Re: Seeking a small group to package Apache Arrow (was: Bug#970021: RFP: apache-arrow -- cross-language development platform for in-memory analytics)

2024-03-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey: * Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache Parquet) liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it. I didn't invest any time in Apache

Re: CoinMP was listed as smelling ;-)

2021-11-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, Am 10.11.21 um 16:35 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > The tracker also does not show the repository (VCS: unknown) and also > an ancient S-V (3.9.8) > would you consider modernizing it whenever you upload next? No. Regards, Rene

Re: CoinMP was listed as smelling ;-)

2021-11-10 Thread Rene Engelhard
Am 10. November 2021 12:06:16 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille : >Hi Rene, > >I've found coinmp at the list of smelling packages[1] and found some >spare cycles to reduce its smell. ;-) > >In VCS I've found > > coinmp (1.8.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium > > * upload to unstable > > >but this

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-05 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 01:26:31PM +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 08:18:41 +0100, rene.engelh...@mailbox.org wrote: > > Thanks, yes, that prevents the install of the "old" > > gobject-introspection with the new python3 from experimental. > > Sorry, I wasn't thinking

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread rene . engelhard
Hi, Am 4. Februar 2020 23:27:13 MEZ schrieb Simon McVittie : >On Tue, 04 Feb 2020 at 21:20:07 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> root@frodo:/# g-ir-scanner >... >> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'giscanner._giscanner' > >This is fixed in 1.62.0-5 (#950267). Th

Re: Bug#949187: transition: python3.8

2020-02-04 Thread Rene Engelhard
s accidentially kept disabled after a python3.8 test rebuild... * re-enable building of the "test packages" (-smoketest-data, -subsequentcheckbase) -- Rene Engelhard Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:29:19 + happened.) Regards, Rene

Re: Auto Backporting (Was: Backports of scientific packages)

2009-09-25 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:06:15PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: So in short: we should choose the well-defined subset of packages which are candidates for autobackporting according to their feature to be buildable inside