Here are some test results for various linux ports, ran on Debian unstable:
builds logs (except for mips) can be found at:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libffi&suite=experimental
i386 and amd64 look ok.
arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi:
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O3 execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -Os execution test
XPASS: libffi.call/cls_longdouble.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
Running
/build/buildd-libffi_3.0.10~rc8-1-armel-3UaGFl/libffi-3.0.10~rc8/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp
...
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1639
# of unexpected successes 5
# of unsupported tests 15
ia64:
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
kfreebsd-amd64:
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
kfreebsd-i386:
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
powerpc:
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
s390:
Running
/build/buildd-libffi_3.0.10~rc8-1-s390-mB6C2g/libffi-3.0.10~rc8/testsuite/libffi.call/call.exp
...
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O0 -W -Wall execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O3 execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -Os execution test
FAIL: libffi.call/err_bad_abi.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer execution test
Running
/build/buildd-libffi_3.0.10~rc8-1-s390-mB6C2g/libffi-3.0.10~rc8/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp
...
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1639
# of unexpected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 15
sparc:
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
mips (mipsel should be the same):
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1644
# of unsupported tests 15
however some test fail for mips64 and the new abi:
with -mabi=64:
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test,
is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern
test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
Running /home/doko/tmp/libffi-3.0.10~rc8/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp
...
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1634
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unsupported tests 15
with -mabi=n32:
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O0 -W -Wall (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O3 output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O3 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O3 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -Os output pattern test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test,
is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_longdouble_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern
test, is 0.0
res: 4
7.0
res: 4
, should match 7.0^M?
res: 4^M?
7.0^M?
res: 4
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: libffi.call/cls_pointer_stack.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
Running /home/doko/tmp/libffi-3.0.10~rc8/testsuite/libffi.special/special.exp
...
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes 1624
# of unexpected failures 20
# of unsupported tests 15
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db2f583.1070...@ubuntu.com
