Re: Ruby interpreter transition & DebCamp/DebConf plans

Hi Lucas, On 2024-05-14 17:44, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/04/24 at 18:55 -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After some thoughts and talking to Antonio, we decided to skip the version >> 3.2 of the ruby interpreter and move straight to v

Ruby interpreter transition & DebCamp/DebConf plans

, I also want to propose a Ruby BoF as we regularly do. If you have any topic in mind to be discussed let me know. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Plans for Ruby 3.3?

. The Ruby 3.2 transition is ready to be started (it should be starting soon, when we get an ack from the release team) and this is something I'll be doing in Ubuntu anyway, so I think there is no reason to not do it in Debian as well. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Ruby 3.2 transition - Help to fix broken packages

installing ruby-all-dev version 1:3.1+1 from experimental. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Ruby team BoF - DebConf 23

with anything you believe we should discuss during our BoF. I'll be doing the same. [1] apt install gobby, then open the gobby app and connect to gobby.debian.org [2] search for debconf23 -> bof -> ruby-team Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: plans for ruby 3.2 ?

to act on the packages as a team, in a coordinated way. Maybe we should try to do the same again. Any thoughts? -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: rackup and rack3.0

ent-1621834052 [2] https://github.com/sinatra/sinatra/pull/1857 Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Request to join Salsa team

Hi Jeremy, Em 03/07/2023 16:47, Jeremy Bícha escreveu: Hi, I want to upload ruby-cairo to update it for cairo 1.17.8 Could I please get commit rights to the Salsa repo? My Salsa username is jbicha Just invited you to the group. Thanks for working on it. -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Debian Ruby sprint - Paris February 2023?

Hi Cédric, Thanks for organizing the team's sprint again, really appreciated! I'd be happy to stay in the same AppartHotel as the last time (it was really good in my opinion), but if you (and others) have better options I am also all in :) Hope to see you all soon! Cheers! -- Lucas

Re: Building with gem2deb points to a removed package

removed the mention to license-reconcile. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: [RFS] fixed bug #1019677 in ruby-webpacker

] the webpacker gem during new-app test. So possibly this shouldn't break rails autopkgtest ? Thanks for checking this out. I just sponsored the upload. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: [RFS] fixed bug #1019677 in ruby-webpacker

of the version in experimental, do you know if we are ready to upload version 5.4.3 to unstable? Is rails ready for that? I want to make sure you did check all that before sponsoring your upload. -- Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#1023761: ITP: ruby-rack-session -- Session management implementation for Rack

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Kanashiro X-Debbugs-Cc:debian-ruby@lists.debian.org * Package name: ruby-rack-session Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Leah Neukirchen, Samuel G. D. Williams, Scytrin dai Kinthra

Bug#1023708: ITP: ruby-rackup -- A general server command for Rack applications

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lucas Kanashiro X-Debbugs-Cc:debian-ruby@lists.debian.org * Package name: ruby-rackup Version : 0.2.2 Upstream Author :Leah Neukirchen <https://leahneukirchen.org> , Samuel G. D. Williams <https://www.code

Re: RFS: ruby-rack-oauth2 1.21.2

ug, it was already merged and I believe it is included in the latest release. -- Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#1018910: ROM: ruby-rack-mount; abandoned upstream

covered but newer versions of ruby-rack. There is no reverse dependency. [1] https://github.com/jm/rack-mount TIA! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFC: dropping Ruby-Versions fields

s if we just drop it? I have not seen any package making use of that, always set to the default. Moreover, IIRC there is some lintian warning about those fields which sometimes confuses new contributors. In short, +1 to removing that field. -- Lucas Kanashiro

[DC22] Ruby team BoF notes

pointing to parent path /usr/share/javascript/XXX of /<>/debian/ruby-jquery-atwho-rails/usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/XXX is not allowed == -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: DebConf 22 - BoF agenda

Hi, The link to the etherpad is available in the talk description but here is the link: https://pad.dc22.debconf.org/p/52-ruby-team-bof Feel free to edit it! -- Lucas Kanashiro

DebConf 22 - BoF agenda

to the agenda as well. See you all soon! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: new restriction in rubygems: installing symlink pointing to parent path not allowed - causes ruby-handlebars-assets to ftbfs

solution, we will have to rebuild ruby package whenever the js package > changes. Can we modify rubygems to allow this link? I believe this behavior was introduced by this rubygems upstream commit: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/commit/555692b8deb8f6b27ce29b843dc59384d508e8c1 One thing we

Re: Ruby team BoF at DebConf 22

Hi, I submitted our BoF with the same description from last year. I am looking forward to see you there! Cheers! On 11/04/2022 12:22, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Hi everyone, Should we submit our regular BoF to DebConf this year? Are people planning to attend in-person? Are there people willing

Ruby team BoF at DebConf 22

Hi everyone, Should we submit our regular BoF to DebConf this year? Are people planning to attend in-person? Are there people willing to attend remotely? Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Ruby 3.0 is the default in experimental

Hi, FYI I just uploaded ruby-defaults/1:3.0~exp1 to experimental, and now ruby3.0 is the default and ruby2.7 support was removed. In unstable no change was made. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

[RFH] Fix FTBFSes to kick off the ruby3.0 transition

list of bugs we are tracking for the transition here [2]. TIA! [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/ruby3.0-add.html [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-ruby@lists.debian.org -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Ruby 3.0 enabled in unstable

Hi, Em 01/10/2021 16:36, Lucas Kanashiro escreveu: Hi everyone, This is just a FYI that ruby3.0 is now enabled by ruby-defaults in unstable. From now on, building packages in unstable will trigger tests and build extensions for both, 2.7 and 3.0. Due to a build failure in mipsel

Ruby 3.0 enabled in unstable

to all of you the status, so we can start to file bugs against packages failing to build with ruby3.0. Have a great weekend! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Question - why does ruby2.7 recommend a font?

was surprising. I wondered if it was deliberate or a mistake? This is not a mistake. The package even creates symlinks from those dependencies to make them correctly work with rdoc. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFC: Revoke membership for janitor bot

is the expected. I'd be OK with merge requests coming from janitor. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Mass rebuild against ruby 3.0

Em 14/01/2021 14:19, Antonio Terceiro escreveu: On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 09:45:39AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Hi team, I have done a mass rebuild of all ruby reverse dependencies against ruby 3.0, and here are the results: https://people.debian.org/~kanashiro/ruby3.0/builds/ Please

Mass rebuild against ruby 3.0

the freezing process starting we can take advantage of experimental to stage fixes. If you find any issue or have any question or concern feel free to reach out. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#973444: binNMU: ruby packages affected by #972702

vendor_ruby/ | grep '\.so$' | wc -l 164 I'd like to know the better course of action to accomplish this. Thanks in advance! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: ruby-voight-kampff repo missing?

ploads have been done by: > 1.1.3-3 to unstable: Lucas Kanashiro > 1.1.3-2 to unstable: 李健秋 Andrew Lee (Debian Developer) > 1.1.3-1 to experimental: 李健秋 Andrew Lee (Debian Developer) > > Lucas, Andrew, have you a local copy of the repo that you could push > back to salsa? Unfortu

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8< > > > 6. Possible sprints in 2020/21 > == > > > -> A sprint would definitely be a good idea. > -> Perhaps a dedicated, online sprint in 2020. > -> In-person sprints in 2021, when the world becomes a better place. >* Anybody is planning to host? > -> georg mentioned that he could do so in Germany. Is it still on? > -> ... > > -> TODO: add more.. > > > 8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8< > > > 7. Any other business? > == > > -> Make the community more "engaging".. >* TODO: add more.. > -> Do we want to continue the monthly meets? >* or make it bi-monthly? > > -> TODO: add more.. > > > 8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8< > > > == > > > Best, > Utkarsh > -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

opose the same time as that of our usual meeting? > That is, 1630 UTC. Is everyone OK with it? > Should we do a quick poll instead? The same time works for me. -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Ruby 2.7 blog post

Hi, On 10/05/2020 08:26, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Freitag, den 08.05.2020, 15:47 -0300 schrieb Lucas Kanashiro: >> In our today team meeting [1] we decided to write a blog post about Ruby >> 2.7 since its transition is now done \o/. It will be good not just to >> announce

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

st IRC :). However, we need to coordinate this well mostly because of the timezone, our team is well spread and we'd need to find a suitable time for everyone. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Ruby 2.7 blog post

://pad.riseup.net/p/ruby2.7-in-debian-keep Cheers! P.S.: I am trying to not spam you all :P -- Lucas Kanashiro

Policy to update packages with API breaking changes

://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ruby/2020/debian-ruby.2020-05-08-16.53.log.html [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Updating_packages_with_API_breaking_changes Cheers! P.S.: I hope you all are home and safe! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#959203: RM: ruby2.5

unstable? Thanks in advance! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Should libruby2.x have Provides: ruby-foo (= x.y.z) for the gems it ships?

is indeed a good idea, I already faced a similar issue in the past. > I think this is a good idea. > > Are you willing to do it? If yes just do it, or if not, please open a > bug report so it doesn't get lost. I am already adding some changes in src:ruby2.7 to better support riscv, I can add the Provides suggested by Daniel. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#956071: RM: sup-mail and ruby-session

projects are not active for years [1][2]. They are leaf packages so their removals are not a problem. [1] https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup [2] https://github.com/ahoward/session/ Thanks in advance! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Bug#955048: RM: ruby-em-hiredis/0.3.1-1

-hiredis Thanks in advance! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

are here to support our users but there are some trade-offs that need to be taken in account. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFC: RM requests for ruby-upr, ruby-multipart-parser, and ruby-haml-contrib

Hey Daniel, Thanks for identifying those packages but as we discussed today in our IRC meeting we will not remove packages that are not actually broken, even if they are old and not maintained upstream. So please, let's not remove those packages. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Candidates for removal due to Ruby 2.7 transition

please reply to this email and I'll not request a removal. I'll wait for some feedback until next week. [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/sup-mail [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ruby-session Have a wonderful weekend! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: Ruby Team BoF in DC20?

o enrich our discussions. For instance, since DC19 I've interacted with Andreas Tille to get us some data like this [1] for our team. [1] http://blends.debian.net/liststats/commitstat_ruby-team.png Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

[Help] Ruby 2.7 - FTBFS and bug reports

will help us to keep track of what we need to fix and also for potential package removals (if no one cares about them). Thanks in advance! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Ruby team sprint -- accomodation etc.

JFTR, I booked a room by myself at Citadines Austerlitz Paris as suggested by Cédric. I'll share this room with Utkarsh. See you all soon! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Ruby 2.7 transition

Please, let me know if you have any question! P.S.: Feel free to edit the wiki page as you see it fits better. Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: reducing volument of KGB notifications on IRC

Hi Em 17 de agosto de 2019 13:02:44 BRT, Antonio Terceiro escreveu: >On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 01:05:52PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 16/08/19 7:09 pm, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > To reduce the volume of KGB notifications on IRC, I intend to run >the >> >

Re: Joining team-ruby

Hi, On 06/08/2019 16:30, Stewart Ferguson wrote: > Hi Ruby, > > Can an admin please add me to the ruby-team salsa/gitlab group? Specifically, > I'd like to help with the redmine package, getting it back into bullseye and > buster-backports. As one of the redmine's uploaders I really appreciate

Re: Ruby team sprint(s)

being central for all); > if anyone has a problem with that, let us know? > Perhaps we should start planning it already; need approval(s) after the > date and venue is finalized. Let's see whether Cedric's proposal is still valid :) Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Ruby team sprint in DebCamp?

DebCamp, but you need at least some goals to hold a sprint. Try to define some goals and publish them here to see if people are interested on them. In the worst case you can do your own Ruby sprint with yourself :-) Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: DebConf19 Ruby Team BoF

Hey, On 5/12/19 9:01 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:46:38AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: >> * Who will come to Brazil to attend DebConf? Would you like to >> participate in this BoF? > I will be around, and most likely will participate in the BoF. Si

Re: DebConf19 Ruby Team BoF

Hi, On 5/10/19 12:19 PM, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey,  > > On Fri 10 May, 2019, 8:17 PM Lucas Kanashiro, <mailto:kanash...@debian.org>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I was thinking if the team would like to hold a BoF at DebConf this > year. A good info

DebConf19 Ruby Team BoF

to submit it until May 12th (a.k.a. this Sunday). Looking forward for your replies :) Cheers! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Rails 5 transition plan - help needed

unstable   | source, all >> >> Emilio > > Hi Emilio, > > Thanks for the help. It was a long transition, happy to see it in > buster. Thanks also to everyone in the ruby team who contributed. > > Cheers > Praveen > > > -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Rails 5 transition plan - help needed

oesn't depend on ruby-protected-attributes anymore. Cheers. -- -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-jekyll-gist

s in the next time. It's already uploaded. Thank you for the contribution! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-gitlab

ound at > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-gitlab >   > Please consider to review and upload it. > > c.f. https://git.fosscommunity.in/debian-ruby/TaskTracker/issues/110 > Best, > Utkarsh -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-octokit

ound at > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-octokit >   > Please consider to review and upload it. > > > Thanks, > Utkarsh Gupta -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-declarative

alsa repo which may be found at > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-declarative >   > Please consider to review and upload it. > It is listed in the todo list for the ruby-team. > Thanks, > Utkarsh Gupta -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: RFS: ruby-oauth 0.5.4-1

e is IMHO ready to be uploaded: > > ruby-oauth 0.5.4-1 > > Could you please sponsor it? > > Thanks! -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: A Debian Ruby Sprint in Europe (France?) during the fourth semester 2018?

ested on it) we can add those extra points (CI, reproducible builds and so on so forth). What do you think? Cheers, Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Ready for review and looking for sponsor for ruby-websocket package

Uploaded a while ago, I forgot to notify the list. Thanks for your contribution. Regards. On 05/23/2018 01:18 PM, Manas Kashyap wrote: > I have made the corrections , can anyone now , review it and upload it  > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:37 PM, Lucas Kanashiro <kanash..

Re: A Debian Ruby Sprint in Europe (France?) during the fourth semester 2018?

> What do you think? Did you already think about the agenda of this sprint? Cheers, Lucas Kanashiro. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Ready for review and looking for sponsor for ruby-websocket package

ailable under > salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-websocket > <http://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-websocket> , please review it > , and upload it  > > On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 11:35 PM, Lucas Kanashiro > <kanash...@debian.org <mailto:kanash...@debian.org>> wrote: > >

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-config

Hi, Uploaded. Just a small comment for the next upload, try to use https:// in Format field in debian/copyright. Cheers. On 05/12/2018 08:46 AM, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team! > > I've prepared a new version of ruby-mixlib-config, please upload it. > > Thanks in advance. > signature.asc

Re: Ready for review and looking for sponsor for ruby-websocket package

n-starts-with-leading-spaces Fix those things and we can upload your package :) Regards, Lucas Kanashiro. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Request for sponsorship: ruby-crb-blast

Hi, On 04/13/2018 10:36 AM, Michael Crusoe wrote: > > 2018-04-13 16:00 GMT+03:00 Chris Hofstaedtler >: > > * Michael Crusoe > [180413 14:30]: > > Due to a bug the binary package

Re: RFS: ruby-tilt new version

Thanks Joseph! Uploaded. On 04/10/2018 10:46 PM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Thanks a lot for your review > > >> After had a look in ruby-tilt a saw that upstream changed the years of >> the copyright, you should update it in debian/copyright file. > Updated in the repo. > >> Another

Re: RFS: ruby-tilt new version

Hi Joseph, On 04/10/2018 02:05 AM, Joseph Herlant wrote: > Hi guys, > > I package ruby-tilt's latest version (mostly to fix some annoying > warning I had on other applications that have been removed upstream > about a year ago). > Also fixed a few lintian complains and enabled the autopkgtests >

Re: Request to join ruby-team

Someone already accepted your request. When you have a ready to upload package you can mail us here. Welcome ;) Cheers. On 03/27/2018 06:37 AM, James Valleroy wrote: > Hello, > > I am working on packaging ruby-cucumber-expressions (ITP: #882429). > > My initial packaging is available here: >

Re: RFS: ruby-neovim 0.7.1-1

Uploaded. Thanks! On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 20:11 -0400, Jason Pleau wrote: > Hi. > > I have prepared in git (https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-neovi > m) the latest upstream release for ruby-neovim. It would be nice if > someone could review the changes and upload to unstable. > > You will

Re: RFS: ruby-pathutil

Uploaded. Cheers. On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 11:17 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote: > Dear folks, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded. > Could you please sponsor them? > > * Package name: ruby-pathutil > Version : 2.6.0 > Upstream Author : Jordon Bedwell > * URL or

Re: RFS: ruby-gitlab 4.2.0

Uploaded, thanks for the improvements in the packaging Sophie :) Cheers. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: ruby-gitlab 4.2.0

could say something about it better than me. Cheers. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: ruby-gitlab 4.2.0

t work in a installed version. So, I think that you could create a patch to fix it, could you do it please? Cheers. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (1.67.0-1)

Hi, I uploaded it. I just added the Testsuite field in debian/control to mark it as autopkgtest-able. Thanks for your work! Cheers. On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 02:56 +0200, Tomasz Nitecki wrote: > Hey, > > On 05/09/17 18:27, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > > I took a look on this package

Re: RFS: ruby-aws-sdk (1.67.0-1)

fications seems ok, but I do not know why did you update the years of upstream copyright if they did not do it. Could you clarify it to me? Has some especific reason? Cheers. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: help wanted with the Ruby toolchain

volunteers to > help, we can think of ways of improving knowledge transfer and the > available documentation, such as IRC/videoconf sessions, sprints, etc. > > If you are willing to come on board, please say so. You do not need to > be a DD or DM to help. > > References > -- > > [TRANSITION-BUSTER] > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20170609012532.mh5kkn452izcz...@debian.org > [TRANSITION-DOC] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTransitions > > Thanks, -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: scaling down my participation in the Ruby team

Thanks for all your work Terceiro! :-) On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 18:42 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to reduce the number of things I am involved in Debian in > order to be able to be more effective on the remaining. I realized > that > the Ruby team is functional enough that

Re: RFS: ruby-buff-config

It is uploaded. But be aware that berkshelf and berkshelf-api are not building because of this update. Maybe you just need to relax the version, I did not worry because you are the Uploader of both :) Cheers. On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 00:34 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 8/14/17, Lucas Kanash

Re: RFS: ruby-buff-config

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, On Thu, 2017-08-10 at 16:03 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team, > > please upload a new version of ruby-buff-config. > Could you fix these things below? * ruby-buff-config source: quilt-patch-missing-description remove-spork *

Re: RFS: ruby-varia-model

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Uploaded. Waiting for your next packages. Thanks for your work! On Thu, 2017-07-27 at 23:21 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team! > > Please upload new version of ruby-varia-model. It may break > ruby-ridley and some other berkshelf related

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-archive with CVE fix

Hi Hleb, On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 17:49 +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team! > > I've prepared a fix for CVE-2017-126 (#868572) for Stretch, > please > review and upload (branch 'stretch'). > Thanks for your work! I'll review it, test it and coordinate the DSA with security team. I just

Re: ruby-integration_0.1.4-1

he build (enabling it in debian/rules) and use debhelper 10 instead of 9. Cheers. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: ruby-bindata_2.3.5-1

2017-01-27 12:57 GMT-02:00 Christian Hofstaedtler <z...@debian.org>: > * Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro.dua...@gmail.com> [170127 13:15]: > > I've just reviewed your work and you forgot to update years of upstream > > copyright. Could you check it? > > When it'

Re: ruby-bindata_2.3.5-1

ackage is ready to be uploaded. > > Could you please sponsor it? > > Thanks, > Lucas Moura > -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: RFS: itamae_1.9.10-1

t; > [0] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship > > -- > Regards, > Scott. > -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: ruby-stud_0.0.22-1

erefore, I don't know if it is a good ideia to make > this change. > > Best regards, > Lucas Moura > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Lucas Kanashiro < > kanashiro.dua...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think that exists some runtime dependencies declared in

Re: Please test reverse dependencies before uploading new versions (ruby-grape-entity broke gitlab)

//ci.debian.net/data/packages/unstable/amd64/g/ > gitlab/latest-autopkgtest/log.gz > [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2016/07/msg00091.html > > -- Lucas Kanashiro

Re: ruby-stud_0.0.22-1

Hi, I think that exists some runtime dependencies declared in debian/control file that have not been used, could you check them? And I think that you should start to import the upstream source code from github, where you can get and run tests (upstream do not ship with test files). Maybe you can

Re: RFS: reel, fix for the serious bug #841704

Done! Em 29 de nov de 2016 12:53, "Hleb Valoshka" <375...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Hi team, > > please upload reel 0.6.1-2, it fixes #841704 (as > ruby-certificate-authority is packaged then use it and don't provide > pregenerated certificates). > > Thanks in advance. > >

Re: RFS: berkshelf-api

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 03:35:14PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > Hi team! > > Thanks to PET I've found that our berkshelf-api package is outdated, > please upload the version from git. > > Thanks in advance. > Uploaded. -- Lucas Kanashiro signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Relax another dependency in Gitlab package

On 06/28/2016 11:19 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Tuesday 28 June 2016 07:45 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: >> Any news? > It seems fine from the changelog. > > Would it be okay if we wait for gitlab 8.9 (its already in experimental > and once we upload diaspora 0.5.9.1 to

Re: Relax another dependency in Gitlab package

Any news? On 06/23/2016 10:49 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On Wednesday 22 June 2016 07:15 PM, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I intend to update ruby-omniauth-google-oauth2 package with the latest >> upstream release (version 0.4.1), and the only reverse dependency

Re: Sponsor mkalias package

Uploaded. On 06/23/2016 03:00 PM, Luciano Prestes wrote: > Hi, I packing mkalias, please, someone could review and sponsor it? > > Att, > Luciano Prestes -- Lucas Kanashiro 8ED6 C3F8 BAC9 DB7F C130 A870 F823 A272 9883 C97C signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

  1   2   >