Could some Ruby expert shed some light on this issue, please?
Thanks for your time!
P.S.: I am not subscribed to debian-ruby, hence please Cc me on replies.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp3kuvbHg_SI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 11:13:55 +0300 Hleb Valoshka wrote:
On 8/1/15, Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
...
As a consequence, I can think of the following possible strategies to
address this issue:
A) persuade the OpenSSL copyright holders to switch to a sane 3-clause
On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:58:35 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2015 at 04:55:28PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
B) modify libruby to link with a GPL-compatible SSL/TLS implementation
(such as libgnutls or libnss or anything else fit for the purpose),
so that SSL
you think?
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/
There's not a second to spare! To the laboratory!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpuBbKxXP6_3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 02 Mar 2014 23:32:07 +0100 Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
[...]
I am filing this bug report against my own package, since I noticed
something awkward that I am unable to understand.
Hence this is intended as both a reminder of the issue and a call for
help.
[...]
Do anyone have
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014 23:51:32 +0100 Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi Francesco, Lucas, list,
Hello Christian,
* Francesco Poli invernom...@paranoici.org [140105 16:44]:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 17:26:31 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The bug report below is interesting. The user has ruby1.8
document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpgXG01dxzyw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:17:03 -0300 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Adding Francesco back (he asked to be Cc:ed)
Thanks Antonio!
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:44:35PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:36:06PM +0200, Francesco Poli (wintermute) wrote:
Hello
---
ruby-policy.mdw | 25 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ruby-policy.mdw b/ruby-policy.mdw
index 9fb8981..b73fc81 100644
--- a/ruby-policy.mdw
+++ b/ruby-policy.mdw
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Background
There are several “subpolicies” in Debian.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 11:56:46 +0200 Cédric Boutillier wrote:
[...]
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:35:05PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
I am looking at the page [1] that describes the current status of the
Debian Ruby Policy transition.
[...]
[1] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org
/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpWbbJfGPe4V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the good work!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp2pG3Wo6I0y.pgp
Description: PGP
!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpF2tLllS1zX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:40:49 -0600 Bob Proulx wrote:
Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
The most general issue is that apt-listbugs needs to perform the
following steps (when run in apt mode):
* first it reads some input through its STDIN, through a pipe
* when this input ends (EOF
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:38:04 +0100 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Francesco Poli
invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:15:09 +0100 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
[...]
Could you try posting the output of
p Dir[/proc/self/fd/*].map {|x| begin File
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:15:09 +0100 Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
Hi! Thanks for your kind reply!
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Francesco Poli
invernom...@paranoici.org wrote:
[...]
Currently, apt-listbugs does all this by opening /dev/tty, after the
input ends.
Does it do
-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpRum3igHY1Y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpMkWQrbdyAB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:00:06 -0200 Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Francesco Poli escreveu isso aí:
Hi everybody,
I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being
discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration
in Debian:
http://lists.debian.org/debian
to
clarify things up!
Bye and thanks to everyone who is volunteering his/her time to improve
Debian and Ruby in Debian!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli
/driver.rb
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpQaPb6MmGjx.pgp
Description: PGP
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:26:51 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:58:42 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Since Ryan will no longer be involved in apt-listbugs maintenance, I am
still looking for a co-maintainer.
Thanks in advance to anyone who volunteers for this task.
I
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:58:42 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Also, could someone please review the proposed git work-flow and tell
me if it is OK?
However, I still need confirmation that the git work-flow I am planning
to follow
, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Francesco Poli f...@firenze.linux.it wrote:
However, I still need confirmation that the git work-flow I am planning
to follow won't mess everything up.
Could someone please review it (see http://bugs.debian.org/588636#39)?
A few minor issues, but it looks good.
Thanks
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
Now I am short of ideas on how to proceed: I would like to take over
the maintenance of apt-listbugs (possibly with help from someone else,
see below) and get direct push access to its public git repository on
alioth.
As I said
expert I would dream to be!) or on packaging
techniques (I am still learning!).
Any volunteer?
Thanks in advance for your time!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
Need some pdebuild hook scripts?
. Francesco
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010 23:29:28 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote:
Hi everybody,
[...]
I forgot to add that I am not subscribed to debian-mentors or to
debian-ruby: hence, please Cc: me on replies.
Thanks again.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/progs/scripts/pdebuild-hooks.html
Need some pdebuild hook
38 matches
Mail list logo
