Re: Bug#878285, #878286: mozjs52: FTBFS on powerpc, s390x, powerpc64: test failures

2017-10-12 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 at 01:31:08 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > powerpc64 (pizzetti) gets the same test failures as s390x (zelenka), > suggesting that they are something that happens on big-endian 64-bit. > hppa doesn't seem to have a porterbox and sparc64's (notker) was > unresponsive

Bug#909536: mozjs60: FTBFS on s390x: around 80% of tests crash

2018-09-24 Thread Simon McVittie
Source: mozjs60 Version: 60.2.1-1 Severity: serious Tags: ftbfs help X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org User: debian-s390@lists.debian.org Usertags: s390x Most of the test cases provided with mozjs60 crash: grep '^TEST-' s390x.log | cut -d' ' -f1 | sort | uniq -c 1714 TEST-KNOWN-FAIL

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2018-12-17 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 at 17:00:21 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 13/12/2018 16:58, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > task-pkgs-are-installable-faux depends on task-gnome-desktop, which depends > > on > > gnome, which is removed from s390x. I'm not comfortable breaking that, you'd > >

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2018-12-24 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 at 16:29:31 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Can we postpone the decision until after the holidays? Then I have enough > time for trying to whip up a patch. That seems fine, but please note that most of the changes necessary to remove gjs from s390x happened some time

Re: gnome-core: does not actually install a desktop environment on s390x

2019-03-23 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 at 03:49:32 +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > An additional option here which I'd like to propose would be to stop > mucking around with dependencies to try to hide problems on those > architectures. Instead "simply" do arch-specific removal of the broken > packages, including

Bug#923524: installation-reports: buster on s390x qemu: ssh key generation hangs; repeated message "BUG: non-zero pgtables_bytes on freeing mm: -16384"

2019-03-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal I tried to install Debian s390x on a qemu VM using command lines based on . A stretch installation hasn't finished yet but appears to be heading for success, using this command-line:

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2019-03-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gnome-core installs something that is not > > > the full GNOME 3 desktop used on other

Bug#924548: gnome-core: does not actually install a desktop environment on s390x

2019-03-14 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: gnome-core Version: 1:3.30+1 Severity: serious Justification: we should make a decision one way or another before release I recently changed gnome-core to install gnome-flashback instead of GNOME Shell on s390x, because: GNOME Shell is uninstallable on s390x, due to mozjs60 not being

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2019-03-08 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: block -1 by 923694 On Sat, 02 Mar 2019 at 22:21:31 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 05 Feb 2019 at 10:16:56 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > > * Require task-gnome-desktop to be installable on s390x, but modify > > > > meta-gnome3 so that on s390x, gn

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2019-02-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Fri, 08 Feb 2019 at 16:48:52 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm not sure how to hide a particular entry on a particular arch; I'm > not a tasksel expert and won't be one in the next 5 minutes. But it > seems to me the immediate concern was about the default desktop anyway, > which shouldn't be

Re: Bug#906016: transition: gjs built with mozjs60

2019-02-05 Thread Simon McVittie
anges done by a developer who does not have in-depth knowledge of gjs, namely me); so I would like to ask for a freeze exception to complete this transition. On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 10:25:01 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 17/12/2018 15:56, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The options I can see are

Re: Bug#909536: mozjs60: FTBFS on s390x: around 80% of tests crash

2019-02-05 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 21:18:47 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Most of the test cases provided with mozjs60 crash: > > grep '^TEST-' s390x.log | cut -d' ' -f1 | sort | uniq -c >1714 TEST-KNOWN-FAIL >6923 TEST-PASS > 28635 TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL This seems to be endiann

Bug#927081: gnome-shell: FTBFS on s390x: crash in throw_property_lookup_error()

2019-04-14 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: libmozjs-60-dev Version: 60.2.3-3 Severity: important Tags: help Control: affects -1 src:gnome-shell src:gjs X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-s390@lists.debian.org mozjs60 and gjs now pass most of their tests on s390x, but there seems to be some problem when gjs' debug output prints the JS::HandleId