Difference between Debian Scientfic Computing Packages and Debian Science?

2009-01-28 Thread Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
At any rate, which one do I need to join to upload an updated cimg-dev version without NMUing? - Jordi G. H> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Debian Science Policy

2009-01-28 Thread Don Armstrong
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 27.01.2009, 11:26 -0800 schrieb Don Armstrong: > > Since it wasn't discussed on -policy or -project or -science, it > > quite clearly has domain relevance only for the debian-science > > alioth project.[1] > > This might be clear for al

Re: Debian Science Policy (was: adding mpich to pkg-scicomp)

2009-01-28 Thread Morten Kjeldgaard
On 26/01/2009, at 18.50, Daniel Leidert wrote: Stop announcing your very own and personal packaging policy as the "Debian Science Policy". I'm not amused and some kind of pissed off. It is sad to hear that a mailing list posting can piss you off and upset you. It reveals that you have a pr

Re: R packages in Debian Science (Was: ITP: r-cran-colorspace -- GNU R Color Space Manipulation)

2009-01-28 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Ross Boylan wrote: I haven't been following closely enough to know the purpose, but potentially every R package is (or could be imagined to be) is statistical. Sure. But for instance I'm rather busy packaging r-surveillance and other R tools for use in epidemiology. Thes