Re: flatbuffers - epic author list

2016-04-24 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, On 24/04/2016 12:35, Jonathon Love wrote: also, i'm not quite sure what to do with the copyright file. on github it has about 80 contributors :/ how does one handle epic author lists like this? It's not epic, it's long... perhaps there are main contributors that you can list then add

Re: FEniCS still on SVN?

2016-04-24 Thread Drew Parsons
On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 08:46 +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:47:15PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > I can clean up the current core packages (apart from mshr).  The > > deprecated ones can bitrot :) > meh. > > if a package is not needed anymore, deprecated or whatnot, the

flatbuffers - epic author list

2016-04-24 Thread Jonathon Love
hi folks, i've been packaging up the google flatbuffers library, but it's not really science-y. should i do this one separate from the debian-science project? also, i'm not quite sure what to do with the copyright file. on github it has about 80 contributors :/ how does one handle epic

Re: FEniCS still on SVN?

2016-04-24 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 01:24:55PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > One small problem.  The final upload of ffc (1.6.0-2) to unstable was > not pushed to svn (and is therefore not in the new git repo). 1.6.0-1 > had gone to experimental.   > > As far as I can see the difference is just the changelog

Re: FEniCS still on SVN?

2016-04-24 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 12:47:15PM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > ferari > ... > > syfi > > ufc > > viper > > These (and uflacs) are deprecated. Actually I don't know what syfi is, > it's not a current FENiCS package upstream. Precursor to ufc maybe, > which was a precursor to ffc. Likewise viper