Dear Andreas,
My apologies for the regrettable git pushing. The debian mechanics is
hard to decipher when you are not used to it.
In all cases, many thanks for the additional clarification. I understand
you are busy, so don't spend time reading / answering this mail.
My answers for the list:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 10:18:19AM +0200, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> Thanks a lot, the uscan worked fine! Excited with this, I did this:
>
> - I integrated your commit in our upstream git repo (with thanks :-)
Why? Its fully sufficient in
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 11:02:32PM +0200, Thomas Schiex wrote:
> Thanks Andreas. Didn't know such repack was possible (discovered
> https://wiki.debian.org/BenFinney/software/repack following your mail).
>
> Looks like a perfect fit for what I need !
Please note thet this Wiki link is
On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 01:21:11PM +0200, Thomas Schiex wrote:
>
> When I try to build the package, there is a series of messages:
>
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory lib
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring deletion of directory lib/win32
> dpkg-source: warning: ignoring
Lumin wrote on 29/06/2018:
> 1. Git repository layout in question
>
>File debian/source/format writes "3.0 (quilt)", so the master
>branch should hold the "packaging commits" instead of the
>"upstream commits". By the way, please always keep the
>"upstream" and "pristine-tar"
Dear Lumin,
I hope is still do not disturb.
I'm coming back to you for one more advice. Here is point by point list
of what I did with one question:
> I indeed spotted something that doesn't match the debian-science
> conventions:
>
> 1. Git repository layout in question
>
>File
Hi Thomas,
Glad to see you came back to maintain this package.
This package gives an overview of your package status in Debian:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/toulbar2
> Would it be possible to have any feedback on this:
>
> - is it packaging fine on salsa (am I finished) ?
I indeed
7 matches
Mail list logo
