On 31 October 2021 3:42:11 am IST, Mohd Bilal wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The following packages require a source only upload for migration to testing.
>Requesting someone to sponsor these packages
>
>[1]ruby-hkdf 1.0.0
>[2]ruby-slowpoke 0.3.2
>[3]ruby-scarf 0.2.6
>[4]ruby-motion-require 0.2.0
On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 27 2021 at 11:51:04 രാവിലെ +0530
+0530, Vivek K J wrote:
On 26 October 2021 2:56:41 am IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On വ്യാ, സെപ്റ്റം 30 2021 at 08:09:01
വൈകു +0530 +0530, Vivek K J wrote:
Hi Team,
I've packed ruby-glob which is a dependency of pupilfirst
On ചൊ, ഒക്ടോ 26 2021 at 03:43:53 വൈകു +
+, Mohd Bilal wrote:
October 5, 2021 11:30 PM, "Thorsten Alteholz"
wrote:
Hi,
according to README.md the mushroom cloud logo is based on another
logo licensed under a
CC-license.
Please mention this in your debian/copyright.
The
On വ്യാ, സെപ്റ്റം 30 2021 at 08:09:01
വൈകു +0530 +0530, Vivek K J wrote:
Hi Team,
I've packed ruby-glob which is a dependency of pupilfirst. The
package is available at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-glob. Requesting for
Sponsorship.
Hi Vivek,
Please make sure it
On വ്യാ, ഒക്ടോ 7 2021 at 05:24:46 വൈകു +0530
+0530, Vivek K J wrote:
On 06/10/21 11:17 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 30/9/21 7:43 PM, Vivek K J wrote:
Hi Team,
I've been packed ruby-activerecord-precounter gem for
Debian. It
is a dependency of pupilfirst.. The packed gem
On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2021 at 08:41:58 വൈകു +0530 +0530,
Pirate Praveen wrote:
On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2021 at 07:53:10 വൈകു +0530
+0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 8 October 2021 7:11:38 am IST, Ayoyimika Ajibade
wrote:
Hello
While trying to setup meta script to enable further package
On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2021 at 07:53:10 വൈകു +0530 +0530,
Pirate Praveen wrote:
On 8 October 2021 7:11:38 am IST, Ayoyimika Ajibade
wrote:
Hello
While trying to setup meta script to enable further package a
Javascript
module, as i run ./setup i get this error with starting up LXC
container
On 8 October 2021 7:11:38 am IST, Ayoyimika Ajibade
wrote:
>Hello
>
>While trying to setup meta script to enable further package a Javascript
>module, as i run ./setup i get this error with starting up LXC container
>https://paste.debian.net/1214649/ and when i try to run in foreground
On 30/9/21 7:43 PM, Vivek K J wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I've been packed ruby-activerecord-precounter gem for Debian. It
> is a dependency of pupilfirst.. The packed gem is available at
> https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/mentors/ruby-activerecord-precounter.
> Requesting for Sponsorship.
On ചൊ, ഒക്ടോ 5 2021 at 02:02:47 വൈകു -0300 -0300,
Leandro Cunha wrote:
Hi,
>> On ശ, സെപ്റ്റം 18, 2021 at 17:02, Leandro Cunha
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also
verified the
>> > points listed on
>> >
Hi,
This issue [1] is open for a while, but since lintian now recommends
using ruby:Depends we are seeing this issue in more cases (since even
packages that were not using ruby:Depends now starts using it).
On 1 October 2021 5:47:05 pm IST, RL
wrote:
>Thanks for maintaining ruby in debian. I've been a long-time user.
>
>This is not a complaint or a bug report, but a question - why does
>ruby2.7 depend on fonts-lato and libjs-jquery?
>
>particularly fonts-lato was surprising. I wondered if it was
On 1 October 2021 7:30:23 am IST, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>Hi there,
>
>most of you know that janitor/jenkins is committing to our repositories
>directly. However, I recently saw that it starts to commit changes targetted at
>buid-dependencies purely based on the fact that lintian might
On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 29 2021 at 07:01:11 വൈകു
+ +, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor them?
Uploaded, thanks.
It'd
On വ്യാ, സെപ്റ്റം 30 2021 at 04:37:02
രാവിലെ + +, Mohd Bilal wrote:
I have updated it now.
Uploaded, thanks.
On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 04:28:59 വൈകു
+ +, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hi,
I've packed ruby-gaffe[1] and is ready to be uploaded (I also
verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
This package is a dependency of pupilfirst[2]
On ശ, സെപ്റ്റം 25 2021 at 07:31:58 വൈകു +
+, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem `humanize`.It is
lintian clean. I've
uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/mdb571/ruby-humanize
This package is a
On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 07:53:59 വൈകു
+0530 +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
Hiya,
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 6:42 PM Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> As discussed on matrix [...]
Wherever the conversation is happening, if it's not GitLab
related, moving it to #debian-ruby would be good, I gu
On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 03:52:50
രാവിലെ +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 03:11:02
രാവിലെ +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
[3]ruby-scarf 0.2.6
Autopkgtest is failing for this.
Follow https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging/Tests for common
On ചൊ, സെപ്റ്റം 28 2021 at 03:11:02
രാവിലെ +0530 +0530, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
[3]ruby-scarf 0.2.6
Autopkgtest is failing for this.
Follow https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging/Tests for common
test failure scenarios.
On തി, സെപ്റ്റം 20 2021 at 07:27:30 വൈകു
+ +, mdbi...@disroot.org wrote:
September 21, 2021 12:34 AM, "Pirate Praveen"
wrote:
On തി, സെപ്റ്റം 20, 2021 at 10:14,
mdbi...@disroot.org wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem
damerau-leve
On തി, സെപ്റ്റം 27 2021 at 08:07:46 വൈകു
+ +, Mohd Bilal wrote:
Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
I added one more condition there now. You need to
On വെ, സെപ്റ്റം 24 2021 at 05:21:57 വൈകു
+0530 +0530, Vivek K J wrote:
Hi team,
I've packed uc.micro-rb gem as a debian package. The repo is
available at https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/ruby-uc.micro-rb .
Requesting for sponsorship. (This gem is a dependency of pupilfirst)
On വെ, സെപ്റ്റം 24 2021 at 02:21:13 വൈകു
+0530 +0530, Vivek K J wrote:
Hi team,
I've packed postmark module as a debian package. The repo is
available at https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/ruby-postmark.
Requesting for sponsorship. (This gem is a dependency of pupilfirst)
On 26/9/21 12:59 AM, Mohd Bilal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem attribute_normalizer.It is
> lintian clean. I've
> uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/mdb571/ruby-attribute-normalizer
>
> This package is
On 24/9/21 9:23 PM, Abraham Raji wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The ruby-gitlab-experiment package is ready to be uploaded (I also
> verified the
> points listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
> This package is a dependency for Gitlab.
>
>
On 24/9/21 4:51 PM, Vivek K J wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I've packed mdurl-rb gem as a debian package. The repo is
> available at https://salsa.debian.org/vivekkj/ruby-mdurl-rb. Requesting
> for sponsorship. (This gem is a dependency of pupilfirst)
>
Uploaded, thanks!
Next time, request
, Sep 20, 2021 at 11:16 PM Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On 20 September 2021 6:55:20 pm IST, Abraham Raji
wrote:
>>So if you really want to go ahead with the update, make sure
gitlab is not
>> broken with the new version.
>So I should build the current version of Gitlab from t
On തി, സെപ്റ്റം 20, 2021 at 10:14,
mdbi...@disroot.org wrote:
Hi,
I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem
damerau-levenshtein.It is lintian clean. I've
uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at
https://salsa.debian.org/mdb571/ruby-damerau-levenshtein
Hi,
On 20 September 2021 8:41:11 am IST, Leandro Cunha
wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Pirate Praveen
>wrote:
>
>> On ശ, സെപ്റ്റം 18, 2021 at 17:02, Leandro Cunha
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > The following packages are ready to be
On ശ, സെപ്റ്റം 18, 2021 at 17:02, Leandro Cunha
wrote:
Hi,
The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
points listed on
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
Could you please sponsor them?
ruby-money 6.16.0-1
Salsa:
. So if you
really want to go ahead with the update, make sure gitlab is not broken with
the new version. More generally all packages I'm listed as an uploader is a
likely dependency of gitlab or diaspora.
>Autopkgtest Log: http://paste.debian.net/1212120/
>
>
>On Fri, Sep 17, 20
On 17 September 2021 1:28:27 am IST, Abraham Raji
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The ruby-asciidoctor-kroki package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified
>the
>points listed on
>http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>
On 22/08/21 5:04 am, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Hideki Yamane
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
> pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> * Package name: ruby-parser
> Version : 3.0.2.0
> * URL :
2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 5:44:35 PM IST, Pirate Praveen ൽ
എഴുതി
>
>
>2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 10 12:44:39 PM IST, "László Böszörményi (GCS)"
>ൽ എഴുതി
>>Control: tags -1 +pending
>>
>>Hi Pirate,
>>
>>On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 8:51 PM Pirate Praveen
>>
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:50 pm, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:35:43AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:12 am, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
> [copying debian-ruby list]
>
> On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh
> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 12:12 am, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
[copying debian-ruby list]
On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh
wrote:
> Package: ruby-google-protobuf
> Version: 3.17.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear
[copying debian-ruby list]
On Sun, 08 Aug 2021 22:08:39 +0530 Akshay S Dinesh
wrote:
> Package: ruby-google-protobuf
> Version: 3.17.3-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I was trying to install gitlab to reproduce #966653
>
> Installed
Hi,
This is reported against asciidoctor but probably affects more packages.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?archive=no=991015
--
Sent from my p≡p for Android.
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 15:04:56 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:34:24PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:16 pm, Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
> > > Makes sense. Probably the time to RM ruby-re
On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 10:16 pm, Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
Makes sense. Probably the time to RM ruby-rexml from the archive is
*now*?
Requested removal from archive in #987101
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 12:05:29 +0200 Moritz Muehlenhoff
wrote:
>
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2021/04/05/xml-round-trip-vulnerability-in-rexml-cve-2021-28965/
>
> Why is there a separate package duplicating rexml from src:ruby2.7
in bullseye?
I think the separate package was introduced
On 2021, ഏപ്രിൽ 9 5:17:11 PM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 02:26:29PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:47 pm, Pirate Praveen
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We had to remove
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 7:47 pm, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
Hi,
We had to remove chef due to trademark issues, details here
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963750
Now gitlab from 13.10.0 needs the following dependencies from the
chef umbrella.
ohai | ~> 16.10
chef-con
Hi,
We had to remove chef due to trademark issues, details here
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=963750
Now gitlab from 13.10.0 needs the following dependencies from the chef
umbrella.
ohai | ~> 16.10
chef-config | >= 12.8, < 17
chef-utils | >= 16.0, < 17
libyajl2 | ~>
On 2021, ഏപ്രിൽ 5 5:33:14 AM IST, Sean Whitton wrote:
>Hello Pirate,
>
>On Mon 29 Mar 2021 at 11:50PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>>>> +--+
>>>> |Other comments|
>>>> +--+
>>>&g
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 11:21 pm, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to package ruby-magic-static gem as a new dependency of
gitlab 13.9.5, but it has a runtime dependency on mini_portile2 gem.
I vaguely remember removing that dependency in gemspec for some other
gem (found out 1.10.9
Hi,
I'm trying to package ruby-magic-static gem as a new dependency of
gitlab 13.9.5, but it has a runtime dependency on mini_portile2 gem. I
vaguely remember removing that dependency in gemspec for some other gem
(found out 1.10.9 version of nokogiri gem used it). Do we really need
to
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:24 pm, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On 2021, മാർച്ച് 21 2:30:08 AM IST, Sean Whitton
wrote:
+--+
| REJECT reasoning |
+--+
At least the following files have different copyright
holders/licenses:
src_port_qsort.c
On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 5:26 pm, Cédric Boutillier
wrote:
Hi Praveen,
Le Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:24:58PM +0530, Pirate Praveen a écrit :
>A huge amount of uncompiled source code is installed into /usr/lib;
>shouldn't it be in /usr/share, and installed arch:all?
These are used
On 2021, മാർച്ച് 21 2:30:08 AM IST, Sean Whitton
wrote:
>
>+--+
>| REJECT reasoning |
>+--+
>
>At least the following files have different copyright holders/licenses:
>src_port_qsort.c contrib_pgcrypto_sha1.c sha1.h src_port_erand48.c
I have fixed
On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> [adding release team]
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>> > Hi Praveen,
>> >
>> >
[adding release team]
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta
wrote:
Hi Praveen,
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen
wrote:
It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will have to
disable tests for the following packages. I don't think there is
another way
It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will have to
disable tests for the following packages. I don't think there is
another way, thoughts?
No reverse dependencies.
reverse-depends -b ruby-vcr
Reverse-Build-Depends
* nanoc
* ruby-coveralls
* ruby-graphlient
* ruby-mixlib-install
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 9:30 pm, deivid
wrote:
It seems like this issue:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rubygems-integration/-/merge_requests/2.
Not sure if it was resolved already.
Thanks Deivid and Utkarsh. I will try updating rubygems-intergation.
Hi,
I have ruby 2.7.1 currently in buster-fasttrack (fasttrack.debian.net)
and I'm trying to update it to 2.7.2
The build went fine, but bundler (2.1.4-2~bpo10+1) seems broken now. Do
I need to update bundler as well for this to work?
# ruby --version
ruby 2.7.2p137 (2020-10-01 revision
Package: ftp.debian.org
X-DebBugs-CC: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
In debian ruby_parser was originally packaged under ruby-parser instead
of ruby-ruby-parser but we renamed ruby-parser to ruby-ruby-parser
making the old ruby-parser obsolete. All reverse dependencies are
updated already to
On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 1 1:37:05 AM IST, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
>and I have updated status of each failed package here,
>https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-faraday/-/snippets/504
>
>Thanks to Utkarsh for quickly fixing ruby-gh and ruby-behance. Now we
>only have to fix ruby-vcr
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 23:19, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
Though most failures seems this, which is a missing dependency in
ruby-faraday.
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/rubygems/specification.rb:1398:in `rescue
in block in activate_dependencies': Could not find 'ruby2_keywords'
(>= 0) among
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 22:58, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
Hi,
ruby-faraday 1.0 was in experimental for quite some time. I have
updated it to 1.1.0 now and planning to upload to unstable in 2 days
if there is no objection.
Here is the meta/build logs
https://people.debian.org/~praveen/ruby
Hi,
ruby-faraday 1.0 was in experimental for quite some time. I have
updated it to 1.1.0 now and planning to upload to unstable in 2 days if
there is no objection.
Here is the meta/build logs
https://people.debian.org/~praveen/ruby-faraday-meta-build/
Some of those failed packages are
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 14:27, Daniel Leidert
wrote:
nokogumbo ships its own sources of the gumbo library which btw hasn't
seen any
activity since 2015. It contains significant changes to libgumbo-dev
and is
incompatible. Either we build against the internal source and
statically link
the
On 2020, നവംബർ 10 9:23:45 PM IST, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>Ok. The github sources don't contain a .gemspec file but the gem does. The
>.gemspec is created by a rake task in Rakefile.
>
>Three options:
>1) Add a patch to create the .gemspec file.
>2) Run the rake task to create the gemspec file
Hi ruby team,
I'm trying to update ruby-nokogumbo to 2.x and the build fails since it
cannot find nokogiri.h. I can see we have to not included nokogiri.h in
the binary package so I tried to include it in include-headers branch
in salsa (a proof of concept now as it hard codes paths). But
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:29, Klaumi Klingsporn
wrote:
Am / On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:45:56 +0200
schrieb / wrote Daniel Leidert :
Git is much more easy then it probably looks. Again I
speak from my own experience. We have some workflows and
can help you setup the environment (there are
[Adding pkg-javascript-devel list]
On 2020, ഒക്ടോബർ 26 12:14:08 AM IST, Daniel Leidert
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>the jekyll build fails at the moment because livereload.js created in the
>override_dh_auto_build target is not created. The creation prints some
>warnings:
>
>> make[1]: Entering directory
Hi,
I have been able to package almost all dependencies of diaspora
(compass and sass gems had to be embedded because they are no longer
supported upstream and their debian packages got removed from the
archive) and now facing a tough ui bug (no error during
build/assets:precompile). Details
On 19/09/20 3:30 am, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please mention the MPL license of
> webdrivers-4.4.1/spec/webdrivers/geckodriver_spec.rb
> in your debian/copyright.
>
> Thanks!
> Thorsten
>
This is a false positive. It is matching the output of a different
program not part of this
Hi,
I have managed to replace uglify-harmony.js (embedded copy, generated
file, not packaged in debian and unmaintained upstream) with terser in
ruby-uglifier. Here is the initial rough patch.
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-uglifier/-/blob/master/debian/patches/005-use-terser.patch
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:28, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
I was suggesting this in case only those two gems need packaging. But
if a lot more needs to be packaged, we can keep the tests disabled.
Uploaded, thanks Cocoa for your work.
On 2020, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 10 3:36:19 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>Hiya,
>
>On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 6:31 PM Pirate Praveen
>wrote:
>> We don't need to package every development dependency, only those required
>> for functional tests need to be packaged. So mutant-rspec
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 01:54, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
After removing yarnpkg from Depends of ruby-webpacker, its
autopkgtest started failing, this needs to be fixed now.
This is now fixed, and if we can belive
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rails we should see rails migrating to
testing
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:33 pm, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 20:13, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of
current
blockers for rails 6
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 20:13, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 02:03:41AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi,
As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of
current
blockers for rails 6 transition.
1. node-yarnpkg blocked by node-babel removal (need
>Okay. So should I try to redo it from the github tarball? I've already
>pushed the changes, so the latest commits by me would have to be
>reverted and the package redone.
You don't need to redo any changes. Just consider it as another upstream
version. Since we have not uploaded the new
On 2020, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 27 12:02:56 PM IST, Cocoa wrote:
>
>On 8/27/20 2:58 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>
>> On 2020, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 26 7:38:31 PM IST, Cocoa wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
>>
On 2020, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 26 7:38:31 PM IST, Cocoa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
>points listed
>onhttp://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>
>Could you please sponsor them?
>
> ruby-js-regex 3.4.0-1
You need to
On 2020, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 24 12:14:49 AM IST, Cocoa wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
>points listed
>onhttp://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>
>Could you please sponsor them?
>
> ruby-character-set 1.4.0
Uploaded,
Hi,
As discussed in today's ruby team BoF, I'm sending the list of current
blockers for rails 6 transition.
1. node-yarnpkg blocked by node-babel removal (need to port to
node-babel7) - via ruby-webpackager which is currently in Depends for
rails meta package (rails new foo needs it). One
On 2020, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 17 6:44:26 AM IST, Abraham Raji
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified
>thepoints listed on
>http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).Could
>you please sponsor them?
>
>ruby-health-check/3.0.0-1 repo
Did
Hi team,
ruby-karmdown 2.x was in experimental from July 22 and bugs were filed
for packages failing rebuild or autopkgtest with it. This also includes
fixes for security issues.
jekyll (both), rabbit (autopkgtest), ruby-cucumber-core (rebuild -
boutil promised to fix this in irc),
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 22:02, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
With help from Kartik Kulkarni, we have managed to file bugs for all
rebuild/autopkgtest failures except for two packages
(ruby-diaspora-federation-rails, which is a dependency on diaspora
and ruby-voight-kampff which is a dependency
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 18:25, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:06, terce...@debian.org wrote:
Don't you already have the results and the FTBFS logs? I think they
should receive the bugs at the same time as rails 6 is updated in
unstable.
I'd love to do that as well
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:06, terce...@debian.org wrote:
Don't you already have the results and the FTBFS logs? I think they
should receive the bugs at the same time as rails 6 is updated in
unstable.
I'd love to do that as well. But I can't promise if I will be able to
file all the bugs.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 01:19, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
This sprint is mainly to file bugs before we upload to unstable. So
should be before August, if weekend on 25th is better we can do that.
In August we can do another one to fix broken packages after rails 6
hits unstable.
I have been
Hi,
I think we should change these two variables in gem2deb/dh_ruby
DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_WHITELIST_APPEND
DH_RUBY_GEM_INSTALL_BLACKLIST_APPEND
I think WHITELIST_APPEND can be changed to INCLUDE and BLACKLIST_APPEND to
EXCLUDE.
We can print a warning first and then remove them later.
See
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 22:00, stefa...@debian.org wrote:
I was maintaining a few pkg-ruby-extras libraries to support the Chef
stack, which was recently removed from Debian.
Anyone want to pick up maintenance of them? Otherwise I'll file WNPP
bugs.
$ reverse-depends -b
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 16:28, terce...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:43:39PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi,
I have documented the steps to triage failures and categorize it at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails/-/wikis/Transition-to-Rails-6-for-Debian-Bullseye
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 15 10:38:31 AM IST, "Marc Dequènes (duck)"
wrote:
>I'm not sure I get what's wrong with my initial mail even if I
>understand that was what triggered this heated discussion. As said above
>Praveen's words led me to badly asses the situation. The fact Beuc
>ended-up here
Hi,
I have documented the steps to triage failures and categorize it at
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails/-/wikis/Transition-to-Rails-6-for-Debian-Bullseye#todo
Any help is welcome. I was thinking about an online sprint to do this
for all packages that failed rebuilds/autopkgtests. How
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 7 7:36:23 PM IST, "Marc Dequènes (duck)"
wrote:
>Quack Beuc,
>
>Long time no quack.
>
>On 2020-07-06 22:27, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>
>> I was reacting to redmine actually.
>
>Maintainer bit here o/
>
>Well I have to admit I do not agree with Praveen's conception. The
>general
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 6 6:57:39 PM IST, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 06/07/2020 09:55, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> On 2020, ജൂലൈ 6 1:09:09 PM IST, Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>>> On 06/07/2020 09:01, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>>>> My main motivation for maintaini
y the regression.
>>
>> Attaching the debdiff for reference. The changes looks good to me, but
>> I defintively would like to see a second pair of eyes here from the
>> rails maintainers, in particular for CVE-2020-8163, Utkarsh?
>>
>> There is no lost work,
Hi,
My main motivation for maintaining rails is for gitlab. Since gitlab is not in
stable, I don't usually do stable updates of rails (I think Utkarsh does it
usually). I provide rails updates via buster-backports or fasttrack.debian.net.
I think redmine is also supported via buster-backports
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 00:27, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 00:22, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:47, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:06:56PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I don't really care if you include it in fasttrack
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 00:22, Pirate Praveen
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:47, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:06:56PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I don't really care if you include it in fasttrack.
As people started reporting more bugs, I decided to add ruby
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:47, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:06:56PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I don't really care if you include it in fasttrack.
As people started reporting more bugs, I decided to add ruby 2.7 to
fasttrack.
Some issues that popped up,
ruby
Hi,
Just a reminder about upcoming rails 6 upload to unstable.
Current status:
https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/rails/-/wikis/Transition-to-Rails-6-for-Debian-Bullseye
Need help for filing bugs for packages that failed meta/build from the
meta/build logs.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:26, Antonio Terceiro
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 05:21:53PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
Hi,
gitlab stopped working with ruby 2.5 (they officially dropped
support long
ago, but it was working fine till now). See
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab
Hi,
gitlab stopped working with ruby 2.5 (they officially dropped support
long ago, but it was working fine till now). See
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/225251 for details. In
last stable release we were lucky things worked with ruby 2.3 even
though it was not officially
101 - 200 of 758 matches
Mail list logo
