On 08/03/2019 10:07, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Control: block -1 by 923694
>
> On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> meta-gnome3
Control: block -1 by 923694
On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something
Hi,
Simon McVittie (2019-03-02):
> On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is
> > > > not
> > > > the full GNOME 3
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify
> > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is not
> > > the full GNOME 3 desktop used on other architectures, for example
> > >
Hi,
On 05/02/2019 11:16, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Please could we have a decision on this in plenty of time before the freeze?
> Given the upstream GC improvements aimed at mitigating or solving "the memory
> leak problem" in gjs 1.54.x, I am not comfortable with releasing buster with
> gjs 1.52.x
Please could we have a decision on this in plenty of time before the freeze?
Given the upstream GC improvements aimed at mitigating or solving "the memory
leak problem" in gjs 1.54.x, I am not comfortable with releasing buster with
gjs 1.52.x (which has a backport of those changes done by a
Hi Cyril,
On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
>>> on
>>> gnome, which is removed
On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 10:30 AM John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> time for trying to whip up a patch.
I don't see any value in delaying any longer. It's pretty easy to let
gjs/s390x back in; removing it has been quite
On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 12:01 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:29:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> > time for trying to whip up a patch.
>
> That seems fine, but please note that most
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:29:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough
> time for trying to whip up a patch.
That seems fine, but please note that most of the changes necessary to
remove gjs from s390x happened some time
Hi!
On 12/17/18 4:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> We might have a patch for s390x in openSUSE/SLE, I'll have a look. There
>> also might be one in Fedora we could pick for Debian.
>>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1488552 is what I was
> hitting last time around. That got
On 12/17/18 4:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/17/18 3:56 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> gjs recently switched from mozjs52 to mozjs60, and mozjs60 doesn't work
>> on s390x (#909536; about 80% of its tests fail, which means I have no
>> confidence that the resulting binaries would be
On 12/17/18 3:56 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> gjs recently switched from mozjs52 to mozjs60, and mozjs60 doesn't work
> on s390x (#909536; about 80% of its tests fail, which means I have no
> confidence that the resulting binaries would be useful or usable if
> we ignored the test failures).
This
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends
> > on
> > gnome, which is removed from s390x. I'm not comfortable breaking that, you'd
> >
14 matches
Mail list logo
