Package: liferea
Version: 1.15.6-1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org
Usertag: s390x
Hi,
Today I was debugging the failing autopkgtest of liferea, a graphical
rss reader, on s390x [1]. Previously I already worked around another
crash
Hi all,
[s390x porters in CC, maybe they can help?]
On Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:22:54 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
Source: gnome-keyring
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in
testing [1]. Your
Dear s390x porters,
Recently I added isolation-machine [1] support to ci.debian.net on
amd64. At this moment, I think performance wise the only architecture
that qualifies in our infrastructure to add it too is s390x. However,
autopkgtest-build-qemu doesn't know what to do yet. Would any of
Hi Elizabeth,
On 18-04-2023 22:46, Elizabeth K. Joseph wrote:
I noticed that the Munin graphs are showing that the queue problems
from earlier this year seem to have been reduced now, is that correct,
or has the VM just not been restarted lately? It would be helpful to
have a starting point.
Hi,
On 28-02-2023 01:39, James Addison wrote:
Attempting to sum together what look, to me, like a pair of 2s:
* The s390x Debian CI queue size[1] is growing again.
Yes, but this time it's because some test seems to be misbehaving (only
on s390x or big endian or... ) and fills the disk
Hi,
On 21-02-2023 17:46, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
I am wondering whether we have downgraded the machines to 5.10.0-20
kernel to get rid of the kernel bug.
I think I mentioned it before, we downgraded indeed:
root@ci-worker-s390x-01:~# uname -a
Linux ci-worker-s390x-01 5.10.0-20-s390x #1 SMP Debian
Hi,
On 13-02-2023 15:59, Dipak Zope1 wrote:
There is some issue with 5.10.0-21 kernel and we are working on it. This
can cause performance impact on CI servers.
I have rebooted to the old kernel yesterday. That helps a bit indeed,
although most of the issues I reported predate that kernel
Hi Phil,
On 13-02-2023 08:57, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 12.02.23 22:38, Paul Gevers wrote:
I have munin [1], but as said, I'm not a trained sysadmin. I don't
know what I'm looking for if you ask "statistics on the network".
This is more of a software development / devops que
Hi Phil and all others offering help,
On 12-02-2023 20:32, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 11.02.23 18:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
* [suspect 1] network issues between the s390x and the main ci.d.n
server (the results (log files) of the autopkgtests are transferred to
the main server). Our ppc64el hosts
Dear all,
This is a call for help, mostly for s390x specifically and debugging our
s390x host,
ci.debian.net is the infrastructure that enables the Debian Release Team
to run autopkgtest as part of the quality assurance for
unstable-to-testing migration. Historically, that used to be
but had the other bug in
mind (in atop).
I am looking forward to have a fix for this for s390x.
Can you still look into the exempi issue in this bug report?
On 30/08/22, 12:44 AM, "Paul Gevers" wrote:
Hi Michael
On 29-08-2022 14:23, Michael Biebl wrote:
> As you are p
pak
*From: *Dipak Zope1
*Date: *Tuesday, 30 August 2022 at 3:28 PM
*To: *Paul Gevers , 1018...@bugs.debian.org
<1018...@bugs.debian.org>, debian-s390
*Subject: *[EXTERNAL] RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for
too long: FTBFS on s390x
Apologies for late response. It look
Hi Michael
On 29-08-2022 14:23, Michael Biebl wrote:
As you are probably aware, this issue is known and tracked in [1].
Which I added as a blocker and mentioned in my message, so yes.
The
package FTBFS after enabling the test suite. I raised this issue
upstream but there is no real
Hi,
On 13-08-2022 21:34, Marc Haber wrote:
running atop from unstable also hangs:
root@elbrus:~# atop
^C
on zelenka, running the atop binary just works fine. Installing atop
2.7.1-2 in a DD chroot on zelenka also works fine, and the binary is ok
as well. However, the chroots dont start the
Hi,
[tl;dr: atop seems to hang on s390x]
On 12-08-2022 12:23, Marc Haber wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:51:32PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 10-08-2022 12:03, Marc Haber wrote:
Unfortunately, this bug report suffers from multiple cut or
template error. The ci link points to the mercurial
Dear s390x porters,
As a Release Manager, I'm asking your help with the FTBFS of vkd3d on
s390x. The failure is blocking migration of the key package vkd3d.
Paul
On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 08:54:51 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing
Hi,
On 18-04-2022 21:38, Patrick Franz wrote:
this build failure is fixed in version 6.2.4+dfsg-4 of qt6-declarative
(https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=qt6-declarative=experimental).
Awesome. Sorry for not spotting that myself.
The package is currently in experimental, because
Hi all,
Today I stumbled upon some packages that failed to migrate to testing
because they switched their build dependency to qt6-declarative. It
seems to me that this package is relatively new and a replacement for
something we already had for a while. Apparently that built on s390x, so
Hi,
Results of autopkgtests in Debian packages are used to influence package
migration from unstable to testing. I recently started to expand the
amount of architectures that ci.debian.net is covering. We currently
have amd64, arm64, armhf, i386 and ppc64el. I have good hopes that we
can expand
Hi,
On 10-09-16 00:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - fpc not available on powerpc anymore (may have changed recently)
For whatever it is worth, this was finally fixed this week. It is
missing on mips*, ppc64el and s390x though, while at least some form of
MIPS is supported upstream.
Paul
20 matches
Mail list logo
