Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Markus Blatt
Am Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 11:51:38PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons: As for /usr/share/dune/cmake/modules/FindMETIS.cmake, it does handle the scotchmetis version via METIS_API_VERSION If it's then going to look for find_library(METIS_LIBRARY scotchmetis), then for scotch 7 that should be updated to

Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2022-03-18 23:13, Drew Parsons wrote: On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. .. It

Re: libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote: Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. The cause for the bugs seems to be that the CMake

libscotch-dev/7.0.1-2: Why is there no libscotchmetis.so?

2022-03-18 Thread Markus Blatt
Hi, while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch transition, I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so. The cause for the bugs seems to be that the CMake scripts only search for libscotchmetis.so.

Re: Updating qiskit-* packages?

2022-03-18 Thread Nilesh Patra
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 05:01:01PM +0100, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote: > What would be the most sensible way to signal either that help would be > needed, or that the effort has stopped? We informally thought of > orphaning the package, but if there is indeed interest, might not be the > best

Re: Updating qiskit-* packages?

2022-03-18 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Nilesh, On 3/13/22 8:26 AM, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Since they are > important/interesting packages for quantum computing, I wished to ask if you > might > have plans to update it to latest upstream in near future? Or have worked on > it locally maybe? Unfortunately, the answer to both