David Bremner wrote:
[snip]
> Speaking only for my self, I don't see a problem with shipping DFSG-free [0]
> licensed data with GPL code. As long as the code runs fine without the
> models in
> question, I guess it is pretty clearly not linked.
>
> [quote of proposed license]
>
> >> Any changes
"Getz, Robin" writes:
> Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there
> aren't distribution objections before I start verifying everything.
>
> Some background:
> I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which
> are not under the GPL, but a
Adding the debian maintainer, and debian-science list to make sure there aren't
distribution objections before I start verifying everything.
Some background:
I would like to include some vendor specific SPICE models with Qucs, which are
not under the GPL, but a license which (I hope) to be compl
3 matches
Mail list logo
