Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-09-01 Thread Michael Holzheu
Hello Stephen, On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:38:58 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: [snip] I do worry, though, about this being a more general problem. What about the interrupt handler in the Linux kernel? Or any other portion of the kernel that needs to examine (or

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-25 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 10:52:47AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 20:43:30 +0200 Bastian Blank wa...@debian.org wrote: And -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks seems to be the correct option. From the gcc man page: -fdelete-null-pointer-checks In some environments, this

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-24 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:21:31PM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: static inline int wait(void) { do { load_wait_psw(0x010200018000ULL, S390_lowcore.external_new_psw); 33d0: e3 20 d0 00 00 04 lg %r2,0(%r13) 33d6: a7 39 01 b0

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-22 Thread Michael Holzheu
On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: Here are the last few instructions prior to the failure on the failing version, thanks to the CP TRACE facility under z/VM on a real IBM z/890: 2A78 STG E310F0A80024 FEB0

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-16 Thread Stephen Powell
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 19:12:24 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote: The full PSW is as follows: 0002 8000 32EE By the way, Hercules has an instruction tracing facility, similar to the CP TRACE command on z/VM. The T command, along with the T+ and T- commands, are

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-15 Thread Michael Holzheu
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:32:42 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote: Hrm. Odd. It shouldn't be because the brokeness relates to the C library, not to the C compiler itself and zipl does not use the C library.

Re: Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-15 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:46:54AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 21:45:53 -0400 (EDT) Stephen Powell zlinux...@wowway.com wrote: On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:32:42 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote: Hrm. Odd. It shouldn't be because the brokeness relates to the C library,

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-14 Thread Stephen Powell
Package: s390-tools Version: 1.24.1-1 Severity: critical Justification: The entire system is unbootable After installing s390-tools version 1.24.1-1 and re-running zipl, a reboot of the system causes a disabled wait PSW to be loaded during boot, with a wait state code of X'32EE', prior to the

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-14 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 06:49:20AM -0400, Stephen Powell wrote: Justification: The entire system is unbootable After installing s390-tools version 1.24.1-1 and re-running zipl, a reboot of the system causes a disabled wait PSW to be loaded during boot, with a wait state code of X'32EE',

Bug#758115: Disabled wait state X'32EE' on IPL of zIPL

2014-08-14 Thread Stephen Powell
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 10:32:42 -0400 (EDT), Philipp Kern wrote: Hrm. Odd. It shouldn't be because the brokeness relates to the C library, not to the C compiler itself and zipl does not use the C library. Again, we must distinguish between zipl, the Linux command which runs at a Linux shell