Bastian Blank a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
>> proposals:
>> - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port.
>
> This is rather easy. I already did
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> It's not intended that multiarch supports switching architectures.
It's also just an upgrade. Or did I miss something that would make it
impossible to replace perl/i386 with perl/amd64?
Bastian
--
Many Myths are based on truth
On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two
proposal
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all
> > > library packages to i
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all
> > library packages to implement biarch semantic.
> ... which will be needed anyways. So your c
5 matches
Mail list logo