Re: Change InsightToolkit to use Review/Statistics?

2010-12-13 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:16:46AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Steve, > > Cool to see you are working on packaging elastix. We were referred to > it, and good old mairix lead me right to your email (on 2nd hit, since > first one was to recap this exact question of ITK_USE_REVIEW). > >

Re: Change InsightToolkit to use Review/Statistics?

2010-12-13 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
Hi Steve, Cool to see you are working on packaging elastix. We were referred to it, and good old mairix lead me right to your email (on 2nd hit, since first one was to recap this exact question of ITK_USE_REVIEW). Meanwhile I am adding it to debian-med imaging taskpage (it should appear upon nex

Re: Performance analysis and profiling tools for sequential and parallel codes

2010-12-13 Thread Manuel Prinz
Am Montag, den 13.12.2010, 12:24 +0100 schrieb Sylvestre Ledru: > [Putting packages under the Debian Science umbrella] would also > simplify some coordinations on some related works (MPI, linear algebra > libraries, etc). It is one of the reason of the pkg-scicomp => Debian > Science merge. FWIW,

RFP: cdf -- NASA Common Data Format library and tools

2010-12-13 Thread Teemu Ikonen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name: cdf Version : 3.3.0 Upstream Author : Space Physics Data Facility * URL : http://cdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/ * License : http://cdf.gsfc.nasa.gov/html/CDF_copyright.html (See also http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/20

Re: Performance analysis and profiling tools for sequential and parallel codes

2010-12-13 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Bonjour Julien, On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 17:43 +0100, Julien BLACHE wrote: > Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > Hi, > > > As Lucas suggested, we can work to put them under the Debian Science > > umbrella. > > My preference goes to forming a dedicated team, due to the very complex > nature of these tools