Which mailing list for maintainer field?

Hi, I take this opportunity to raise the general question. Teemu Ikonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-05-23 15:37:31) : I'll try to add the final polish to rasmol this weekend and move the existing git repo from collab-maint to debian-science, since I'm more active in that group. Group maintenance

Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?

I think it is, but we should make a policy of whether using debian-science or debian-science-maintainers http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers for the maintainer field. Manuel and I are writing the policy and we detailed this point. It is clear that should

Re: cbflib_0.7.9.1-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED

On Fri, 23 May 2008, Teemu Ikonen wrote: I'll try to add the final polish to rasmol this weekend and move the existing git repo from collab-maint to debian-science, since I'm more active in that group. Group maintenance of rasmol would be nice, but is it ok to change the maintainer field to

Re: Which mailing list for maintainer field?

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Sylvestre Ledru [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think it is, but we should make a policy of whether using debian-science or debian-science-maintainers http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers for the maintainer field. Manuel and I

Re: DPL teams review 2008

Hi, Steve McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2008-04-29 00:59:54) : What I want from the review === It's probably best if I lay down some ground rules here to start with. Firstly, I'm not wanting to prompt more flame wars. But I do want to see honest, truthful opinions