Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

2005-05-26 Пенетрантность Andrei Emeltchenko
. Андрей - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:27 AM Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: > > > Hi, > > sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained > > > ..

Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

2005-05-26 Пенетрантность Nefedov . Yuri
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Andrei Emeltchenko wrote: Hi, sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained ... skip => gcc-3.2 -pedantic init_test.c init_test.c:20: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:' init_test.c:21: warning: obsolete use of designated initializer with `:'

Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

2005-05-26 Пенетрантность Andrei Emeltchenko
Hi, sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained - Original Message - From: "Andrei Emeltchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:57 AM Subject: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x gcc-2.95 gcc-3.4 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c

Re: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

2005-05-26 Пенетрантность Andrei Emeltchenko
Hi, sorry for this post, but somehow it is self-explained - Original Message - From: "Andrei Emeltchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 9:57 AM Subject: gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x gcc-2.95 gcc-3.4 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c

gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.x

2005-05-25 Пенетрантность Andrei Emeltchenko
?, ?? ?? ? ??? ? ? 2 ???: gcc-2.95 gcc-3.4 ---?? --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:gcc-bug$ gcc-3.4 init-test.c init-test.c:23: error: initializer element is not constant init-test.c:23: error: (near initialization for `union_table[0]') --