Bug#499833: chccwdev cannot set device offline in Lenny

2010-01-25 Thread Stephen Powell
On 2010-01-25 at 05:58:04 +0100, Franz Pop wrote: If there still is an issue affecting current kernels, you will probably get much more response reporting it to the upstream kernel developers than with a Debian bug report. I'm just trying to follow the rules. From

Re: Bug#566649: s390-tools: New upstream version 1.8.3 available

2010-01-25 Thread Peter Oberparleiter
On 24.01.2010 21:53, Frans Pop wrote: I've chosen to leave the following components disabled for now as I'm unsure how relevant they are for Debian: - osasnmpd (was already disabled) - cpuplugd (daemon, so would require some work) - ipl_tools ipl_tools are basic tools used to specify which

Bug#499833: chccwdev cannot set device offline in Lenny

2010-01-25 Thread Frans Pop
Given that, what are the guidelines for when to file the initial bug report directly with upstream vs. when to file a bug report with Debian? It's mostly a question of what's most effective. The kernel team is already drowned in bug reports and has very little manpower to deal with relatively