Re: Bug#1027215: Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 03/03/2023 06:00, Andreas Tille wrote: Ahh, so aesara is not really a "fork" but a "rename"? The original is abandoned (no new development since 2017, and now mostly unmaintained, which is probably why it has this kind of bug). Aesara is a continuation by a new upstream (possibly one

Re: Bug#1027215: Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-02 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Rebecca, Am Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 09:00:14PM + schrieb Rebecca N. Palmer: > > 1.1.2 isn't the latest version, just the latest that calls the module theano > rather than aesara. (I chose it to package because I didn't want to fully > break compatibility, then abandoned it because I didn't

Re: Bug#1027215: Bug#1026539: How much do we lose if we remove theano (+keras, deepnano, invesalius)?

2023-03-02 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 02/03/2023 10:38, Andreas Tille wrote: I admit I do not see any good reason to stick to the old version if we decided before that keras/deepnano are no real blockers to even drop theano. Thus I was considering it more promising to spent my time on the latest version. 1.1.2 isn't the latest