Re: ruby-gettext-setup: FTBFS [Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve]

On 4/4/18, Georg Faerber wrote: >> I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually >> use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-gettext. So its test >> failures caused by something else, not the new gettext version. > I would be interested in how you

ruby-gettext-setup: FTBFS [Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve]

Hi Hleb, all, On 18-03-21 23:29:33, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > > ci.debian.net. > > I've checked

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/22/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I would rather see this minimal patch to disallow gecode engine in > ruby-solve, and a Breaks: berkshelf (<= current version) > instead of the Conflicts: ruby-dep-selector. > I think it would ease a lot upgrade path if we just prevent

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 18-03-21 23:34:50, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:29:33PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:29:33PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > > ci.debian.net. > I've checked

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > ci.debian.net. I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually use anything from gettext

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

ruby-kgio uploaded. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

hi! I uploaded ruby-tzinfo. I just added the Testsuite: autopkgtest-pkg-ruby in the control file. Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on ci.debian.net. For ruby-solve, I couldn't run the tests for berkshelf with

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/20/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Could you please update the Standards-Version field and the debhelper > compatibility for these packages, as well as switching the debian/watch > to https? Done. I usually don't change them if lintian doesn't say to. > Can you clarify

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

Hi Hleb, On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 04:17:19PM +0300, Hleb Valoshka wrote: > * just a new minor version + vcs-* updated: >- ruby-tzinfo >- ruby-gettext >- ruby-kgio > * a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken > ruby-dep-selector installation >- ruby-solve Could

RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

Hi team! I've prepared new version for the following packages: * just a new minor version + vcs-* updated: - ruby-tzinfo - ruby-gettext - ruby-kgio * a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken ruby-dep-selector installation - ruby-solve Please review and upload