Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On 4/25/16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> 1) upstream is not merged to master > > Intentional. See gbp.conf. Okay, but it's not a layout used by ruby-pkg-extras team afaik. >> 2) as ghi is an application not a library I consider to rename the >> package to just ghi > > Sorry, I

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On Monday, 25 April 2016 4:37:56 PM AEST Hleb Valoshka wrote: > If ghi is the only consumer of ruby-ghi then I don't see any reason to > introduce a new package. So I suggest to merge. Thank you, I'll consider merging. It is true that for now there are no packages depending on "ruby-ghi". But

ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

Dear Team, I'm working on packaging new "ghi" package [1] (CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker). Since I'm not very experienced in packaging Ruby apps may I ask for quick review of my work please? Package repository can be found here:

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On 4/25/16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Since I'm not very experienced in packaging Ruby apps may I ask for quick > review of my work please? Package repository can be found here: > >https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-ghi.git 1) upstream is not merged to

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

Thank you for your feedback, Hleb. On Monday, 25 April 2016 2:19:47 PM AEST Hleb Valoshka wrote: > 1) upstream is not merged to master Intentional. See gbp.conf. > 2) as ghi is an application not a library I consider to rename the > package to just ghi Sorry, I don't quite follow you... There