which is essentially
a virtual machine running under PR/SM. And the physical machine behind
those (at least) two levels of virtualization doesn't really have the
same hardware architecture as a virtual machine, such as physical chpids
vs. logical chpids and logical channel subsystems, etc., define
off
older hardware. We still run z/VM 5.4.0 because it is the last
release of z/VM that still supports our z/890. Starting with
z/VM 6.1.0, a z10 or newer is required.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
-
tainting kernel
The kernel does boot; but the kernel gets tainted, which disables lock
debugging.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@fastmail.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
is superfluous. It is no longer needed. It should be dropped from the package.
That's one less piece of code to maintain, and one less item that needs to be
included in the initial RAM file system image file.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
n of the s390x hardware which
causes configuration of the above package to fail. I downloaded Hercules
3.11 directly from upstream, compiled it from source, and installed it.
The above error disappears under Hercules 3.11. The bottom line:
We really need a new hercules package for Debian!
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:15:16 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 05:12:30PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> No. The hook script was written by me years ago, and I put it in the
>> bug report, but it was never incorporated into the official pack
On Sat, 05 Sep 2015 13:40:27 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> What is the canonical place to get new Hercules releases from?
> It's neither http://www.hercules-390.org nor
> https://github.com/hercules-390/hyperion
http://www.hercules-390.eu
--
.''`. Stephen Powel
nning grub2 from a kernel image booted by zipl and then
> kexec()ing into the right kernel and initrd is a bit too much, though.
I agree.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
E pass
> (dead store elimination). I'm currently auto-reducing the testcase
> to start debugging. I'll open a GCC BZ with the reduced testcase.
You beat me to it. Thanks, Andreas
--
.''`. Stephen Powell<zlinux...@wowway.com>
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
release is 3.11, released
on September 15, 2014. 3.07 was released on March 10, 2010.
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
=a313bdc5310dd807655d3ca3eb2219cd65dfe45a
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
a better way.
Regards,
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
for a kernel
to boot. I suggest leaving LOADPARM blank. But since you are
running Debian under Hercules, you might find the following web page
useful:
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/hercules.htm
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
machine
language and pseudo-assembly language for the problem piece of code,
both for the good case and the failing case, and send me a link to it,
I'll take a look at it. I can't promise you success, but I'll look at it.
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
, not dash) may tighten up standards
and the code will fail. I have attached a patch file which corrects the
problems.
Note: the portion of the patch which changes chandev-convert affects only
the source package. It is not included in the binary package.
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux
that Debian supports.
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
the mailing
list archives at
https://lists.debian.org/debian-s390/
or by some other means, to verify that your post was received and posted to the
list.
--
.''`. Stephen Powellzlinux...@wowway.com
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:12:24 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
The full PSW is as follows:
0002 8000 32EE
By the way, Hercules has an instruction tracing facility, similar to
the CP TRACE command on z/VM. The T command, along with the T+
and T- commands
to the
zipl menu being written out. The system is unbootable. This may
be related to the general brokenness of C on s390x in jessie/sid.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
over it.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/1925263645.331324.1408067153733.javamail.r...@md01
apt-get --purge dist-upgrade
apt-get clean
apt-get --purge autoremove
aptitude forget-new
aptitude keep-all
I hope this helps someone.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
https://lists.debian.org/1270242434.431488.1404389237787.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 21:24:43 -0500 (EST), Philipp Kern wrote:
Is znetconf solely doing runtime configuration or does it also try to persist
it?
From what I can tell, it appears to be doing runtime configuration only.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
to be a single, well-defined place to document it.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
to obtain free help works out for you.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
. Philipp, are you
listening?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/370643734.1024081.1392783799335
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 15:19:13 -0500 (EST), David Clements wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
...
The standard Debian package for
Hercules, 3.07, does not support an Open Systems Adapter Express in QDIO
mode, so that's the end of that.
I've never tried to use znetconf. For that matter, I've never
/usr/share/man/man8/lsqeth.8.gz
By the way, I'd be interested to hear your opinion of my Debian Under Hercules
web page at http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/hercules.htm .
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/850197581.2709701.1376871595168.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
or negative, is welcome.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/394932986.2159874.1373830809192.javamail.r
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:56:29 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:31:25 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote:
Maybe you could check out the debian-installer manual from SVN and create a
patch? I'd be happy to commit it.
I'll be happy to do that if you will grant me
On Sat, 29 Jun 2013 15:37:42 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
As you know, the installation procedure for Debian on the s390 and s390x
architectures involves using the Integrated System Console (or the virtual
3215 console in a virtual machine under z/VM) to get the network device
the
initial
RAM file system is re-built for other reasons. A machine-readable copy of this
script can be found on my web site at
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/zipl/runzipl
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ
it will be addressed eventually. Philip may wish to
elaborate. I do not speak for the port team.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
from the hybrid environment to a full s390x environment,
but you really have to know what you're doing, and it's unsupported.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
architecture, where both kernel space and user space are 64 bit.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
at. They haven't been fixed, but the bug reports
show how to fix them.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?dist=unstable;package=sysconfig-hardware
You might also find some of my web pages available on my web site
useful:
http://users.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/index.htm
--
.''`. Stephen
system is configured properly.)
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1211379467.720245.1351285938171
release and
enables security support by default when installing the testing release.
I have always enabled it, and it works fine for i386 and s390, but not
for s390x. Thanks for filing the bug report.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/updates main contrib non-free
A search of the internet using the above error messages produced no
useful hits.
Why is there no security support?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
. This is
little-endian format. Sometimes hidden assumptions of little-
endian format creep into programs that cause them to not work
properly on s390x.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
to include DECNET support in the kernel by default
should probably be posted to the debian-kernel list.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Please reply to the list, not to me personally. Placing my reply
on the list.
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 09:20:47 -0400 (EDT), Sampsa Laine wrote:
On 5 Aug 2012, at 16:09, Stephen Powell wrote:
First of all, are you running Debian or Ubuntu? This is a Debian list.
Advice you get here is going
.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1180210863.262657.1344192985512.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
using the correct network device in the correct mode?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
(in copy) is a fan of Debian (on PC) and
has tried to help, to no avail.
Is there a simple solution to get the s90x packages in our configuration?
Yes. See my comments above.
Thanks regards,
Christian Jean-Claude
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
me how to install it on LPAR.
Regards
Shahanawaz
I have never installed Debian in an LPAR. I have always used a virtual machine
under z/VM. But it looks like Philipp Kern has already answered you.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
.
Yet the Debian package continues to use release 2.3. The package
maintainer is aware of this, or should be, but I've seen no
progress as of yet. Perhaps your influence might help.
Respectfully yours,
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On Thu, 12 May 2011 19:22:53 -0400 (EDT), Christian Boitet wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
...
No, that's not right. Did you try an unmodified file,
as I suggested? Here is the unmodified PARMFILE DEBIAN
file, in hexadecimal ASCII. For readability, I have added a blank
between each group
you that Debian is not a supported
environment and hang up. And then what good is the support that you're
paying for?
I love Debian for s390, but if I were going to use it I would want to use
it in an all-open-source environment.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
products, as well as about 25,000 others, are already packaged for
Debian.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
(X'00' in either code) after the terminator out to
80 bytes. (Use SET NULLS ON in XEDIT.) I would issue
SET VERIFY OFF H 1 80
in XEDIT just prior to the FILE command to verify the trailing linefeed
and trailing nulls.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
than 2G of real memory, since the kernel
can allocate (in theory) up to a 2G address space to EACH user-space process.
HTH
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:16:13 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
I will explain the installation steps in detail.
Maybe there's something you're missing.
...
One more thing I forgot to mention. I'm not sure if the kernel boot messages
are written to the virtual 3215 console or if they're
to be issued during shutdown
when a halt or power-off signal is received. But this only works if
the vmcp kernel module is loaded. I list vmcp in /etc/modules to accomplish
this.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
a new one to be generated at the next boot up, but it may
or may not be what the user wants. This is particularly the case when
the system has more than one network adapter.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ
-package is a good idea when you are having upgrade
problems. Sometimes, someone else has had the same problem already.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
installation:
I am not a package maintainer for s390-tools; I am a user who is an interested
party to this bug report. This bug is related to bug number 599931, and the
hook script templates provided in the body of bug report 599931 will fix both
that problem and this one.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
of an error from zipl, which is desirable during a remove.)
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
...@lists.debian.org).
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/273996600.388799.1285853849788.javamail.r
the method described.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/104733069.25464.1284645808599.javamail.r...@md01
system; so I never had to
deal with your situation. I'm afraid I have no experience in that
particular aspect of your installation problem. Good luck.
Please report back if you are successful, with details of what you
did and how you did it, and a list of pitfalls to avoid.
--
.''`. Stephen
to implement the dasd diag driver, which I recommend for anyone
running Debian in a virtual machine under z/VM. For more detailed installation
instructions, see the Installation Guide at
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.s390/index.html
This should get you started.
--
.''`. Stephen
.)
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.s390/index.html
See section 5.2, boot parameters.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 06:33:42 -0400 (EDT), Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
Never mind, we've managed to test this in an emulator already.
Sorry for the slow response.
No problem, I know how it is. I didn't mean to sound bitter, just wanted
to prevent
interests to do so; but I am not in a position to offer a porter
box to Debian. It doesn't belong to me. I run Debian for s390
in a virtual machine under z/VM; so if there's anything VM-specific
that needs tested, I might be able to help.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
are now well aware of the problem, and you can decide
what you want to do about it. And I have a circumvention which I
will publish on my kernel building web site for anyone else who may
wish to implement my solution until an official solution is available.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:20:20 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 09:50 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
[...]
Personally, I think that the requirement to maintain symlinks, if used,
is implicit in the purpose of the boot loader hook script.
[...]
After thinking about
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 18:48:57 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 15:04 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
Ben,
I could use your help on bug number 594127. Am I not understanding
the policy? Please read the bug log and advise. Thanks.
Assuming that s390 kernels normally
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:25:02 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:50:47AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
[...]
Personally, I think that the requirement to maintain symlinks, if used,
is implicit in the purpose of the boot loader hook script.
[...]
No, that means
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:02:13 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
The alternative, obviously, is a separate hook script to maintain symlinks.
That immediately raises two more questions: (1) How do we make sure that
it executes *after* the initramfs hook and *before* the boot loader hook, and
(2
for release.
The previous post shows that a *must* directive is being violated.
Therefore, setting severity to serious.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:32:36 -0400 (EDT), Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 05:17:31PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
(1) the hook scripts provided,
/etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-zipl and /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-zipl,
do not maintain the symbolic links. The zipl boot loader typically
/~zlinuxman/initramfs/post-update.d/bootloader
(for installation in /etc/initramfs/post-update.d)
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
/postrm.d/zz-bootloader
initramfs hook:
http://www.wowway.com/~zlinuxman/initramfs/post-update.d/bootloader
If they are of any use to you, help yourself.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
running
on a z/890 (2086).
What kind of workarounds do you need? Have you even tried to install yet?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
* set
to no.
6. The installer must not define do_bootloader, postinst_hook or
postrm_hook in /etc/kernel-img.conf.
Doesn't this conflict with point 4 (a)?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
, 2010 at 11:16:58AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
Currently, hook scripts invoked by a stock kernel maintainer script
or a maintainer script from a kernel image package created by make-kpkg
pass these exact same arguments.
no.
From a Squeeze system running a custom kernel created by make-kpkg
with the question of how to transition from the current
mess.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org
in all cases.
Sounds reasonable to me. This is for Squeeze+1, right?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http
On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:45:58 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 20:35 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
Sounds reasonable to me. This is for Squeeze+1, right?
No, we need something like this for squeeze.
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:51:11 +0200, Maximilian Attems wrote:
On Fri
.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
: :' :
`. `'`
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/765636083.229248.1277306459777.javamail.r...@md01.wow.synacor.com
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:25:45 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 09:43 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
do_bootloader = yes
in /etc/kernel-img.conf means run the historic boot loader for this
platform.
For the i386 platform (and amd64) the historic boot loader is lilo
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:11:04 -0400 (EDT), Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 12:33:58PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
[...]
I can maybe accept your proposal for Squeeze. But for Lenny, I believe
that the maintainer scripts should be changed back they way they
were. In other words
should be restored in an update to lenny.
Great! What about Squeeze? It still supports creating the initial RAM
file system and updating symlinks via variables in /etc/kernel-img.conf.
Doesn't it make sense to allow the historical boot loader code to work
as well?
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
consider the source.)
See bug number 573887 for a build problem that surfaced with the mozart
package that resulted from this kernel change. Whether that's your
problem or not, I have no idea. As for the other architectures, I
have no idea about them either.
--
.''`. Stephen Powell
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 11:03:01 -0400 (EDT), Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Stephen Powell wrote:
The only thing I know of that changed recently is the switch
to a 64-bit kernel by the build server for s390. (I am just a regular
Joe Schmoe user. I'm not a Debian package maintainer, Debian Developer
I finally found the cause of this pesky bug!
At some point, an aptitude full-upgrade seemed to fix this problem.
But not always.
The problem is that I could never come up with a consistent failure
scenario. Well, today, I finally did. It turns out
that, for me, the failure only occurs when
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:53:47 -0500 (EST), Frans Pop wrote:
They are not mystery files at all. They are part of sysconfig-hardware and
their exact purpose is to bring up devices during system boot!
I'm sure that they are no mystery to you, but they *were* a mystery
to me until you explained
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:13:01 -0500 (EST), Frans Pop wrote:
I've taken over the daily builds of Debian Installer for s390 as lophos has
been down for well over a month now.
If the service on lophos is ever reinstated, or if someone wants to set up
(and manage) the builds on a regular buildd
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:11:37 -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010, at 1:55 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
But you remind me for something: I wanted to raise the minimum CPU
requirement to z900.
Er, why?
There are a number of shops out there still stuck running 31-bit
processors (albeit,
Please excuse me for butting in here, gentlemen, but I'd like to say
a few words, if I may.
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 04:36:22 -0500, Frans Pop wrote:
- vmur (was enabled, but files were not included in the deb)
Obviously, per Device Drivers, Features, and Commands, downloadable
from
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 11:50:45 -0500, Ian Corbett wrote:
If instead you click on the link for the lenny page, and the the s390
link under other images there it will take you to this page.
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/lenny/main/installer-s390/current/images/
These images have not
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:39:31 -0500, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to port the new version of Atlas on all Debian architectures
[1].
I am starting to try to fix s390 which is one of the non-supported archs
of Atlas and I need your help to translate some x86 asm to s390.
Atlas
On 2010-01-25 at 05:58:04 +0100, Franz Pop wrote:
If there still is an issue affecting current kernels, you will probably get
much more response reporting it to the upstream kernel developers than
with a Debian bug report.
I'm just trying to follow the rules.
From
I am cross-posting this on both debian-s390 and debian-boot,
since I'm not really sure which list it belongs on. Those of
you who are subscribed to both lists, please excuse the duplicate
e-mails.
The daily build development Debian installer images
for the s390 architecture are on a server
Hello to all. I just subscribed to this bug report.
I can confirm this on my system as well, both for a 31-bit and
a 64-bit server. mawk is installed as part of standard system
but gawk is not. And lsdasd does not not work with mawk.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 2010-01-11 at 08:00:18 -0500, Larry D Martin wrote:
Update: With no other changes Suse 10.1 recognizes the disk.
What is the difference in the install processes - as it relates to disk
discovery?
Thanks, ..Larry
As requested previously, (1) please don't top post but use the
On 2010-01-04 at 14:52:19 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 10:26:38AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
Hello upstream kernel team!
A fix was recently published for drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c to fix a
problem
with an inability to get read-only minidisks online to Linux via
I'm on web page
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
I click on the s390 link under other images, which is a link to
http://lophos.multibuild.org/d-i/images/daily/
and I get the following error in my browser (eventually, after a timeout):
Unable to load page
Problem occurred
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
