Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Bastian Blank a écrit : > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two >> proposals: >> - define a new sparc64 port, and bootstrap this one using the 32bit port. > > This is rather easy. I already did

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > It's not intended that multiarch supports switching architectures. It's also just an upgrade. Or did I miss something that would make it impossible to replace perl/i386 with perl/amd64? Bastian -- Many Myths are based on truth

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Matthias Klose
On 19.08.2009 16:33, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two proposal

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all > > > library packages to i

Re: Sparc release requalification

2009-08-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:09:44AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 04:33:32PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all > > library packages to implement biarch semantic. > ... which will be needed anyways. So your c