Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:57:49PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: Hi, there's one thing that I don't have understood clearly about the dates to freeze and the procedure. On November 5th at 23:59 UTC begin the freeze period. The page [1] mention that: So ensure your package is

Re: Adopt python-sympy

2014-10-27 Thread Sergey Kirpichev
Hello, On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com wrote: I have upload permissions for this package (thanks to Georges), but I would like to keep him in Uploaders, if sometimes he can do at least some review work. bad new, I can't do upload (probably, due to

Python-scoop for Debian Science

2014-10-27 Thread Daniel Stender
Hi, I've prepared a new package of Scoop (Python environment for parallel programming) [1] for Debian Science (thanks to F.-E. Picca for sponsoring). Haven't done that before, do I as the package maintainer have to add the package to the task (distributedcomputing)? Is there a consensus towards

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net writes: So, one thing it that the package has important bugs and we are not able to solve it in time, so this package will not be in Jessie. But, are you telling me that the package won't be in Jessie because 6 hours after all the steps that I

Re: Python-scoop for Debian Science

2014-10-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Daniel, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:30:55PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: I've prepared a new package of Scoop (Python environment for parallel programming) [1] for Debian Science (thanks to F.-E. Picca for sponsoring). Haven't done that before, do I as the package maintainer have to add

RE:Python-scoop for Debian Science

2014-10-27 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
Hello All BTW, there is no point in making the package priority extra. Debian Science policy recommends optional (for very good reasons). I always miss this point, thanks Andreas for this reminder. Cheers Frederic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 27 d'octubre de 2014, a les 10:57:31, Aaron M. Ucko va escriure: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda l...@alaxarxa.net writes: So, one thing it that the package has important bugs and we are not able to solve it in time, so this package will not be in Jessie. But, are you telling me

Re: Python-scoop for Debian Science

2014-10-27 Thread Daniel Stender
Thanks for adding the package to the task, Depends is fine. I'll recheck the priority. Greetings, Daniel On 27.10.2014 21:04, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi Daniel, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:30:55PM +0100, Daniel Stender wrote: I've prepared a new package of Scoop (Python environment for

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Tobias Hansen
On 10/28/2014 12:12 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: ok, thanks. I will wait November 5th to see what happens and after I will see. Really, for a non debian-developer or maintainer is quite frustrating this situation. Best regards, Leopold If the updated package is in

Debian: apertium language pairs broken in jessie due to pcre3 update

2014-10-27 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, 2014-08-13 at 09:29 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: I don't think a proper fix is going to happen before the freeze so can we have the binNMUs so that apertium works in jessie? So it is now too late to easily fix this issue for jessie. In addition some language pairs got removed due to RC bugs