Kernel update for Debian 3.0/s390

2002-12-08 Thread Martin Schulze
An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/. For the first update to woody the 2.4 kernel patch should be updated. In order to install a new one, an old one has to be removed, so the archive doesn't explode and CDs are still buildable. Hence, I propose the following

Re: Kernel update for Debian 3.0/s390

2002-12-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:07, Martin Schulze wrote: An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/. For the first update to woody the 2.4 kernel patch should be updated. In order to install a new one, an old one has to be removed, so the archive doesn't explode and CDs are

Re: Kernel update for Debian 3.0/s390

2002-12-08 Thread Martin Schulze
Russell Coker wrote: On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:07, Martin Schulze wrote: An up-to-date version is at http://master.debian.org/~joey/3.0r1/. For the first update to woody the 2.4 kernel patch should be updated. In order to install a new one, an old one has to be removed, so the archive

Re: raptor

2002-12-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 18:37, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:17:53PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: It's missing bison, flex, and libpam0g-dev that I need and I guess that with those missing there are probably others as well... where so you need this packages? In the main root of

Re: raptor

2002-12-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 06:53:42PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: In the main root of raptor.debian.org. Or am I supposed to do all development in chroot's? the main root is a little bit problematic. i want to move the machine to a 64bit kernel. it needs new modutils and i don't want to rebuild

Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-08 Thread Russell Coker
OK, I'm getting exactly the same issues on S/390 (raptor) as I do on the ARM machines. Obviously I am doing something very wrong, could someone please tell me what it is? This list seems to get a faster response than debian-arm... Once I get this issue solved I'll have the entire user-space

Re: Fwd: -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS

2002-12-08 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:30:58PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote: [...] i try to compile the test program. first it isn't c, so i need to fix it. i compile it with gcc 3.2 and -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. it seems to work fine. | $ ./test ./test1 1000 | Seeking to 1000 | $ ls -al test1 |