Re: upgrade-porter-chroots on zelenka

2012-05-20 Thread Faidon Liambotis
Hi, On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 03:48:29PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: I just ran upgrade-porter-chroots on zelenka and got this in sid_s390x: | Setting up texlive-base (2012.20120516-1) ... | mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVEMAIN... | mktexlsr: Updating

Re: Bug#673590: libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS on s390x: Failed 1/51 test programs. 0/2419 subtests failed.

2012-05-20 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:00:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: libxml-libxml-perl Version: 1.98+dfsg-1 Severity: important your package FTBFS on s390x, in the test suite: | Test Summary Report | --- | t/12html.t(Wstat: 256 Tests: 41 Failed:

Re: Bug#673590: libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS on s390x: Failed 1/51 test programs. 0/2419 subtests failed.

2012-05-20 Thread Niko Tyni
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 07:46:24PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 02:00:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Source: libxml-libxml-perl Version: 1.98+dfsg-1 Severity: important your package FTBFS on s390x, in the test suite:

Re: Bug#673590: libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS on s390x: Failed 1/51 test programs. 0/2419 subtests failed.

2012-05-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Niko, and thanks for the quick follow-up. Niko Tyni nt...@debian.org (20/05/2012): See the attached patch, which just makes 'len' an int and removes the problematic pointer cast. I wonder if the STRLEN cast on becomes an issue, though. Is it possible that an int doesn't fit into a size_t

Re: Bug#673590: libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS on s390x: Failed 1/51 test programs. 0/2419 subtests failed.

2012-05-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:22:58PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: you cannot reinterpret a size_t as an int. size_t might be unsigned, might have another length, etc. On 64bit big endian you fill the top bits and leave the lower ones untouched, because size_t is 64bit. So yeah, that code was

Re: Bug#673590: libxml-libxml-perl: FTBFS on s390x: Failed 1/51 test programs. 0/2419 subtests failed.

2012-05-20 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:37:00PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:22:58PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: you cannot reinterpret a size_t as an int. size_t might be unsigned, might have another length, etc. On 64bit big endian you fill the top bits and leave the lower