On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Steve McIntyre wrote:
The first thing I promised to do when I became DPL was to initiate a
thorough review of Debian's teams. Well, no time like the present!
I just answered your mail to Debian Med team. For the record and
readers of CDD list it is archived here:
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
There is still the pkg-science group under Alioth which aims to do that
too. If you want, I can give you the admin rights.
Ahh, that's probably a good idea. Well, we probably do not need two
competing VCS. It would be great if you could add me to
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-05-06 08:11:47) :
as I said in my last posting about libblitz++ I would like to team
maintain libblitz++. I also wonder whether the WordNet package I
now maintain on my own for about 10 years should be moved to a common
repository and had
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Frederic Lehobey wrote:
There is a virtual package provided by octave2.1, octave2.9, octave3.0:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/octave
Sorry, I missed that.
Recommends: octave | octave3.0
Definitely (just commited)
to recover the above effect (if I am not wrong).
Hi
I agree. Is it not the same idea as the pkg-science team started by
Sylvestre Ledru (package there what is not more suitable somewhere
else like in DebiChem, pkg-scicomp, Debian Med, etc.)?
I would suggest pkg-scicomp which seems more suite for the task.
Best regards
C.
--
To
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Christophe Prud'homme wrote:
I agree. Is it not the same idea as the pkg-science team started by
Sylvestre Ledru (package there what is not more suitable somewhere
else like in DebiChem, pkg-scicomp, Debian Med, etc.)?
I would suggest pkg-scicomp which seems more suite
Honestly, I don't mind about the name of the repro and pkg-scicomp
seems to have gathered much more stuff then pkg-science. So what about
moving the three packages from pkg-science to pkg-scicomp close
pkg-science and turn pkg-scicomp into a more structured repository
featuring a policy as
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
The only problem with this solution is the name
pkg-scicomp (scientific computing) which is too specific.
Many software won't fit into this title.
Well, I perfectly understand your intend but finally I don't care
about a name but about work getting
Hi,
David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-05-06 11:23:34) :
Speaking as the maintainer of all packages in pkg-science ( all 3 :-)
), I don't mind any sort of merging plan. But I understood from
previous mails from C. Prudhomme that he (and others?) preferred to
keep pkg-scicomp a more
On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
Speaking as the maintainer of all packages in pkg-science ( all 3 :-)
), I don't mind any sort of merging plan.
That's good. ;-)
But I understood from
previous mails from C. Prudhomme that he (and others?) preferred to
keep pkg-scicomp a more
Hi Andreas,
Wow, small world! I have been very interested in WordNet for years
and in fact it has been a major (but relatively unpublished) and
recurring interest in my own personal computational linguistics
research. I have made first the popular poetry generation programs
using wordnet, and
On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 11:31 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Tue, 6 May 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
The only problem with this solution is the name
pkg-scicomp (scientific computing) which is too specific.
Many software won't fit into this title.
Well, I perfectly understand your intend
(reposted from debian-devel, since debian-science is more precisely my
target audience for this message)
I've been working on packaging for Debian SAGE (http://sagemath.org), a
large free mathematics software conglomeration that is competing with
proprietary mathematical software systems such
Teemu Ikonen writes (Re: Bug#426581: meshlab - anyone still working on this):
The package has not been updated to 1.1.1, and I may not have time to
do it very soon. Ian did promise to sponsor the package, but I haven't
heard anything from him lately.
I do exist but don't let me stop anyone
Hello,
On Tue, 06 May 2008, Timothy G Abbott wrote:
I've been working on packaging for Debian SAGE (http://sagemath.org), a
large free mathematics software conglomeration that is competing with
proprietary mathematical software systems such as Mathematica, Matlab,
Maple, and Magma
On Wed, 7 May 2008, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
The primary problem that makes my packages
potentially unsuitable for uploading to Debian now is many of them may
violate Debian library policy:
Last time I looked at the problem of packaging SAGE, there was one
other issue.
SAGE required
16 matches
Mail list logo
