2014-04-16 12:23 GMT+05:30, Pirate Praveen prav...@gmail.com:
2013-06-09 9:11 GMT+05:30, Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
Thanks Antonio!
acts-as-taggable-on is still failing tests.
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-acts-as-taggable-on.git
Can some one look into it?
I
Thanks Antonio!
On Jun 9, 2013 6:43 AM, Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Praveen,
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 08:09:10PM +0530, Praveen A wrote: 2013/6/4
Antonio Terceiro terceiro@de...
It was almost OK - the only issue was that you merged pristine-tar into
master, so dpkg-source was
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:21:18AM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
2013/6/3 Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
Ah! I just uploaded 0.6.1! Just pull, before you update.
There is conflict, I will just remove my upload instead.
Before my dcut commands could remove it, it was already accepted. I
merged
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Next thing on my list is rack, which also needs a new version.
Do you have an opinion on rack as well?
Currently, actionpack 3.2 wants ~ 1.4.5, but
actionpack 4.0
2013/6/4 Antonio Terceiro terce...@debian.org:
You have to merge pristine and upstream as well before pushing.
Hi Antonio,
Please check if the repo is in a good state. I have manually merged
all branches. If you think its okay, you can upload the new version.
If not I can try to replay my
2013/6/4 Praveen A prav...@debian.org:
Sam,
You can just substitute the package name in the git clone url to get other
packages. So change ruby-shoulda-matchers to ruby-i18n to checkout i18n
debian package repo. Follow the same process for building it.
Praveen
Hi Sam,
Anyway these are
2013/6/4 Praveen A prav...@debian.org:
And with the changes Christian made, I was able to run rails new
testapp, successfully. Also I had to add rubygems-integration to build
deps, so it could find rails. I also added some more build deps so it
has all the libraries it need to run tests (try
On 06/04/2013 11:07 AM, Praveen A wrote:
2013/6/4 Praveen A prav...@debian.org:
Sam,
You can just substitute the package name in the git clone url to get other
packages. So change ruby-shoulda-matchers to ruby-i18n to checkout i18n
debian package repo. Follow the same process for building it.
On 06/04/2013 12:19 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
4) I haven't yet figured out how to run this. I keep getting errors
about local changes. I'm now off to learn quilt.
http://wiki.debian.org/Diaspora/Packaging/quilt
I can now run with this patch, and get further. Next up: a series of
error messages
On 06/04/2013 12:46 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 06/04/2013 12:19 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
4) I haven't yet figured out how to run this. I keep getting errors
about local changes. I'm now off to learn quilt.
http://wiki.debian.org/Diaspora/Packaging/quilt
I can now run with this patch, and get
On 06/04/2013 09:26 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:38:29AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Next thing on my list is rack, which also needs a new version.
Do you have an opinion on rack as well?
Currently, actionpack 3.2
2013/6/5 Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net:
sudo aptitude update
sudo aptitude safe-upgrade
I used 'sudo apt-get update; sudo apt-get dist-upgrade' instead. Is that a
problem?
that should be fine.
What version of rack do you see? Rails 3.2 doesn't appear to like rack 1.5.
$ gem list
Only ruby 1.8 was not finding i18n, with ruby 1.9, it was showing only
missing rails. Did you notice that?
On Jun 3, 2013 4:04 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On 06/03/2013 02:12 AM, Praveen A wrote: 2013/6/3 Praveen A
prav...@gmail.com: Hi Sam, ...
Getting further...
Resolving
2013/6/3 Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
Latest version of i18n is 0.6.4. Should we update it to latest
version? For now I'll update to 0.6.1 and if it is better to update to
latest, I will
On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Praveen, Sam,
* Praveen A prav...@gmail.com [130603 15:45]:
2013/6/3 Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
I will update it as I would like you to spend time on things I can't
solve myself - rails specific stuff :)
Latest version of i18n is
2013/6/3 Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
2013/6/3 Christian Hofstaedtler christ...@hofstaedtler.name:
Praveen, Sam,
activesupport right now requires '= 0.6.1' for i18n. I'm working on
updating i18n to 0.6.4, and adding a patch to activesupport to say
'= 0.6.1'.
Christian,
Ah! I just uploaded
On 06/03/2013 10:14 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Sam,
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130603 16:05]:
On 06/03/2013 09:49 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Praveen, Sam,
* Praveen A prav...@gmail.com [130603 15:45]:
2013/6/3 Praveen A prav...@gmail.com:
I will update it as I would
Hey everybody,
The team repository has updated packages for:
ruby-mail
ruby-journey
ruby-rack
ruby-i18n
It also carries patches to:
ruby-actionpack-3.2
ruby-activesupport-3.2
ruby-activemodel-3.2
If you could give these a try (by building from the repo), that'd be
great.
FWIW:
On 06/03/2013 12:17 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hey everybody,
The team repository has updated packages for:
ruby-mail
ruby-journey
ruby-rack
ruby-i18n
It also carries patches to:
ruby-actionpack-3.2
ruby-activesupport-3.2
ruby-activemodel-3.2
If you could give
On 05/28/2013 02:27 PM, Praveen A wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting stuck trying to build many rails based gems,
shoulda-matchers - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709431
acts_as_api, nested_form etc I think they are too much dependent on
bundler and it is too complex to untangle
Hi,
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 13:43]:
On 05/28/2013 02:27 PM, Praveen A wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting stuck trying to build many rails based gems,
shoulda-matchers - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709431
[..]
Offlist, Praveen pointed me to
On 06/02/2013 08:34 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi,
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 13:43]:
On 05/28/2013 02:27 PM, Praveen A wrote:
Hi,
I have been getting stuck trying to build many rails based gems,
shoulda-matchers - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709431
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 16:34]:
On 06/02/2013 08:34 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
[..]
Therefore, the right place to focus is on getting a version of
bundler which play's nice with Debian?
I am not sure what you mean with that. How does the existing
bundler package
On 06/02/2013 11:16 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 16:34]:
On 06/02/2013 08:34 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
[..]
Therefore, the right place to focus is on getting a version of
bundler which play's nice with Debian?
I am not sure what you
2013/6/2 Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net:
On 06/02/2013 11:16 AM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
This does not include actually installing *rails*.
This is a problem of broken build-dependencies in ruby-shoulda-matchers
(which needs to add ruby-rails-3.2).
I'm getting conflicting input
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 18:31]:
On 06/02/2013 11:55 AM, Praveen A wrote:
We should not be using bundler or rubygems at all. So create a quilt
patch and comment out all usage of bundler and rubygems like require
'rubygems', require 'bundler/setup', Bundler.require etc.
On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 18:31]:
From what I can see in the shoulda-matchers tests, the test
application has a Gemfile.lock, which tries to pull in a version of
i18n that is not in the Debian archive.
For your tests to
Sam,
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 19:00]:
On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
In fact, one doesn't even need shoulda-matchers at all to reproduce
this error. The following command also suffices:
$ rails new foobar.
Well - this does work for me.
What exact
On 06/02/2013 03:26 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 06/02/2013 01:04 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
Sam,
* Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net [130602 19:00]:
On 06/02/2013 12:46 PM, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
In fact, one doesn't even need shoulda-matchers at all to reproduce
this error. The
Hi,
I have been getting stuck trying to build many rails based gems,
shoulda-matchers - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=709431
acts_as_api, nested_form etc I think they are too much dependent on
bundler and it is too complex to untangle the bundler dependency.
Basically, it is
30 matches
Mail list logo
