On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 10:20:50AM +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> in addition, arm64 is usually speculative OoO (Cavium ThunderX V1
> being a notable exception) which means it's vulnerable to spectre and
> meltdown attacks, whereas 32-bit ARM is exclusively in-order. if you
> want
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 04:11:32PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Well, we just did a full archive rebuild of "ppc64" to be able to
> support ppc64 on the e5500 cores by disabling AltiVec, didn't we?
Well it is getting there.
--
Len Sorensen
On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 08:35:02PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Do they implement the ISA required by the existing Debian port?
Yes.
The only ones that don't are the Freescale 85xx and P10[12]x chips,
which are powerpcspe due to using the e500 core.
All the 83xx and 82xx chips which are still
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:38:29AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Here is a little status update on the mails we have received so far.
First off, thanks to all the porters who have already replied!
So far, the *no one* has stepped up to back the following architectures:
hurd-i386
ia64
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 06:59:28PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
I'm one of the maintainers of the Debian package of monotone; I'm also
one of its upstream developers. For the new 0.36-1 package presently
in unstable, we decided to run the program's testsuite during the
build. This found
On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 10:18:15PM +0200, Shimon Lebowitz wrote:
Hi,
I ran the base install of Debian using
NFS. The CD image was mounted on my PC
(on a virtual CDROM generated by Daemon-tools).
What is Daemon-tools and is this machine running Windows or some kind of
unix?
After the
6 matches
Mail list logo
