Le Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:16:49PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
package1/trunk/
package1/branches/
package2/trunk/
package2/branches/
[..]
tags/package1/
tags/package2/
And finally write down this in a policy document to keep people informed
On Fri, May 9, 2008 3:40 pm, Teemu Ikonen wrote:
As for the other project infrastructure: git subprojects (or a
superproject) will allow checkouts of all packages at once.
I have to say that from my packaging experience with Git I do not think
that this is a good idea since my experience with
On Fri, May 9, 2008 4:45 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote:
I just want to make a suggestion: tags should not be inside the packages
directory. It is IMHO better put outside, [...]
I think you're talking about Subversion for our team packaging effort,
right? This should be no problem with Git, as Git
On Fri, May 9, 2008 3:32 pm, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hope this clarifies things.
It did. Thank you!
Best regards
Manuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Bryan Bishop wrote:
Hey there; if I wanted to get started with the a list of related
projects and the programs to be categorized in some ontology on the
wiki, where would I start?
I think starting with a Wiki is the wrong approach because it becomes
outdated very quickly.
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Ross Boylan wrote:
packagesearch should be useful.
But sounds also quite incomplete. I tested seeking Biology where
I know a lot of relevant packages but it brought up not nearly half
the relevant packages (even if it featured one that was new to me which
made the hint
Am Freitag, den 09.05.2008, 14:49 +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Well, follow the DoOcracy principle: The doer decides. If I understood
right David Bremner volunteered also to work actively on a repository
with exactly the same preferences like you. So I guess he is not really
unhappy if you
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
I'm probably offline until Monday but would volunteer to get the
repository installed and set up. I guess I can report back on Wednesday
next week latest, if that's considered a reasonable time frame.
Sure.
I'll have a closer look but at the first
Regarding the number of replies and the will to do something on this, we
could do something on this!
I'd also like to help. To also address my concerns on the name: As
Andreas already said, I also think naming discussions tend to go
nowhere. BUT in this case, I'd really prefer debian-science
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 1:43 AM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do we need minimally to get
started?
Hi,
FWIW, I would also like to support the name 'debian-science' as the
name of the project and git as the VCS.
I think the easiest way to get things started would be to just
CCed pkg-scicomp-devel
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 15:18 +0200 schrieb Christophe
Prud'homme:
| but I think we should not let the activity boil
| down. Would you take over the job to restructure either pkg-science
| or start a debian-science repository? I leave the choice of the name
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Daniel Leidert wrote:
package1/trunk/
package1/branches/
package2/trunk/
package2/branches/
[..]
tags/package1/
tags/package2/
And finally write down this in a policy document to keep people informed ...
This is forgotten to often, unfurtunately.
Kind regards
Le jeudi 08 mai 2008 à 07:22 +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ...
So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do not really
know what this means, but I think we should not let the activity
On Thu, 8 May 2008, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
We could wait a few days more.
Surely we could, but I'm learned in the past that some days tend to
increase to some weeks while the number some is stretched in the
same way then the time unit.
They are doing a nice and important work.
No doubt
[ Thursday 08 May 2008 ]
| So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far.
see my answer to Frederic.
| I do not really
| know what this means,
it means I am busy. Being a professor at a university is certainly a busy
job ;). Moreover it is holiday here in France.
| but I think we
Andreas == Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andreas On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ...
Andreas So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do
Andreas not really know what this means, but I think we should
Le Fri, May 09, 2008 at 01:43:59AM +0200, David Bremner a écrit :
Also git naturally produces a one repo per package viewpoint
(which is a bit awkward for people like pkg-perl, but not so
conclusive for us, I think).
Hi all,
In Debian-Med we are trying to understand better Git in order to see
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:43 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not seem to make sense to me to get carried away with
infrastructure from the very start (also, like almost everyone else, I
have only so much time for Debian). What do we need minimally to get
started? I would say
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 20:18 -0500, Bryan Bishop wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:43 PM, David Bremner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It does not seem to make sense to me to get carried away with
infrastructure from the very start (also, like almost everyone else, I
have only so much time for
On Tue, 6 May 2008, David Bremner wrote:
If there is to be any sort of reorganization, ...
So well, David, no answers from pkg-scicomp so far. I do not really
know what this means, but I think we should not let the activity boil
down. Would you take over the job to restructure either
20 matches
Mail list logo
