Re: RFS: ruby-jsonb-accessor 1.3.10-1

Hi Ravi, On 10/18/23 12:30 PM, Ravi Dwivedi wrote: Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). It is required for packaging gitlab (see

Re: [RFS] ruby-net-protocol 0.1.3-1

Hi Ravish, On 9/16/23 11:17, Ravish BC wrote: Hi, The following package are ready to be uploaded and it is required for gitlab 16.1.0 Could you please sponsor the following new package? ruby-net-protocol 0.1.3-1 (https://salsa.debian.org/ravish0007/ruby-net-protocol/) This library is

[RFS] -- ruby-spamcheck

Hello Team, I've prepared a fix for #1039950[1] which is required for gitlab 15.11.6. Requesting someone to review & sponsor the same. [1] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1039950 [2] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-spamcheck Regards, -- Mohammed Bilal 2D65 BC1E

Re: oj.h not found

Hello Vinay, On 12/24/22 00:09, Vinay wrote: adding the header file in /usr/include solved the #include "oj.h" problem. execute_before_dh_auto_install:     for r in $$(ruby -rruby_debian_dev -e 'puts RubyDebianDev::SUPPORTED_RUBY_VERSIONS.values'); do \     dh_install

Re: [RFS] -- ruby-fog-local,ruby-fogbugz

Hello Vinay, On 12/22/22 23:54, Vinay wrote: On 22/12/22 23:09, Vinay wrote:         Requesting access to push to this repositories. I've modified the permissions for you for these 3 packages in salsa. You should be able to push now. Cheers -- Mohammed Bilal 2D65 BC1E B966 5A6E 97F9

Re: faraday-multipart build error

Hi Vinay, On 12/15/22 06:24, Vinay wrote: ruby-faraday latest upstream is uploaded to experimental, how to mention an experimental package in d/control Build-Depends ? Or should use sbuild with --extra-repository of experimental ? Yes, you should enable experimental repo during sbuild using

Re: [RFS] fixed bug #1019677 in ruby-webpacker

Hi Lucas, On 12/6/22 04:18, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: Thanks for the patch, it does fix the build failure. However, you applied your changes on top of the version in experimental, do you know if we are ready to upload version 5.4.3 to unstable? Is rails ready for that? I want to make sure you

[RFS] fixed bug #1019677 in ruby-webpacker

Hello team, I've pushed a fix for #1019677 in ruby-webpacker[1] which blocks the migration of ruby3.1. Can someone sponsor an upload please :) [1] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-webpacker Thanks -- Mohammed Bilal 2D65 BC1E B966 5A6E 97F9 730A B3F5 9452 8521 9E1F

RFS -- ruby-bootsnap 1.12.0

Hello team, I've updated ruby-bootsnap to 1.12.0. The package is lintian clean and was successfully built using sbuild. Requesting someone to review and sponsor my changes or you may consider granting me DM access for the same. Thanks --

RFS: ruby-et-orbi 1.2.6

, Mohd Bilal

RFS: packages requiring reupload

Hi, The following packages require a source only upload for migration to testing. Requesting someone to sponsor these packages [1]ruby-hkdf 1.0.0 [2]ruby-slowpoke 0.3.2 [3]ruby-scarf 0.2.6 [4]ruby-motion-require 0.2.0 [5]ruby-humanize 2.5.1 [6]ruby-file-validators 3.0.0

Re: ruby-gaffe_1.2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

to this email if you don't understand why > your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our > concerns. Thanks , Mohd Bilal

Re: RFS: ruby-motion-require 0.2.0 , ruby-file-validators 3.0.0

September 30, 2021 7:55 PM, "Pirate Praveen" wrote: > On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 29 2021 at 07:01:11 വൈകു > +0000 +, Mohd Bilal wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the >> points listed on >

Re: RFS: ruby-gaffe 1.2.0

September 30, 2021 2:36 AM, "Pirate Praveen" wrote: > On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 04:28:59 വൈകു > +0000 +, Mohd Bilal wrote: > >> Hi, >> I've packed ruby-gaffe[1] and is ready to be uploaded (I also >> verified the >> points listed on >

RFS: ruby-motion-require 0.2.0 , ruby-file-validators 3.0.0

] [1] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-motion-require [2] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-file-validators [3] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/pupilfirst Also thanks to all the wonderful people on #debian-ruby for helping me package this :) -Mohd Bilal

RFS: ruby-gaffe 1.2.0

Hi, I've packed ruby-gaffe[1] and is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). This package is a dependency of pupilfirst[2] Could you please sponsor this? [1] -

RFS: ruby-hkdf 1.0.0 , ruby-slowpoke 0.3.2 , ruby-scarf 0.2.6

Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could you please sponsor them? [1]ruby-hkdf 1.0.0 [2]ruby-slowpoke 0.3.2 [3]ruby-scarf 0.2.6 These are dependencies of

Request to join ruby-team

. Salsa username : mdb571 [1] - https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/pupilfirst/ Thanks, Mohd Bilal

RFS: ruby-humanize 2.5.1

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem `humanize`.It is lintian clean. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/mdb571/ruby-humanize This package is a dependency of pupilfirst (https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/pupilfirst/) .

RFS: ruby-attribute-normalizer 1.2.0

Hi, I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem attribute_normalizer.It is lintian clean. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at https://salsa.debian.org/mdb571/ruby-attribute-normalizer This package is a dependency of pupilfirst