On 2024-05-11 00:09, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 10/5/24 a las 23:59, Drew Parsons escribió:
(btw: Didn't realize there was a 3.20 release in experimental,
will test it before reporting anything, thanks!)
Great :) Upstream is reasonably conservative, likely your makefile
problem will still
On 2024-05-10 23:54, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 10/5/24 a las 23:33, Drew Parsons escribió:
On 2024-05-10 20:30, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hello.
Need some guidance here: It is ok if I commit to salsa the NMU of
slepc made by Benjamin Drung for the t64 transition?
(The package is already in testing
On 2024-05-10 23:33, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2024-05-10 20:30, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hello.
Need some guidance here: It is ok if I commit to salsa the NMU of
slepc made by Benjamin Drung for the t64 transition?
(The package is already in testing and unstable)
I ask because I want to report
On 2024-05-10 20:30, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hello.
Need some guidance here: It is ok if I commit to salsa the NMU of
slepc made by Benjamin Drung for the t64 transition?
(The package is already in testing and unstable)
I ask because I want to report (and maybe fix myself) a makefile bug.
Also:
Source: hdf5
Version: 1.10.10+repack-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org
What our situation with our hdf5 package version?
We're currently using hdf5 1.10.10,
but 1.12.2 has been available in experimental for some time,
and upsteam has released 1.14.3.
Should we be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
francesco.balla...@unicatt.it
* Package name: ngspetsc
Version : git HEAD
Upstream Contact: Umberto Zerbinati
* URL : https
On 2024-01-23 14:02, Kari Pahula wrote:
Hi, I requested access to
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ortools some time ago. Is
anyone available to process it?
I have a prospective (experimental) changes available at
https://salsa.debian.org/kaol/ortools. It requires versions of abseil
and
On 2024-01-21 21:22, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[Replying off list in case this person is reading this through
a digest or some such and is not subscribed to all lists]
On Sun, Jan 21, 2024 at 07:31:58PM +, Stelios Moschos wrote:
Hi, how to remove myself from these lists?
...
The answer
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
debian-science@lists.debian.org, debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: custodian
Version : 2024.1.9
Upstream Contact: Shyue Ping Ong
On 2023-12-10 21:55, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
Hi Rebecca, Julian and all science minded pythonistas of debian, great
and small!
3.) The following one-liner suggests 44 debian
packages might be affected by the breaks
Rebecca said would be caused by pandas 2.x:
$ for s in augur
On 2023-12-07 10:46, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 05:32:38PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
...
Two issues regarding this transition:
...
2. Packages building for both mpi implementations
The 9 yellow packages in the tracker (e.g. ScaLAPACK) currently provide
packages for
On 2023-11-24 15:00, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
My understanding is that MPICH has been typically the reference
implementation, higher quality but less performant, particularly with
the range of fabrics. Certainly I've seen mostly OpenMPI but not MPICH
on various HPC machines. People would use
On 2023-11-23 12:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi,
On 23/11/2023 09:36, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
OpenMPI has a new upstream release 5.0.0. It is in experimental now;
the SOVERSION for libraries remains 40.X (minor version increment),
there is an SOVERSION increment for private
On 2023-11-05 14:02, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Le samedi 08 juillet 2023 à 10:01 +0200, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
As the maintainer of the atlas package over the last decade, I now
wonder whether we should remove it from the archive.
Since the present thread seems to indicate that there to
On 2023-09-23 20:21, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2023-09-23 16:31, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On 2023-09-17 14:06, Drew Parsons wrote:
As far as I can tell we're ready to upgrade the family of XTL-related
packages (xtl-dev, xtensor, xsimd, pythran).
Previously dolfinx was holding it back since
On 2023-09-23 16:31, Vincent Bernat wrote:
On 2023-09-17 14:06, Drew Parsons wrote:
As far as I can tell we're ready to upgrade the family of XTL-related
packages (xtl-dev, xtensor, xsimd, pythran).
Previously dolfinx was holding it back since it didn't support the
latest version of xtensor
As far as I can tell we're ready to upgrade the family of XTL-related
packages (xtl-dev, xtensor, xsimd, pythran).
Previously dolfinx was holding it back since it didn't support the
latest version of xtensor. That restriction is now removed so I think
we're good to go. Since these are
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: mu...@packages.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mumps
I'd like clear out some transitions in the numerical library stack:
combblas:
The armhf (and x32) failure seems enduring. I guess it needs to be
fixed in code. Or ignored.
Drew
On 2023-03-22 15:07, Drew Parsons wrote:
done
On 2023-03-22 12:48, Markus Blatt wrote:
Hi,
somehow the armhf build of opm-common-2022.10+ds-6 failed. This seems
to happen
from time to time
done
On 2023-03-22 12:48, Markus Blatt wrote:
Hi,
somehow the armhf build of opm-common-2022.10+ds-6 failed. This seems
to happen
from time to time, see [1]. Not nice, but I am unable to replicate
this. There were
no changes between the versions that would explain the build failure
Would be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debichem Team
, Debian Science List
* Package name: iqmol
Version : 3.1.2
Upstream Contact: Andrew Gilbert
* URL : http://iqmol.org/
* License : GPL
On 2023-02-09 20:37, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi again,
Am Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 05:52:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> That said, the np.matrix discrepancy was only just fixed recently, in
> December, by
> https://github.com/lmcinnes/umap/pull/946
I've updated the packaging, added the PR,
On 2023-02-09 15:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
Control: tags -1 help
Am Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 12:50:45AM +0100 schrieb Santiago Vila:
Package: src:umap-learn
Version: 0.4.5+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Dear maintainer:
During a rebuild of all packages in bookworm, your package failed to
On 2023-02-07 10:54, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi
I've been pinged by the upstream maintainer of OpenMPI Jefff
Squyres as to our opinions on maintaining 32-bit support.
See a thread here: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/11282
Until now I've asked for OMPI to hold off going to 64-bit
On 2023-02-07 08:33, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Drew
I think python3-scipy should declare a Breaks on python3-skbio less
than the version in unstable (0.5.8-3).
This should sort out the autopkgtest regressions of emperor,
python-skbio itself, q2-metadata and q2-quality-control, which are all
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: python-emmet
Version : 0.36.4
Upstream Contact: Jason Munro
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: affects -1 src:pymatgen
* Package name: python-mp-api
Version : 0.27.3
Upstream Contact: Jason Munro
On 2023-01-27 10:25, Andreas Tille wrote:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1=scikit-learn
scikit-learn looks like it should manageable.
I've uploaded scipy 1.10 to unstable now.
Drew
On 2023-01-26 16:56, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 04:51:25PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons:
Thanks Andrea. armel has revealed which tests it needs skipped, so
I'll
push scipy 1.10 to unstable after scipy 1.8.1-22 is done migrating to
testing
I just notice that bug #1029701
On 2023-01-26 16:46, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Drew,
Am Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 01:46:18PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> for the release architectures with autopkgtests, so expect results for
> more architectures to appear over the next few hours.
> [1] https://qa.debian.org/ex
On 2023-01-26 14:32, Graham Inggs wrote:
I'll try to wait for scipy's own tests (armel, riscv64) before
uploading
to unstable.
riscv64 is not a release architecture (yet) and the hardware is still
a little slow, so it is not enabled for experimental pseudo excuses.
True. armel is the
On 2023-01-26 13:35, Graham Inggs wrote:
Hi Drew, Andreas
...
scipy/1.8.1-22 and numpy/1:1.24.1-2 have just migrated to testing, so
please go ahead with uploading scipy 1.10 to unstable when you're
ready.
...
The experimental pseudo excuses for scipy 1.10.0-1exp6 [1] look good
to me, only 12
On 2023-01-25 16:25, Andreas Tille wrote:
Am Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 04:23:58PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
I'm just building an according package locally and will hopefully
upload
soon.
... but Drew Parsons seems to have beaten me. ;-)
Thanks also to Drew
Andreas.
heh yeah, I was just
On 2023-01-18 22:31, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
This "broken by numpy 1.24" bug looks to me like 17033, not 17630.
This has what looks like a trivially-backportable patch, though I
haven't actually tried that:
https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/17035
We can try applying that patch to scipy 1.8
On 2023-01-17 18:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded the experimental branch of scipy to contain the submodules
upstream includes. I'm *not* convinced that we need them all -
hopefully we can get rid of boost (but upstream has some patches here)
and scipy-mathjax.
For the moment I've
On 2023-01-17 08:53, Andreas Tille wrote:
I pushed some changes to pyfr git[1] including the latest upstream
version. Unfortunately the autopkgtest fails[2] with
pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'h5py>=2.10' distribution
was not found and is required by pyfr
(which is a bit strange
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Science List
* Package name: dolfinx-mpc
Version : 0.5.0.post0
Upstream Contact: Jørgen S. Dokken
* URL : https://github.com/jorgensd/dolfinx_mpc
* License
On 2022-11-24 17:54, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
hi,
getfem-5.4.2+dfsg1-1 has been uploaded recently (thanks).
unfortunately, it fails to build on s390x (see [1]), resulting in
#1023788 which in turn now threatens one of my packages to be removed
from testing.
i would like to avoid that.
it's
On 2022-06-18 17:20, Julien Lamy wrote:
Hi Drew,
Le 17/06/2022 à 15:28, Drew Parsons a écrit :
On 2022-06-16 15:06, Julien Lamy wrote:
Hi Ileana,
I've uploaded xsimd. Thanks for your work!
-- Julien
Le 16/06/2022 à 14:43, Ileana Dumitrescu a écrit :
Hi,
I contributed and merged code
On 2022-06-16 15:06, Julien Lamy wrote:
Hi Ileana,
I've uploaded xsimd. Thanks for your work!
--
Julien
Le 16/06/2022 à 14:43, Ileana Dumitrescu a écrit :
Hi,
I contributed and merged code into salsa for several science packages.
Can someone please sponsor the uploads? Thank you!
...
On 2022-03-18 23:13, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote:
Hi,
while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch
transition,
I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just
libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so
On 2022-03-18 21:50, Markus Blatt wrote:
Hi,
while investigating several bugs [1] [2] [3] caused by the scotch
transition,
I started wondering why there is no libscotchmetis.so library but just
libscotchmetisv3.so and libscotchmetisv5.so.
The cause for the bugs seems to be that the CMake
science packages) and point special
requirements for possible applicants. Feel free to propose a text
for that. Thanks again!
Regards
Anton
Am Di., 22. Feb. 2022 um 12:52 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons
:
On 2022-02-21 17:42, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Google Summer of Code call f
Gimme a few minutes, I'll line up my text
On 2022-03-01 15:04, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Nilesh,
yes, thanks for the reminder. I will do it today.
News from the last few days beated me personally. So,
it is difficult to concentrate on the work.
Regards
Anton
Am Di., 1. März 2022 um 14:51 Uhr
On 2022-02-23 07:21, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
> It would be helpful to run parallel/HPC performance testing for our MPI
> numerical packages.
Am Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 01:06:30PM +0100 schrieb Anton Gladky:
It is a very good idea!
+1
Though I would separate this task from QA-work on Debian
On 2022-02-21 17:42, Anton Gladky wrote:
Dear all,
Google Summer of Code call for Debian is announced [1].
I am going to apply Debian Science Team as one of the projects.
Main topic is QA-Work: Autopkgtests for high-popcon packages,
gitlab-CI for most of packages, bringing not-in-testing
On 2022-02-03 23:01, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
In Debian (only change from -1 should be disabling some tests, i.e.
real pandas-related failures are unlikely):
mdtraj/amd64: upstream tests pass but a warning is printed to stderr,
which autopkgtest counts as a fail
partd/ppc64el: save/load of a
Hi Debian Science folk,
SCOTCH has made a new major release, and has also made a particular
announcement I'd like to draw your attention to.
To strengthen the long-term value of the software, they are creating a
Consortium to drive governance and development planning.
As part of that, they
On 2021-12-23 10:24, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-12-23 06:57, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800 schrieb Diane Trout:
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse
> depends
On 2021-12-23 06:57, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 05:09:35PM -0800 schrieb Diane Trout:
On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 22:24 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>
> Actually because of the current state of numba, several reverse
> depends are FTBFS so it's
> bit urgent to push. Apologies for
On 2021-12-06 16:04, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-10-29 19:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical
software.
This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go
On 2021-10-29 19:31, Torrance, Douglas wrote:
During the Debian Science BoF at this year's DebConf, there was some
discussion of creating a team devoted to packaging mathematical
software.
This seemed like a pretty good idea, so I figured that I'd go ahead and
start working on getting it set
On 2021-12-06 11:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi Drew,
Am Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 05:34:54PM +0100 schrieb Drew Parsons:
> Would you have any plans to fix the situation?
My first plan is for someone to notice that it's a team package that
they
can fix themselves.
That's for granted.
Ther
On 2021-12-04 16:20, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Drew,
You uploaded new version of sklearn a week ago, but unfortunately it
seems
to not build on several architectures and also has a failing
autopkgtest on amd64.
Would you have any plans to fix the situation?
My first plan is for someone to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pyvista
Version : 0.32.0
Upstream Author : The PyVista Developers
* URL : https://github.com/pyvista/pyvista
* License : MIT
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-meshzoo
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https://github.com/nschloe/meshzoo
* License
On 2021-11-12 14:06, George N. White III wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2021 at 13:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wonder what you think here whether it makes
sense
to stop providing the docs for this package. Packaging itself is
complex
enough and spending extra amounts of work for something users can
On 2021-11-10 20:19, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
Source: pandas
On 10/11/2021 17:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
pandas is lagging behind upstream by several versions. I guess we
should try to get in sync with upstream a bit more.
Yes, but please don't upload this yet: it's common for a pandas
On 2021-11-09 16:20, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Makes sense to me.
Maybe, it is also a fine idea to move packages which are important in
the science team,
but are unmaintained.
Ofcourse, only if some volunteer is willing to take care of it.
Makes sense to move meschach to the Maths team.
On 2021-11-05 14:44, Andrius Merkys wrote:
Hi Ole,
On 2021-11-03 13:52, Ole Streicher wrote:
...
Why can't a Python math package be maintained by both the Python and
the
math team?
Maintainer: Debian Math Team <...>
Uploaders: Debian Python Team <...>, me
This would set a primary team
On 2021-10-14 18:30, Drew Parsons wrote:
On 2021-10-14 17:52, Julien Lamy wrote:
I don't think it's purely related to gtest: the test programs
(benchmark and Mandelbrot set) don't use it, and also fail to compile.
Regarding the arch limitation, Drew Parsons suggested earlier [2] that
build
.
Regarding the arch limitation, Drew Parsons suggested earlier [2] that
build failures on a never-uploaded package wasn't really a problem: we
could keep the failing architectures so that, when the situation
improves with a future upstream version, they would be packaged
automatically.
We'll see in a few
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-science@lists.debian.org, Anton Gladky
I'd like to proceed with a transition of the numerical library stack.
This involves
superlu 5.2.2+dfsg1 -> 5.3.0+dfsg1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-npx
Version : 0.0.20
Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https://github.com
Regards
Anton
Am Fr., 1. Okt. 2021 um 02:23 Uhr schrieb Drew Parsons
:
I'm preparing the numerical library upgrade to push to unstable.
That's superlu-dist hypre mumps petsc slepc.
I discovered that sundials 2.7.0 is incompatible with hypre 2.22.
But right in the middle of testing they released 2.8.0
I'm preparing the numerical library upgrade to push to unstable.
That's superlu-dist hypre mumps petsc slepc.
I discovered that sundials 2.7.0 is incompatible with hypre 2.22.
But right in the middle of testing they released 2.8.0, so it's already
ready to go.
Anton, do you prefer to prepare
The Python Team policy looks sensible to me.
Any member of the team should be able to fix and upload any team package
in general. That helps spread the load and keeps the packages fresh.
But reasonable also to have a stronger oversight model (the weak
collaboration case) if a particular
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: pythran
Version : 0.9.12
Upstream Author : Serge Guelton
* URL : https://github.com/serge-sans-paille/pythran
* License : BSD
CUDA is a poor solution. nVidia only, proprietary. Need to enourage
upstreams to use the other solutions.
I don't know ROCm, maybe it's good. Open source at least.
SYCL is a good target, should be supported. Supersedes OpenCL.
Drew
On 2021-05-21 06:40, M. Zhou wrote:
Hi folks,
---
Q:
On 2021-05-04 10:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Hi Drew and Mo,
Le mardi 04 mai 2021 à 05:25 +, M. Zhou a écrit :
On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 13:50 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Mo Zhou did the good work of setting up an alternatives framework for
> our BLAS libraries, which is great.
Mo Zhou did the good work of setting up an alternatives framework for
our BLAS libraries, which is great. We can select between OpenBLAS,
BLIS, whatever is best for the local system (even intel-mkl).
But the framework was set up with double handling of the basic
libblas.so alternative symlink
On 2021-04-25 15:58, Julien Lamy wrote:
Le 25/04/2021 à 12:29, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
...
/home/nilesh/xsimd/xsimd/test/test_api.cpp:222:1: error:
‘gtest_type_params_xsimd_api_test_’ was not declared in this scope;
did you mean ‘gtest_type_params_xsimd_api_test_NameGenerator’?
222 |
On 2021-04-25 09:56, Julien Lamy wrote:
Le 22/04/2021 à 19:30, Nilesh Patra a écrit :
...
I tried in a ppc64el porter box, and I get several of:
/home/nilesh/xsimd/xsimd/test/test_batch_bool.cpp:315:1: error:
'gtest_type_params_batch_bool_test_' was not declared in this scope;
did you mean
As far as --march=native goes, in my opinion it's ok since it's only
used in tests, i.e. testing that the files build and run.
This is because it's actually a header-only package, no binaries
(executables or libraries) are provided. So the package that we ship
hasn't been "built" with
On 2021-04-22 12:09, Julien Lamy wrote:
>>
Not really. Upload for packages which are not in testing can be done,
and accpeted.
New packages targeting unstable is absolutely OK. It's just that they
won't migrate to testing until bullseye is out.
That said, I'll happily sponsor you an upload
On 2021-04-22 11:23, Nilesh Patra wrote:
Hi Julien,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 at 11:51, Julien Lamy wrote:
Dear all,
I'm working on a project which depends on xsimd, a C++ wrapper for
SIMD
...
I have added you to the science team, please push your changes to the
science-team namespace.
Welcome
Multibody dynamics brings to mind molecular dynamics (gromacs, lammps),
though you mean contact mechanics not atomistic dynamics. Perhaps the
MD software can be adapted to that though it would be a different kind
of model (element-based contact modelling rather than continuum body
modelling)
I've got some sympathy for the upstream author, to be honest. I'm
currently processing bug reports for Ubuntu bionic builds arising from
issues I had fixed three years ago in Debian...
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, Debian Science List
* Package name: xtensor-blas
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : QuantStack: Wolf Vollprecht, Johan Mabille and Sylvain
Corlay
* URL : https
I agree dropping MPI for 32-bit altogether is probably not optimal.
We've already got the mpi-default mechanism so apart from general bugs
it shouldn't be too much trouble to switch the 32-bit systems to mpich
(option 2). In a way it could also serve as an intermediate test case
towards
On 2021-03-05 16:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:47AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
It seems unlikely that upstream will have changed their mind, it
was only a few months ago when we had the discussion with them.
I intend to draw it into a different audience[1] but not in
On 2021-01-21 21:10, Anton Gladky wrote:
Hi Thomas,
there is one of examples [1].
...
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/vtk9/-/tree/master/debian/tests
Am Di., 19. Jan. 2021 um 23:02 Uhr schrieb Thomas Schiex
...
Also, if someone has an example of a package that uses autopkgtest
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: basix
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : FEniCS Project
* URL : https://github.com/FEniCS/basix
* License : MIT
On 2020-12-08 04:07, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
vmtk is using Python3 in Git[1], but there are build issues with vtk7:
First thing to try would be building against vtk9, which Anton recently
released for us.
Upstream authors in other packages have commented that vtk7 is quite
old. Builds
(multiple definitions of int/long prototypes in templates) and memory
exhaustion in compilation.
Is there much merit in building Paraview for 32-bit platforms or
should they be dropped?
Alastair
On 30/11/2020, 02:05, "Drew Parsons" wrote:
Hi Anton and Alastair, just a big
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
lu...@debian.org
* Package name: fenicsx-performance-tests
Version : git20200719.42769f8
Upstream Author : Chris N. Richardson
* URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
lu...@debian.org
* Package name: fenics-performance-tests
Version : git20190115.e866927
Upstream Author : Chris N. Richardson
* URL
On 2020-08-24 06:30, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950430
pandas 1.0 has been in experimental for 6+ months, because it breaks
some of its reverse dependencies:
In testing:
#950924 python-feather-format (has patch, no maintainer response to it)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org,
debian-science@lists.debian.org
* Package name: python-meshplex
Version : 0.13.2
Upstream Author : Nico Schlömer
* URL : https
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org,
debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name: opendrop
Version : 3.1.7dev0
Upstream Author : Joseph Berry, Rico Tabor, E. Huang (opendrop
On 2020-08-08 17:10, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
On 08/08/2020 10:59, Drew Parsons wrote:
One question: those benchmarks indicate that scipy CG or Powell
generally performs better. What is the use-case for minuit? Why not
just use scipy?
In my experience, minimizers do not always run well on all
On 2020-08-08 13:53, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
Sorry. I forgot to CC the science list while filing the ITP.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 968075:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=968075.
Package: wnpp
* Package name: iminuit
* URL :
On 2020-08-08 01:32, Jeremy Sanders wrote:
Hi -
I was looking for iminuit in Debian and found it wasn't packaged. It's
a rather useful Python fitting library. iminuit bundles the minuit
library from libroot. As far as I can see, root was removed from
Debian as it was too difficult and large to
On 2020-07-28 14:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
its a bit off topic here but I hope to get some links. For my talk at
DebConf Online I want to analyse contributions on a monthly or weekly
base and plot graphs (either with gnuplot or R - whatever I can find an
easier solution with). I can
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debichem-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
debian-science@lists.debian.org, debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Control: block 962440 by -1
* Package name: python-gsd
Version : 2.1.2
Upstream Author : Joshua A. Anderson et al, University of
On 2020-06-23 09:55, Drew Parsons wrote:
Nice work. I can sponsor this.
Drew
On 2020-06-23 01:00, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "symfit"
* Package name: symfit
Nice work. I can sponsor this.
Drew
On 2020-06-23 01:00, Stephan Lachnit wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "symfit"
* Package name: symfit
Version : 0.5.2-1
Upstream Author : Martin Roelfs
*
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 962440 by -1
* Package name: python3-griddataformats
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Oliver Beckstein
* URL : https://www.mdanalysis.org/GridDataFormats/
* License : LGPL3+
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 962440 by -1
* Package name: python3-mmtf
Version : 1.1.2
Upstream Author : Anthony Bradley
* URL : https://github.com/rcsb/mmtf-python
* License : Apache2
Programming Lang: Python
Description : binary
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Drew Parsons
* Package name: mdtraj
Version : 1.9.4
Upstream Author : Robert McGibbon and team
* URL : http://mdtraj.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Read, write and analyze MD
1 - 100 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
