Re: RC bugs against your packages

Hi, On 2/8/20, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Otherwise, I propose to file an RM bug against them all very shortly (~2 > weeks). Feel free. I don't work with Chef for a long time, so I'm unable to properly maintain them. > If anyone else is willing to work on it, please let me know :) Chef community

Re: RFS: unicorn-4.5.1-2

I meant 5.4.1-2 :) On 1/13/19, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > Please upload unicorn-4.5.1-2 (Closes: #918916) > > Thanks in advance. >

RFS: unicorn-4.5.1-2

Hi team! Please upload unicorn-4.5.1-2 (Closes: #918916) Thanks in advance.

Re: Error while building ruby-em-websocket

On 7/31/18, Manas Kashyap wrote: > yes , i packaged it , and yet to be uploaded , u can check it in > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-em-websocket-client . So you packaged its old version which doesn't support 2nd argument to .connect method while ruby-em-websocket needs an updated

Re: Error while building ruby-em-websocket

On 7/31/18, Manas Kashyap wrote: > I am trying to package ruby-em-websocket. > I am getting an error while doing so (i do packaging work in a Debian Sid > container), can anyone help me out in resolving this error > > error :- http://paste.debian.net/1035969/ Do we have em-websocket-client

RFS: ruby-mixlib-config

Hi team! I've prepared a new version of ruby-mixlib-config, please upload it. Thanks in advance.

Re: ruby-gettext-setup: FTBFS

On 4/5/18, Georg Faerber wrote: >> /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/gettext/tools/parser/ruby.rb is UTF-8 file, Oops, wrong file. spec/lib/gettext-setup/gettext_setup_spec.rb is a proper one. > Please go ahead and feel free to fix the package; I failed to do so > yesterday, but I've

Re: ruby-gettext-setup: FTBFS [Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve]

On 4/4/18, Georg Faerber wrote: >> I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually >> use anything from gettext gem, only from fast-gettext. So its test >> failures caused by something else, not the new gettext version. > I would be interested in how you

Re: RFS: ruby-celulloid 0.16.0-5, fix for #892192

On 3/24/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Uploaded. I added Testsuite: autopkgtests-pkg-ruby and a patch to create > the log used in specs in a temporary directory to fix autopkgtests. Thanks! I hope Buster won't have this package as it has fewer and fewer rev deps :)

RFS: ruby-celulloid 0.16.0-5, fix for #892192

Hi team! I've prepared updated ruby-celulloid 0.16.0-5 with fix for #892192 and usual updates like vcs-*, dh level etc. Please review and upload. Branch is debian/sid not master.

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/22/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I would rather see this minimal patch to disallow gecode engine in > ruby-solve, and a Breaks: berkshelf (<= current version) > instead of the Conflicts: ruby-dep-selector. > I think it would ease a lot upgrade path if we just prevent

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/21/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Is it "normal" that ruby-gettext-setup tests fail with the new > ruby-gettext? They seem to pass with the current version on > ci.debian.net. I've checked ruby-gettext-setup and can say that it doesn't actually use anything from gettext

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

On 3/20/18, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Could you please update the Standards-Version field and the debhelper > compatibility for these packages, as well as switching the debian/watch > to https? Done. I usually don't change them if lintian doesn't say to. > Can you clarify

orphaned and to be removed packages

Hi team! A few years ago I've prepared several packages required to run berkshelf-api, a build dependency for berkshelf. Now berkshelf-api is deprecated, so I'm going to request its removal from Debian. As a preparation for this step I removed myself from uploaders from certain packages: *

RFS: ruby-tzinfo, ruby-gettext, ruby-kgio, ruby-solve

Hi team! I've prepared new version for the following packages: * just a new minor version + vcs-* updated: - ruby-tzinfo - ruby-gettext - ruby-kgio * a new major version + d/control changes to prevent broken ruby-dep-selector installation - ruby-solve Please review and upload

Re: RFS: ruby-molinillo 0.6.4-1

On 3/14/18, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > This new version breaks the current version of bundler, I would expect > that to be specified in debian/control. Fixed.

RFS: ruby-buff-config 2.0.0-2

Hi team, Please review and upload ruby-buff-config 2.0.0-2 Thanks in advance!

RFS: ruby-molinillo 0.6.4-1

Hi team, I've prepared a new release of ruby-molinillo, required for bundler 0.16 and ruby-solve 4.0. Please review and upload. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-ridley 5.1.1

Hi team, I've prepared ruby-ridley 5.1.1, please review and upload.

ruby-molinillo

Hi team, For ruby-solve update I need ruby-molinillo ~> 0.6, besides ruby-solve the only its reverse dependency is ruby-bundler. Current bundler version in sid (1.15.1) depends on 0.5 but prepared in git 0.16.1 needs 0.6. So I have 2 questions: 1. Any objections to upload ruby-molinillo 0.6.4?

Re: Uploading gitlab 9.5 to unstable

Hi Praveen! On 2/20/18, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Hleb, > Can you confirm if berkshelf-api is compatible with grape 0.19.2? Please ignore berkshelf-api, it's deprecated and should be removed from Debian.

Re: Renaming ruby-factory-girl to ruby-factory-bot

On 2/19/18, Georg Faerber wrote: > I've worked on this now, and would be more than happy, if someone could > review my work [1]. Note: That's not yet ready for upload, before, I d/changelog: Please remove this line as this is not an initial release: * Initial release.

RFS: a lot off

Hi team, I've prepared new versions for the following packages: * ruby-buff-ignore * ruby-semverse * ruby-tzinfo * ruby-raindrops * ruby-kgio * ruby-gettext Please upload them. Thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: berkshelf for bpo9

On 8/16/17, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > berkshelf must be in testing before being uploaded to backports. It was when I wrote RFS :)

Re: RFS: ruby-buff-config

On 8/14/17, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > Could you fix these things below? > > * ruby-buff-config source: quilt-patch-missing-description remove-spork > * ruby-buff-config: extended-description-is-probably-too-short Done.

RFS: ruby-buff-config

Hi team, please upload a new version of ruby-buff-config. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-varia-model

Hi team! Please upload new version of ruby-varia-model. It may break ruby-ridley and some other berkshelf related packages, but I'm preparing their updates. Thanks in advance.

RFS: berkshelf for bpo9

Hi team! Please upload berkshelf 4.3.5-2~bpo9+1 to backports. It was not fixed in time during the freeze so I was advised to provide it though backports. Branch stretch-backport in git repo. Thanks in advance.

RFS: berkshelf for bpo9

Hi team! Please upload berkshelf 4.3.5-2~bpo9+1 to backports. It was not fixed in time during the freeze so I was advised to provide it though backports. Branch stretch-backport in git repo. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-varia-model

Hi team! Please upload new version of ruby-varia-model. It may break ruby-ridley and some other berkshelf related packages, but I'm preparing their updates. Thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: ruby-buff-extensions

On 7/27/17, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > these reverse dependencies will fail theirs tests with this update on > the dependency check step (they expect ~> 1.0): > > berkshelf > ruby-buff-config > ruby-varia-model ... > ruby-ridley > > I'm uploading anyway, can you please handle

RFS: ruby-buff-extensions

Hi team! I've prepared update for ruby-buff-extensions, please review and upload. Despite major version change it doesn't have incompatible changes so shouldn't break anything. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-mixlib-archive with CVE fix

Hi team! I've prepared a fix for CVE-2017-126 (#868572) for Stretch, please review and upload (branch 'stretch'). Thanks in advance.

debdiff

Hi team, Could you advice how to make debdiff properly? When I do "debdiff berkshelf_4.3.5-1.dsc berkshelf_4.3.5-2.dsc" its output contains diff for changelog and lintian-overrides but not for patches/*.

RFS: berkshelf, fixing RC bug

Hi team, please upload berkshelf 4.5.3-2, it has 2 changes: - fix for failure in sbuild - fix new lintian warnings Thanks in advance.

RFS: reel, fix for the serious bug #841704

Hi team, please upload reel 0.6.1-2, it fixes #841704 (as ruby-certificate-authority is packaged then use it and don't provide pregenerated certificates). Thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: ruby-gettext

Please don't upload, I want to fix another issue. On 11/3/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > Please upload ruby-gettext 3.2.2-2, it fixes #840789 among other changes. >

RFS: ruby-gettext

Hi team! Please upload ruby-gettext 3.2.2-2, it fixes #840789 among other changes.

Re: RFS: berkshelf

On 10/18/16, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > The autopkgtests fail (425 failures) because of permissions to create a > subdirectory (425 times the same error). > > 425) ::log returns Berkshelf::Logger >Failure/Error: FileUtils.mkdir_p(tmp_path) > >Errno::EACCES: >

Re: RFS: berkshelf

Hi! On 10/13/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> I've disabled cucumber tests not working in sbuild. Please upload. > New build log with test failures attached. I managed to setup working sbuild on sid machine and found all failures at last. After several rebuild I have no new

Re: sbuild question

On 10/12/16, Cédric Boutillier wrote: >> I've tried to rebuild berkshelf with sbuild, but the only result is the >> message: >> E: Core build dependencies not satisfied; skipping > or even rebuild one from scratch (using for example the setup script in > the team main repo)

Re: RFS: berkshelf

On 10/10/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Unfortunately it does not appear to build in sbuild. I'm attaching > the log. I've disabled cucumber tests not working in sbuild. Please upload.

Re: RFS: berkshelf

Hi team! Kindly reminding about my request. On 9/27/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > I've prepared berkshelf (tool to manage chef's cookbooks) for upload. > Please review and upload it if it's in a good shape. > > Thanks in advance. >

RFS: ruby-tzinfo, RC bug fixed

Hi team! Recently tzdata priority was lowered so in build environments its not installed anymore. This causes test failures for packages which depends on ruby-tzinfo. I've prepared a new release ruby-tzinfo, now it depends on tzdata. Please upload. Thanks in advance!

RFS: berkshelf

Hi team! I've prepared berkshelf (tool to manage chef's cookbooks) for upload. Please review and upload it if it's in a good shape. Thanks in advance.

Re: trying to update unicorn to 5.1, build failure: VERSION= must be specified

On 9/19/16, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Its pushed to alioth. Can someone check? > > Error below: > > $ clean > dh clean --buildsystem=ruby --with ruby,systemd >dh_testdir -O--buildsystem=ruby >dh_auto_clean -O--buildsystem=ruby > dh_ruby --clean >dh_ruby

Re: RFS: ruby-aruba (RC bug fixing)

On 9/16/16, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > I activated the autopkgtest (see commit c06a49c), and when I try to run > the autopkgtests, I get one failure: > > > 1) Aruba::Api files #copy when source is existing when destination is > non-existing when source is file when source is

RFS: ruby-aruba (RC bug fixing)

Hi team! Please upload ruby-aruba. It has RC bug fixed.

RFS: ruby-aruba (RC bug fixing)

Hi team! I've prepared NMU for ruby-aruba fixing #836735 (uninitialized constant Aruba::CommandMonitor::Utils). Please upload. Thanks in advance. Hideki Yamane, could you update pristine-tar branch as it's missing the latest orig.tar.gz?

Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen

On 8/30/16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > uploaded. I have made 1 commit on top (93fab5c) to bump debhelper > compat level and use https in Vcs-Git. Thank you! > I hope you have plans to push a good part of those patches upstream. ;-) They are very debian-specific, maybe I can

Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen

On 8/28/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> * test-kitchen (a new package) >> lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also >> under >> a different license than the rest of the package; this needs to be >> mentioned i

Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen

On 8/27/16, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > uploaded these three Thanks! >> * test-kitchen (a new package) > > judging by the amount of patches, this seems to be a reasonably problematic > package! :-o > > lib/vendor/hash_recursive_merge.rb is not properly namespaced. it is also

Re: RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen

On 8/15/16, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi team! > > Kindly reminding that I've pushed the following packages for review and > upload. Reminding again :) > * ruby-gettext (updated to the latest upstream version) > * ruby-solve (like above) > * ruby-mi

Re: RFS: ruby-fast-blank

On 8/17/16, Sruthi wrote: > I packaged the gem because it is listed as one of the dependencies for > Discourse. Why just not to patch Discourse?

Re: RFS: ruby-fast-blank

On 8/17/16, Sruthi Chandran wrote: > Hi,I prepared the packaging of ruby-fast-blank. It is lintian cleanand > I tested it with build-and-upload script from pkg-ruby-extras repo. > > As my membership request to alioth is still pending, I've added my > packageto the

RFS: ruby-gettext, ruby-solve, ruby-mixlib-archive, test-kitchen

Hi team! Kindly reminding that I've pushed the following packages for review and upload. * ruby-gettext (updated to the latest upstream version) * ruby-solve (like above) * ruby-mixlib-archive (a new package, dependency for berkshelf ITP) * test-kitchen (a new package) Thanks in advance.

we don't need ruby-tzinfo-data

Hi Andrew & team. We don't need ruby-tzinfo-data as ruby-tzinfo works perfectly with system tz data without any additional patches.

RFS: ruby-mixlib-install 1.1.0-1

Hi team! I've prepared a new version of ruby-mixlib-install (1.1.0-1), please review and upload it. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-msgpack 1.0.0-1

Hi team. I've prepared a new upstream version of ruby-msgpack, it's required for a new version of ruby-grape-msgpack which is compatible with currently uploaded version of ruby-grape. Please review and upload, thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-versioning, ruby-mixlib-shellout

On 5/13/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Done. Thanks. > Note: current Standards-Version is 3.9.8, not 3.9.7. I suppose it was 3.9.7 when I prepared these packages (or my lintian is outdated).

RFS: ruby-mixlib-versioning, ruby-mixlib-shellout

Hi team. Please review and upload: 1. ruby-mixlib-shellout -- update to the latest upstream version 2. ruby-mixlib-versioning -- new package These uploads are required for test-kitchen package I'm working on. Thanks in advance.

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On 4/25/16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: >> 1) upstream is not merged to master > > Intentional. See gbp.conf. Okay, but it's not a layout used by ruby-pkg-extras team afaik. >> 2) as ghi is an application not a library I consider to rename the >> package to just ghi > > Sorry, I

Re: ghi: please review (new package, CLI interface to GitHub issue tracker)

On 4/25/16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: > Since I'm not very experienced in packaging Ruby apps may I ask for quick > review of my work please? Package repository can be found here: > >https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-ghi.git 1) upstream is not merged to

RFS: ruby-mixlib-versioning, ruby-mixlib-shellout

Hi team. Please review and upload: 1. ruby-mixlib-shellout -- update to the latest upstream version 2. ruby-mixlib-versioning -- new package These uploads are required for test-kitchen package I'm working on. Thanks in advance.

Re: uploading to jessie-backports (Re: migrating to Debian gitlab)

On 4/10/16, Pirate Praveen wrote: > Here is the sequential list of dependencies > https://gitlab.com/debian-ruby/backportr/blob/master/lib/gitlab_sequential.txt You don't need to backport ruby-tzinfo. Current version in stable has required patch backported (#798348).

RFS: ruby-aruba, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

Hi team! Please upload: - ruby-aruba 0.14.1-2. I've only dropped unneeded ruby-event-bus from dependencies. - ruby-berkshelf-api-client 2.0.2-1. New upstream version and tests are run during build process. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-aruba, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

Hi team! Please upload: - ruby-aruba 0.14.1-2. I've only dropped unneeded ruby-event-bus from dependencies. - ruby-berkshelf-api-client 2.0.2-1. New upstream version and tests are run during build process. Thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack, berkshelf-api

On 3/24/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Both uploaded. Thanks!

RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack, berkshelf-api

Hi team. Please upload new version of ruby-grape-msgpack. Besides of automated changes made by Cédric it has the following: - checks gem dependencies during a build process - relaxes ruby-grape dependency in gemfile And when it reaches archive then please upload berkshelf-api. It's a new

RFS: ruby-ridley

Hi team! Please upload ruby-ridley 4.4.3-2. It has several Depends and Build-Depends fixes. Thanks in advance.

Re: RFS: reel

On 3/18/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> Please review and upload reel, a Celluloid::IO based web server. > > reel.git is empty? Git says "Everything up-to-date" https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ruby-extras/reel.git shows all data.

Re: RFS: ruby-mixlib-install, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

On 3/10/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> * ruby-mixlib-install > > Done/Uploaded. Thanks! >> * ruby-berkshelf-api-client > > Has distribution as UNSTABLE in d/changelog. > > For both, please fix the vcs-field-uses-insecure-uri vcs-git lintian Fixed. > hint. I /think/ the

Re: RFS: ruby-websocket-extensions, ruby-websocket-driver

On 3/6/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> Please upload a new package ruby-websocket-extensions. > > Missing upstream + pristine-tar branches + tags in git :-) As usually :) Fixed.

RFS: ruby-websocket-extensions, ruby-websocket-driver

Hi team! Please upload a new package ruby-websocket-extensions. When it reaches unstable, please upload updated ruby-websocket-driver with fix for #816882 (I'll send additional request if it will take to long for ruby-websocket-extensions to enter archive). Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-mixlib-install, ruby-berkshelf-api-client

Hi team, please review and upload these new packages: * ruby-mixlib-install * ruby-berkshelf-api-client I need to packages Chef related tools Berkshelf and Test-Kitchen. Thanks in advance.

RFS: ruby-raindrops

Hi team, I've pushed new version of ruby-raindrops, please upload. Thanks in advance. ruby-raindrops (0.16.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Imported Upstream version 0.16.0 * Drop 0003-test-test_linux.rb-use-plain-ASCII-in-tempfile-name.patch * Reflect license change to LGPL-2.1+ -- Hleb

Re: RFS: unicorn

On 2/12/16, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > Hleb, > > > * Rahulkrishnan R A [160212 16:52]: >> I have updated unicorn to the latest version. It is lintian clean and >> tested with pbuilder. Further information about this package can be >> accessed from

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo for jessie, fixes #798348

On 9/14/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch. >>> >>> Did you talk to -release about this already? >> >> No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't >> know t

Re: Request review for ruby gem packages.

On 1/14/16, Andrew Lee wrote: common issue: compat sh'ld be 9, so debhlper version >= 9~ > 1. ruby-combustion install docs and templates patch source_root (generator.rb) to use templates from proper place > 2. ruby-appraiser-reek and > 3. ruby-appraiser-rubocop you sh'ld

Re: Request review for ruby gem packages.

On 1/14/16, Andrew Lee wrote: > 7. ruby-racc We already have this package, it's called `racc'.

Re: Request review for ruby gem packages.

On 12/19/15, Andrew Lee wrote: > Would you mind to help to review again? I drop a look on git snapshot of Dec 30, so some notes may be outdated, I see you have updated some packages. Common: 0. A lot of missing years in copyrights > 1. ruby-acts-as-list, have you tried to

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser ruby-httpclient ruby-tzinfo

On 10/14/15, Per Andersson wrote: >> and ruby-tzinfo to stable. > > From what I can see ruby-tzinfo still needs to be uploaded to stable, > is it so? Yes, so far.

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser ruby-httpclient

On 10/12/15, Per Andersson wrote: > Oh, forgot to say: Thanks for your work! :-) Thanks for your upload! I was waiting for ages for it :)

Re: RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser ruby-httpclient

On 10/1/15, Pirate Praveen wrote: > One test is failing in pbuilder, can you have a look at it? > > Error: test_basic_auth_post_with_multipart(TestAuth): > HTTPClient::KeepAliveDisconnected: HTTPClient::KeepAliveDisconnected: > Connection reset by peer Is it

Re: lintian. how to shut it up?

On 9/23/15, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > using the correct syntax for lintian overrides might do the trick: > > ruby-locale: package-contains-timestamped-gzip > usr/share/ruby-locale/data/languages.tab.gz > ruby-locale: package-contains-timestamped-gzip >

lintian. how to shut it up?

Hi team. I'm using Lintian v2.5.35~bpo8+1, ruby-locales contains 2 gzipped files. As these files came from upstream I want make lintian to shut up. I put file debian/lintian-overrides with content: ruby-locale: package-contains-timestamped-gzip usr/share/ruby-locale/data/languages.tab.gz

RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser ruby-httpclient ruby-tzinfo

Hi team. Please upload ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser to unstable, ruby-httpclient ot experimental (or unstable) and ruby-tzinfo to stable.

Re: Help needed with a locale-related issue

On 9/16/15, Francesco Poli wrote: > I see that the forwarded report has been closed. I have a doubt, > though: would the patch fix the issue when LANGUAGE='it' LC_CTYPE=C ? LC_CTYPE should not affect message language, it affects sorting order. So the issue you've

Re: Help needed with a locale-related issue

On 9/14/15, Francesco Poli wrote: > Hence, it seems to me that the trouble is not caused by the original > string, but by those translated strings that include non-ASCII UTF-8 > characters and are somehow sent as non-UTF-8 non-pure-ASCII strings, > whenever LC_CTYPE=C

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo for jessie, fixes #798348

On 9/8/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch. >> >> Did you talk to -release about this already? > > No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't > know the procedure. I've r

Re: Request review for ruby gem packages.

On 9/9/15, Andrew Lee wrote: > Please check if anything are still missing? 0. All packages need description to be fixed (expand, wrap, don't start with article), see lintian messages. 1. ruby-acts-as-list, have you tried to build it? It sh'ld have ruby-activerecord and

Re: Help needed with a locale-related issue

On 9/14/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: > It looks like a ruby-gettext error, GNU gettext in such cases returns > original string (because LC_MESSAGES=C), but I should check docs for > gettext. ruby-locale, actually. Feel free to report bug against it.

Re: Help needed with a locale-related issue

On 9/1/15, Francesco Poli wrote: ... > But, if I try the following odd locale configuration (Italian language > with 'C' locale settings), I get a crash: > > $ LANGUAGE='it_IT:it' LC_ALL='C' locale > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > LANGUAGE=it_IT:it > LC_CTYPE="C" >

RFS: ruby-tzinfo for jessie, fixes #798348

Hi team! Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch.

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo for jessie, fixes #798348

On 9/8/15, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: >> Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch. > > Did you talk to -release about this already? No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't know the procedure.

Re: Request review for ruby gem packages.

Re-replying to list, sorry for personal. On 9/7/15, Andrew Lee (李健秋) wrote: I've looked only on 2 packages from your list. > ruby-rails-tokeninput No repositories found > ruby-coccon 1. patches should got to debian/patches/ 2. patch engine-root.patch should not

Re: RFS: ruby-little-plugger 1.1.4-1

On 8/29/15, Michael Moll kved...@kvedulv.de wrote: The following package is IMHO ready to be uploaded: Thanks, but actually it's not ready, please patch spec_helper.rb to prevent failure on deb-ci (just replace 'require …' with 'require little-plugger'). I've got a not pushed patch but it's on a

RFS: ruby-grape-msgpack ruby-websocket-parser ruby-httpclient

Hi team. Please review and upload the following new packages: - ruby-grape-msgpack - ruby-websocket-parser They are dependencies for berkshelf dependencies. And review and upload to experimental new upstream version of ruby-httpclient. Then if your package depends on ruby-httpclient please

Re: RFS: racc, coderay, ruby-rdiscount, ruby-ref, ruby-redis (and question about ruby-aruba)

On 8/19/15, Sebastien Badia s...@sebian.fr wrote: If someone have an idea, I've an issue with ruby-aruba, I'm trying to import the 0.8.1 version (in order to close 794157), but I'have a strange merge issue… (using a pretty standard way) $ uscan $ gbp import-orig

Re: RFS: racc, coderay, ruby-rdiscount, ruby-ref, ruby-redis (and question about ruby-aruba)

On 8/20/15, Sebastien Badia s...@sebian.fr wrote: ruby-contracts(0.11.0-1) is ready for an initial upload (ITP: 796228), the package is in our (pkg-ruby-extras) git namespace. If someone want to take a look. I think it has higher chances to be uploaded if you ask for RFS in a separate

  1   2   >