On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 03:25:56PM +0200, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> > The whole bug report was, pardon my French, complete and utter nonsense.
>
> Wow. Complete and utter. A bug report affecting 100+ packages that was merged
> with two independent bug reports (861684, 862969). And that took from 2
> I am willing to sponsor your package if you accept to put it under the Debian
Science Team umbrella.
Thank you! I have no problems at all putting segyio under Debian science.
> I quickly looked at your packaging and it looks good. One point: you put your
packaging under the GPL, while upstream
Am Dienstag, 19. September 2017, 07:40:19 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On 19 September 2017 at 14:15, Johannes Ranke wrote:
> | > But you escalated it
> |
> | Mhm. I reported a bug with severity "normal". Maybe the language I used
> | was
> | too dramatic?
>
> The whole bug report was, pardo
Dear Jørgen,
On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 05:40:06PM +, Jørgen Kvalsvik wrote:
> I consider the package segyio ready for consideration in Debian, and I'm
> looking for a sponsor for the package.
>
> Please see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866601 and
> https://mentors.debian.n
On 19 September 2017 at 14:15, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| > But you escalated it
|
| Mhm. I reported a bug with severity "normal". Maybe the language I used was
| too dramatic?
The whole bug report was, pardon my French, complete and utter nonsense. The
folks who needed to know already knew.
But
> But you escalated it
Mhm. I reported a bug with severity "normal". Maybe the language I used was
too dramatic?
> And the net effect is no current R in testing for a year. Really not a good
> outcome.
This could still be overcome by introducing versioned Breaks, that could be
removed then af
On 19 September 2017 at 11:07, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 10:39:02 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > Common knowledge. I referenced it half-a-dozen times in the damned thread
| > about the binNMUs.
|
| This (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868558)
Am Montag, 18. September 2017, 10:39:02 CEST schrieb Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> On 18 September 2017 at 22:41, Charles Plessy wrote:
> | Hello everybody,
> |
> | I just wanted to relay the information that some R packages will need a
> | rebuild after the next upgrade of R. (see the email forwarded bel
8 matches
Mail list logo