Re: pandas 1.3.5+dfsg-2 autopkgtest failures

2022-02-05 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
pandas has now migrated (on both Debian and Ubuntu). I have uploaded versions of statsmodels and snakemake that should (almost always) avoid these test failures, and reported the partd failure as #1005045.

Re: pandas 1.3.5+dfsg-2 autopkgtest failures

2022-02-04 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Drew Parsons writes: > Thanks Rebecca. Looks like the mdtraj error is transient, passes > eventually. Makes it hard to debug robustly. FWIW, I've found rr very helpful in such cases. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit

Re: pandas 1.3.5+dfsg-2 autopkgtest failures

2022-02-04 Thread Drew Parsons
On 2022-02-03 23:01, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: In Debian (only change from -1 should be disabling some tests, i.e. real pandas-related failures are unlikely): mdtraj/amd64: upstream tests pass but a warning is printed to stderr, which autopkgtest counts as a fail partd/ppc64el: save/load of a plai

pandas 1.3.5+dfsg-2 autopkgtest failures

2022-02-03 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
In Debian (only change from -1 should be disabling some tests, i.e. real pandas-related failures are unlikely): mdtraj/amd64: upstream tests pass but a warning is printed to stderr, which autopkgtest counts as a fail partd/ppc64el: save/load of a plain string fails snakemake/i386: hang in test_p